Ortiz-Rey José Antonio, Domínguez-de Dios Julia, Pérez-Schoch Miguel, San Miguel-Fraile Pilar, Gómez-de María Carolina
Grupo de Investigación en Uropatología, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Galicia Sur, SERGAS-UVIGO, Vigo, España; Servicio de Anatomía Patológica, Hospital Álvaro Cunqueiro, Vigo, España.
Servicio de Anatomía Patológica, Hospital Álvaro Cunqueiro, Vigo, España.
Rev Esp Patol. 2020 Oct-Dec;53(4):218-225. doi: 10.1016/j.patol.2020.02.005. Epub 2020 Mar 31.
Urologists often submit the resected tissue from vasectomies for histopathological examination in order to confirm the presence of the vas deferens. Microscopy is simple and based on haematoxylin-eosin staining; however, sample artefacts can sometimes cause confusion and immunohistochemistry can be used to identify the vas deferens.
We investigated the utility of immunohistochemical analysis using E-cadherin and GATA-3 to confirm the presence of vas deferens epithelium in 110 vasectomy sections with different artefacts, using monoclonal antibodies and a multimer conjugated with peroxidase based technique; 5 renal arteries and 5 renal veins were stained as negative controls.
Membrane staining was observed for E-cadherin, which was moderate (2.7%) or strong (97.3%) in the vas deferens epithelium in all cases: 35 without artefacts, 7 with denuded epithelium, 56 with compressed/distorted epithelium, 8 with detached epithelium and 4 with displaced epithelium. GATA-3 showed moderate (31%) or strong (69%) nuclear staining in all cases, including the 76 with artefacts. In the control group, arteries and veins were negative for both markers in the endothelium, but GATA-3 occasionally stained lymphocytes in the blood vessel wall.
E-cadherin membrane positivity and GATA-3 nuclear expression are useful for the identification of the vas deferens in vasectomy samples containing artefacts. Vascular endothelium is negative for both markers and any possible GATA-3 staining of the lymphocytes in the blood vessel wall should not be misinterpreted.
泌尿外科医生经常将输精管切除术切除的组织送检进行组织病理学检查,以确认输精管是否存在。显微镜检查简单,基于苏木精 - 伊红染色;然而,样本假象有时会造成混淆,免疫组织化学可用于识别输精管。
我们使用E - 钙黏蛋白和GATA - 3进行免疫组织化学分析,以确认110个存在不同假象的输精管切除术切片中输精管上皮的存在,采用单克隆抗体和基于过氧化物酶的多聚体结合技术;5条肾动脉和5条肾静脉作为阴性对照染色。
观察到E - 钙黏蛋白的膜染色,在所有病例的输精管上皮中为中度(2.7%)或强阳性(97.3%):35例无假象,7例上皮剥脱,56例上皮压缩/变形,8例上皮脱落,4例上皮移位。GATA - 3在所有病例中均显示中度(31%)或强阳性(69%)核染色,包括76例有假象的病例。在对照组中,动脉和静脉内皮中两种标记物均为阴性,但GATA - 3偶尔会使血管壁中的淋巴细胞染色。
E - 钙黏蛋白膜阳性和GATA - 3核表达有助于识别含有假象的输精管切除术样本中的输精管。血管内皮对两种标记物均为阴性,血管壁中淋巴细胞任何可能的GATA - 3染色都不应被误解。