Suppr超能文献

他克莫司 0.1%对比环吡酮胺 1%用于治疗严重面部脂溢性皮炎患者的维持治疗:一项多中心、双盲、随机对照研究。

Tacrolimus 0.1% versus ciclopiroxolamine 1% for maintenance therapy in patients with severe facial seborrheic dermatitis: A multicenter, double-blind, randomized controlled study.

机构信息

Department of Dermatology, Rouen University Hospital and INSERM U1234, Centre de référence des maladies bulleuses autoimmunes, Normandie University, Rouen, France.

Department of Dermatology, Rouen University Hospital and INSERM U1234, Centre de référence des maladies bulleuses autoimmunes, Normandie University, Rouen, France.

出版信息

J Am Acad Dermatol. 2021 May;84(5):1278-1284. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2020.09.055. Epub 2020 Sep 30.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

No long-term maintenance therapy has been tested in patients with seborrheic dermatitis (SD).

OBJECTIVE

We sought to compare the efficacy and tolerance of tacrolimus 0.1% ointment versus ciclopiroxolamine 1% cream as maintenance therapy for severe SD.

METHODS

This double-blind randomized controlled study was conducted from 2014 to 2017 in 5 Dermatology Departments and 15 dermatology practices in France. Consecutive patients with severe and chronic facial SD were included. Patients were initially treated with desonide 0.05% cream twice daily for 7 days. Patients cleared after this open phase were randomized to receive tacrolimus 0.1% or ciclopiroxolamine 1% cream 2 times a week 24 weeks. The primary endpoint was disease-free-duration, defined as the time from randomization to first relapse.

RESULTS

One hundred fourteen patients were randomized (tacrolimus, n = 57; ciclopiroxolamine, n = 57). Twelve patients relapsed in the tacrolimus group after a median delay of 91.5 days (range 15-195 days) versus 23 patients in the ciclopiroxolamine group (median delay, 27 days [range 13-201 days]). Comparison of disease-free duration curves showed that patients in the tacrolimus group had a longer duration of complete remission than those in the ciclopiroxolamine group (P = .018), corresponding to a hazard ratio of relapse of 0.44 (95% confidence interval 0.22-0.89; P = .022).

LIMITATIONS

The theoretical sample size was not reached.

CONCLUSION

Tacrolimus 0.1% is more effective than ciclopiroxolamine 1% as maintenance therapy for patients with facial SD.

摘要

背景

目前尚未对脂溢性皮炎(SD)患者进行长期维持治疗的测试。

目的

我们旨在比较他克莫司 0.1%软膏与环吡酮胺 1%乳膏作为严重 SD 维持治疗的疗效和耐受性。

方法

这是一项在法国 5 个皮肤科和 15 个皮肤科诊所进行的双盲随机对照研究,从 2014 年到 2017 年,纳入了严重且慢性面部 SD 的连续患者。患者最初接受二丙酸倍他米松 0.05%乳膏,每天两次,持续 7 天。在这个开放期后,患者清除后被随机分配接受他克莫司 0.1%或环吡酮胺 1%乳膏,每周 2 次,共 24 周。主要终点是无病持续时间,定义为从随机分组到首次复发的时间。

结果

114 例患者被随机分配(他克莫司组,n=57;环吡酮胺组,n=57)。他克莫司组有 12 例患者在中位数 91.5 天(范围 15-195 天)后复发,而环吡酮胺组有 23 例患者复发(中位数延迟,27 天[范围 13-201 天])。比较无病持续时间曲线表明,他克莫司组患者的完全缓解持续时间长于环吡酮胺组(P=0.018),复发风险比为 0.44(95%置信区间 0.22-0.89;P=0.022)。

局限性

未达到理论样本量。

结论

他克莫司 0.1%作为面部 SD 患者的维持治疗比环吡酮胺 1%更有效。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验