Department of Neurology, Shuang Ho Hospital, Taipei Medical University, No 291 ZhongZheng Road, Zhonghe District, New Taipei City, Taiwan.
Brain and Consciousness Research Center, Taipei Medical University-Shuang Ho Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan.
Neuropsychol Rev. 2020 Dec;30(4):499-520. doi: 10.1007/s11065-020-09456-2. Epub 2020 Oct 3.
Impulsivity is a multi-faceted construct that underpins various mental health disorders. Impulsive behavior exacts a substantial health and economic burden, hence the importance of developing specific interventions to target impulsivity. Two forms of non-invasive brain stimulation, namely transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), have been used to modulate impulsivity. To date, no reviews have systematically examined their effects on modulating impulsivity in people with mental health disorders. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature from AMED, Embase, Medline and PsycINFO databases on the use of rTMS and tDCS to modulate impulsivity in people with mental health disorders. Results from 11 tDCS and 18 rTMS studies indicate that tDCS has a significant, albeit small, effect on modulating impulsivity (g = 0.29; 95% CI, 0.09 to 0.48; p = .004) whereas rTMS has no significant effect on impulsivity (g = -0.08; 95% Cl, -0.35 to 0.19; p = .550). Subgroup analyses identified the key parameters required to enhance the effects of tDCS and rTMS on impulsivity. Gender and stimulation intensity acted as significant moderators for effects of rTMS on impulsivity. There is insufficient evidence to support the use of tDCS or rTMS in clinical practice to reduce impulsivity in people with mental health disorders. The use of standardized non-invasive brain stimulation protocols and outcome measures in patients with the same diagnosis is advised to minimize methodological heterogeneity.
冲动是一个多方面的结构,它是各种心理健康障碍的基础。冲动行为会给健康和经济带来巨大负担,因此开发针对冲动的特定干预措施非常重要。两种非侵入性脑刺激形式,即经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)和重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS),已被用于调节冲动。迄今为止,尚无综述系统地检查它们在调节心理健康障碍患者冲动方面的作用。我们对 AMED、Embase、Medline 和 PsycINFO 数据库中的文献进行了系统综述和荟萃分析,研究了 rTMS 和 tDCS 在调节心理健康障碍患者冲动方面的作用。11 项 tDCS 和 18 项 rTMS 研究的结果表明,tDCS 对调节冲动有显著但较小的影响(g=0.29;95%CI,0.09 至 0.48;p=0.004),而 rTMS 对冲动没有显著影响(g=-0.08;95%CI,-0.35 至 0.19;p=0.550)。亚组分析确定了增强 tDCS 和 rTMS 对冲动影响所需的关键参数。性别和刺激强度是 rTMS 对冲动影响的重要调节因素。没有足够的证据支持在临床实践中使用 tDCS 或 rTMS 来降低心理健康障碍患者的冲动。建议对具有相同诊断的患者使用标准化的非侵入性脑刺激方案和结果测量,以最小化方法学异质性。