LCDR, Dental Corps, United States Navy, California, USA.
Conservative Dentistry Department, University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan.
J Esthet Restor Dent. 2022 Apr;34(3):512-518. doi: 10.1111/jerd.12666. Epub 2020 Oct 3.
This study examined the in vitro fatigue resistance of maxillary premolars with 2 mm or 3 mm preserved cusp thicknesses restored with lithium disilicate onlays.
Premolars(N = 48) were divided into six groups. Onlays for groups 1 to 4 preserved a 3 mm functional (G1), 2 mm functional (G2), 3 mm nonfunctional (G3), or 2 mm nonfunctional (G4) buccal-lingual cusp width. Onlays for group 5 (G5, control) replaced both cusps. Group 6 (G6) samples were identical to G1 with added retentive boxes. Lithium disilicate onlays were exposed to thermocycling (10 000 cycles, 5°C-55°C, 30s/cycle) and mechanical loading (1.2 million cycles at 1.4 Hz and 70 N). All samples were examined for onlay debonding or cusp or onlay fracture.
Failure rates were 75%(G1), 0.0%(G2), 12.5%(G3), 0.0%(G4), 0.0%(G5), and 0.0%(G6). The difference in percent failure between the groups preserving the functional cusps (37.5%) and the groups preserving the nonfunctional cusps (6.3%) was statistically significant (P = .04; 95%CI:2.11-55.66). No cusp or restoration fractures were observed; all failures were due to debonding of the restoration.
Teeth with thin remaining cusps that were restored with bonded lithium disilicate onlay restorations were not prone to fracture. Retentive preparation features that physically eliminated lateral displacement prevented onlay debonding even though the ceramic-enamel margin was directly at the occlusal contact.
The use of adhesively retained lithium disilicate ceramic onlays may be a viable alternative to full coverage restorations and may challenge traditionally accepted principals related to preparation resistance and retention form of ceramic partial coverage restorations.
本研究旨在评估 2mm 或 3mm 牙尖保留厚度的上颌前磨牙,采用锂硅玻璃陶瓷嵌体修复后的体外疲劳抗力。
将 48 颗前磨牙分为 6 组。第 1 至 4 组嵌体(G1 至 G4)保留 3mm 功能(G1)、2mm 功能(G2)、3mm 非功能(G3)或 2mm 非功能(G4)颊舌向牙尖宽度。第 5 组(G5,对照组)嵌体替换两个牙尖。第 6 组(G6)样本与 G1 相同,增加了固位箱。锂硅玻璃陶瓷嵌体经历热循环(10000 次,5°C-55°C,30s/次)和机械加载(1.4Hz 和 70N,120 万次)。所有样本均检查嵌体是否脱落、牙尖或嵌体是否折断。
G1 组失败率为 75%,G2 组为 0.0%,G3 组为 12.5%,G4 组为 0.0%,G5 组为 0.0%,G6 组为 0.0%。保留功能牙尖(37.5%)和保留非功能牙尖(6.3%)的组之间的失败百分比差异具有统计学意义(P=0.04;95%CI:2.11-55.66)。未观察到牙尖或修复体骨折,所有失败均归因于修复体脱落。
用粘结性锂硅玻璃陶瓷嵌体修复的剩余牙尖较薄的牙齿不易发生骨折。保留预备特征可防止嵌体脱落,即使陶瓷-釉质边缘直接位于咬合接触处,也可防止侧向移位。
使用粘结性保留的锂硅玻璃陶瓷嵌体可能是全冠修复的可行替代方案,可能挑战与预备阻力和陶瓷部分覆盖修复体保留形式相关的传统公认原则。