Associate professor, Department of Oral & Maxillofacial surgery, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran.
Assistant professor, Department of oral and maxillofacial surgery, Tabriz branch Islamic Azad University, Tabriz, Iran.
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2021 Jan;79(1):192-199. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2020.08.040. Epub 2020 Sep 8.
The use of rigid versus semi-rigid intermaxillary fixation (IMF) following subcondylar fractures is controversial. This study aims to investigate whether the "dynamic" elastic fixation technique improves the outcomes, compared to the rigid fixation technique for the treatment of displaced subcondylar fractures in adults.
This nonblinded randomized clinical trial was performed on adult patients with unilateral displaced mandibular subcondylar fractures. Patients were randomly allocated into two groups (n = 17). The primary predictor variable was wire versus elastic IMF. Changes in primary (mouth opening) and secondary (other clinical and radiological) outcomes were recorded. Data were analyzed with the t test and Mann-Whitney test with SPSS software version 20. P-value < .05 considered as significant.
In this study 34 patients (with mean age of 33.03 ± 1.79, 23.5% females & 76.5% males) in two groups (Elastics & Wire) followed up to 6 months. The Elastics group showed significant improvement in mouth opening (primary outcome) after 1 month of follow-up, but the differences were not significant at the end of the study. In terms of secondary outcomes, the ramus height shortening compared to the opposite side revealed favorable improvement in the Elastics group in the period of study. The differences between the two groups in the lateral movement and protrusive movement were significant in favor of the Elastics group. The differences in pain, fracture displacement, and midline deviation between study groups were not significant at the end of the study. Just 1 case with malocclusion was observed in the Wire group. Patients were more satisfied with dynamic nonrigid IMF with elastics.
The results of this study showed that using the dynamic IMF technique is more tolerable, and patients have better functional and clinical outcomes during and at the end treatment.
在下颌骨髁突骨折后使用刚性或半刚性颌间固定(IMF)存在争议。本研究旨在探讨与刚性固定技术相比,“动态”弹性固定技术是否能改善成人移位下颌骨髁突骨折的治疗效果。
这是一项非盲随机临床试验,纳入了单侧移位的成人下颌骨髁突骨折患者。患者被随机分配到两组(n=17)。主要预测变量是钢丝与弹性 IMF。记录主要(张口度)和次要(其他临床和影像学)结果的变化。使用 SPSS 软件版本 20 进行 t 检验和曼-惠特尼检验。P 值<.05 被认为有统计学意义。
本研究共纳入 34 例患者(平均年龄 33.03±1.79 岁,女性占 23.5%,男性占 76.5%),分为两组(弹性组和钢丝组),随访时间为 6 个月。弹性组在 1 个月的随访后张口度(主要结果)显著改善,但在研究结束时差异无统计学意义。在次要结果方面,与对侧相比,髁突高度缩短在研究期间显示出在弹性组的有利改善。在侧向运动和前伸运动方面,两组之间的差异具有统计学意义,有利于弹性组。在研究结束时,两组之间的疼痛、骨折移位和中线偏差无显著差异。钢丝组仅观察到 1 例错合。患者对具有弹性的动态非刚性 IMF 更满意。
本研究结果表明,使用动态 IMF 技术在治疗期间和治疗结束时更耐受,患者的功能和临床结果更好。