University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, 2052, Australia.
School of Pharmacy, MCPHS University, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
Neurosurg Rev. 2021 Aug;44(4):1921-1931. doi: 10.1007/s10143-020-01406-z. Epub 2020 Oct 3.
Anticoagulant therapy poses a significant risk for patients undergoing emergency neurosurgery procedures, necessitating reversal with prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC) or fresh frozen plasma (FFP). Data on PCC efficacy lack consistency in this setting. This systematic review and metaanalysis aimed to evaluate efficacy and safety of PCC for anticoagulation reversal in the context of urgent neurosurgery. Articles from PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases were screened according to the PRISMA checklist. Adult patients receiving anticoagulation reversal with PCC for emergency neurosurgical procedures were included. When available, patients who received FFP were included as a comparison group. Pooled estimates of observational studies were calculated for efficacy and safety outcomes via random-effects modeling. Initial search returned 4505 articles, of which 15 studies met the inclusion criteria. Anticoagulants used included warfarin (83%), rivaroxaban (6.8%), phenprocoumon (6.1%), apixaban (2.2%), and dabigatran (1.5%). The mean International Normalized Ratio (INR) prePCC administration ranged from 2.3 to 11.7, while postPCC administration from 1.1 to 1.4. All-cause mortality at 30 days was 27% (95%CI 21, 34%; I = 44.6%; p-heterogeneity = 0.03) and incidence of thromboembolic events was 6.00% among patients treated with PCC (95%CI 4.00, 10.0%; I = 0%; p-heterogeneity = 0.83). Results comparing PCC and FFP demonstrated no statistically significant differences in INR reversal, mortality, or incidence of thromboembolic events. This metaanalysis demonstrated adequate safety and efficacy for PCC in the reversal of anticoagulation for urgent neurosurgical procedures. There was no significant difference between PCC and FFP, though further trials would be useful in demonstrating the safety and efficacy of PCC in this setting.
抗凝治疗对接受紧急神经外科手术的患者存在重大风险,需要用凝血酶原复合物浓缩物(PCC)或新鲜冷冻血浆(FFP)来逆转。在这种情况下,关于 PCC 疗效的数据缺乏一致性。本系统评价和荟萃分析旨在评估 PCC 在紧急神经外科手术中用于抗凝逆转的疗效和安全性。根据 PRISMA 清单筛选来自 PubMed、Embase 和 Cochrane 数据库的文章。纳入接受 PCC 逆转抗凝治疗以进行紧急神经外科手术的成年患者。如有可能,将接受 FFP 的患者纳入作为对照组。通过随机效应模型计算观察性研究的疗效和安全性结局的汇总估计值。最初的搜索返回了 4505 篇文章,其中 15 项研究符合纳入标准。使用的抗凝剂包括华法林(83%)、利伐沙班(6.8%)、苯丙香豆素(6.1%)、阿哌沙班(2.2%)和达比加群(1.5%)。PCC 给药前的平均国际标准化比值(INR)范围为 2.3 至 11.7,而 PCC 给药后的 INR 范围为 1.1 至 1.4。30 天的全因死亡率为 27%(95%CI 21,34%;I=44.6%;p 异质性=0.03),接受 PCC 治疗的患者发生血栓栓塞事件的发生率为 6.00%(95%CI 4.00,10.0%;I=0%;p 异质性=0.83)。比较 PCC 和 FFP 的结果表明,INR 逆转、死亡率或血栓栓塞事件发生率无统计学差异。这项荟萃分析表明 PCC 在紧急神经外科手术中逆转抗凝治疗具有足够的安全性和疗效。PCC 和 FFP 之间没有显著差异,但进一步的试验将有助于证明 PCC 在这种情况下的安全性和疗效。