Suppr超能文献

单侧与单阶段双侧单间室膝关节置换术后早期并发症比较。

Comparison of early post-operative complications following unilateral or single-stage bilateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

机构信息

John A. Burns School of Medicine, 651 Ilalo Street, Honolulu, HI 96813, USA.

Straub Medical Center, Bone and Joint Center, 888 South King Street, Honolulu, HI 96813, USA.

出版信息

Knee. 2020 Oct;27(5):1406-1410. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2020.07.096. Epub 2020 Aug 19.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) demonstrates excellent functional outcomes and patient satisfaction with low complication rates for single compartment knee arthritis. For patients with bilateral symptoms, single-stage bilateral UKA (SSBUKA) provides an alternative to staged procedures but may risk increased blood loss and systemic complications. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to compare 90-day postoperative complications between unilateral UKA and SSBUKA without exclusion for comorbidities.

METHODS

A retrospective review was completed for 555 consecutive patients having undergone UKA (317 unilateral and 238 bilateral). Data collection included patient demographics and 90-day complications. Independent t-tests (continuous) and Fishers' Exact tests (nominal) were performed to determine differences between unilateral UKA and SSBUKA patients.

RESULTS

The SSBUKA group had more male patients than the unilateral group (51.3% and 43.8%, respectively). There was no difference in age, body mass index or comorbidity classification. More SSBUKA patients experienced nausea than unilateral patients (17.6% and 11.0%), however, no significant differences were observed in the overall incidence of wound or systemic complications, and no transfusions were required. Significantly more unilateral patients (96.2%) were discharged home compared to SSBUKA (63.0%) (p < 0.001). Two SSBUKA (1.7%) and two unilateral UKA (0.6%) patients required readmission within 90-days with systemic complications.

CONCLUSIONS

SSBUKA did not increase the risk of early postoperative systemic or wound complications, when performed in all patients with symptomatic disease without exclusion criteria as compared to patients undergoing unilateral UKA. Therefore, SSBUKA can safely be performed on the majority of patients who present to experienced high volume community hospitals.

摘要

背景

单髁膝关节置换术(UKA)在治疗单间室膝关节骨关节炎时,具有出色的功能结果和患者满意度,且并发症发生率低。对于双侧有症状的患者,同期双侧 UKA(SSBUKA)是分期手术的一种替代方法,但可能会增加出血量和全身并发症的风险。因此,本研究的目的是比较单侧 UKA 和 SSBUKA 治疗单侧膝关节骨关节炎患者在术后 90 天内的并发症,不排除合并症。

方法

对 555 例连续接受 UKA 治疗的患者(317 例单侧和 238 例双侧)进行回顾性研究。数据收集包括患者人口统计学资料和术后 90 天并发症。采用独立样本 t 检验(连续变量)和 Fisher 精确检验(分类变量)比较单侧 UKA 和 SSBUKA 患者之间的差异。

结果

SSBUKA 组男性患者多于单侧 UKA 组(51.3%和 43.8%)。两组患者的年龄、体重指数和合并症分类无差异。SSBUKA 组恶心发生率高于单侧 UKA 组(17.6%和 11.0%),但两组的总体伤口或全身并发症发生率无差异,且均无需输血。单侧 UKA 组(96.2%)患者出院回家的比例明显高于 SSBUKA 组(63.0%)(p<0.001)。有 2 例 SSBUKA(1.7%)和 2 例单侧 UKA(0.6%)患者术后 90 天内因全身并发症需要再次入院。

结论

与单侧 UKA 相比,在所有有症状疾病的患者中,不排除排除标准,同期双侧 UKA 并未增加术后早期全身或伤口并发症的风险。因此,同期双侧 UKA 可安全地用于大多数就诊于高容量社区医院的患者。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验