Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, USA.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2021 Jun;30(6):1223-1229. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2020.09.003. Epub 2020 Oct 1.
The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) has become increasingly popular among orthopedic surgeons treating shoulder pathology. Despite this, there have been few studies that have described and compared preoperative reference scores for specific shoulder surgical procedures. The primary purpose of this study was to establish and compare baseline preoperative PROMIS scores for 3 common types of shoulder surgery: rotator cuff repair (RCR), total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA), and labral repair (LR). The secondary goal was to stratify these operative groups by diagnosis and compare preoperative PROMIS scores.
In this cross-sectional study, adult and pediatric patients who underwent surgery for either RCR, TSA, or LR were included. PROMIS-Upper Extremity (UE), PROMIS-Pain Interference (PI), and PROMIS-Depression (D) scores that were collected at each patient's preoperative visit were reviewed. Continuous and categorical variables were compared between operative groups using analysis of variance and χ or Fisher exact tests, respectively. Multivariable general linear models were used to identify significant independent predictors of PROMIS scores when controlling for age, sex, and body mass index.
A total of 413 patients were included in the study: 272 in the RCR group, 84 in the TSA group, and 57 in the LR group. The average PROMIS-UE score was 39.8 in the LR group vs. 29.9 in the RCR group (P < .001) and 29.6 in the TSA group (P < .001). There was no difference between the mean RCR and TSA PROMIS-UE scores (P = .93). The average PROMIS-PI score was 56.6 in the LR group vs. 62.8 in the RCR group (P < .001) and 63.9 in the TSA group (P < .001). There was no difference between RCR and TSA PROMIS-PI scores (P = .09). The average PROMIS-D score was 43.5 in the LR group vs. 47.7 in the RCR group (P = .004) and 50.3 in the TSA group (P < .001). The TSA group had a higher mean PROMIS-D score than the RCR group (P = .03). For PROMIS-UE scores, age and body mass index were not found to be significant independent predictors (P = .98 and P = .88, respectively). For PROMIS-PI scores, age, body mass index, and sex were not found to be significant independent predictors (P = .31, P = .81, and P = .48, respectively).
Patients undergoing shoulder LR had higher preoperative function scores and lower pain interference and depression scores than those undergoing TSA and RCR. These baseline PROMIS scores should be taken into consideration when tracking a patient's outcomes after surgery, as a certain score could mean drastically different functional and pain outcomes depending on the underlying pathology.
患者报告的结局测量信息系统(PROMIS)在治疗肩部病变的骨科医生中越来越受欢迎。尽管如此,仍有少数研究描述并比较了特定肩部手术的术前参考评分。本研究的主要目的是为三种常见的肩部手术(肩袖修复术(RCR)、全肩关节置换术(TSA)和盂唇修复术(LR))建立和比较基线术前 PROMIS 评分。次要目标是按诊断对这些手术组进行分层,并比较术前 PROMIS 评分。
在这项横断面研究中,纳入了接受 RCR、TSA 或 LR 手术的成人和儿科患者。回顾每位患者术前就诊时收集的 PROMIS 上肢(UE)、PROMIS 疼痛干扰(PI)和 PROMIS 抑郁(D)评分。使用方差分析和 χ 或 Fisher 确切检验分别比较手术组之间的连续和分类变量。使用多变量线性模型,在控制年龄、性别和体重指数的情况下,确定 PROMIS 评分的显著独立预测因素。
共有 413 名患者纳入研究:RCR 组 272 名,TSA 组 84 名,LR 组 57 名。LR 组的平均 PROMIS-UE 评分为 39.8,RCR 组为 29.9(P<0.001),TSA 组为 29.6(P<0.001)。RCR 和 TSA 的 PROMIS-UE 评分之间无差异(P=0.93)。LR 组的平均 PROMIS-PI 评分为 56.6,RCR 组为 62.8(P<0.001),TSA 组为 63.9(P<0.001)。RCR 和 TSA 的 PROMIS-PI 评分之间无差异(P=0.09)。LR 组的平均 PROMIS-D 评分为 43.5,RCR 组为 47.7(P=0.004),TSA 组为 50.3(P<0.001)。TSA 组的 PROMIS-D 评分高于 RCR 组(P=0.03)。对于 PROMIS-UE 评分,年龄和体重指数不是显著的独立预测因素(P=0.98 和 P=0.88)。对于 PROMIS-PI 评分,年龄、体重指数和性别不是显著的独立预测因素(P=0.31、P=0.81 和 P=0.48)。
接受肩 LR 手术的患者术前功能评分较高,疼痛干扰和抑郁评分较低,而接受 TSA 和 RCR 手术的患者则较低。在跟踪患者手术后的结果时,应考虑这些基线 PROMIS 评分,因为根据潜在的病理情况,特定的评分可能意味着功能和疼痛结果有很大的不同。