Suppr超能文献

在连续血流左心室辅助装置的时代,心脏同种异体移植排斥反应。

Cardiac allograft rejection in the current era of continuous flow left ventricular assist devices.

机构信息

Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, Barnes-Jewish Hospital, St. Louis, Mo.

Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, Barnes-Jewish Hospital, St. Louis, Mo; Department of Pathology and Immunology, Washington University School of Medicine, Barnes-Jewish Hospital, St. Louis, Mo.

出版信息

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2022 Jan;163(1):124-134.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2020.06.142. Epub 2020 Jul 22.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation has been shown to increase allosensitization before orthotopic heart transplantation, but the influence of LVAD support on posttransplant rejection is controversial. This study examines the postoperative incidence of acute cellular rejection (ACR) in patients bridged with continuous flow LVAD (CF-LVAD) relative to primary transplant (Primary Tx).

METHODS

All patients who underwent orthotopic heart transplantation at our institution between July 2006 and March 2019 were retrospectively reviewed (n = 395). Patients were classified into Primary Tx (n = 145) and CF-LVAD (n = 207) groups. Propensity score matching on 13 covariates implemented a 0.1 caliper logistic model with nearest neighbor 1:1 matching. Development of moderate to severe (ie, 2R/3R) rejection was evaluated using a competing risks model. Potential predictors of 2R/3R ACR were evaluated using Fine-Gray regression on the marginal subdistribution hazard.

RESULTS

Propensity score matching yielded 122 patients in each group (n = 244). At 12 and 24 months, the cumulative incidence of 2R/3R ACR was 17% and 23% for the CF-LVAD group and 26% and 31%, respectively, for the Primary Tx group (P = .170). CF-LVAD was not predictive of 2R/3R rejection on multivariable Fine-Gray regression (subdistribution hazard ratio, 0.73; 95% confidence interval, 0.40-1.33; P = .301). There was no difference in the 5-year incidence of antibody mediated rejection (10% [n = 12] vs 9% [n = 11]; P = .827).

CONCLUSIONS

After adjusting for covariates, CF-LVAD was not associated with an increased risk of moderate to severe ACR during the 24 months after cardiac transplantation. Further investigation is warranted with larger cohorts, but CF-LVAD may have minimal influence on posttransplant ACR.

摘要

目的

左心室辅助装置(LVAD)植入可增加原位心脏移植前的同种异体致敏,但 LVAD 支持对移植后排斥的影响存在争议。本研究检查了我院 2006 年 7 月至 2019 年 3 月期间接受原位心脏移植的患者中,使用连续流 LVAD(CF-LVAD)桥接的患者与原发性移植(Primary Tx)相比,术后急性细胞性排斥(ACR)的发生率。

方法

对我院 2006 年 7 月至 2019 年 3 月期间接受原位心脏移植的所有患者进行回顾性分析(n=395)。患者分为原发性移植组(n=145)和 CF-LVAD 组(n=207)。通过 13 个协变量的倾向评分匹配,采用最近邻 1:1 匹配的 0.1 卡尺逻辑模型进行匹配。采用竞争风险模型评估中度至重度(即 2R/3R)排斥的发生情况。使用边缘亚分布危险度的 Fine-Gray 回归评估 2R/3R ACR 的潜在预测因素。

结果

倾向评分匹配后,每组各有 122 例患者(n=244)。CF-LVAD 组在 12 个月和 24 个月时,2R/3R ACR 的累积发生率分别为 17%和 23%,而原发性移植组分别为 26%和 31%(P=0.170)。多变量 Fine-Gray 回归分析显示,CF-LVAD 并不是 2R/3R 排斥的预测因素(亚分布危险比,0.73;95%置信区间,0.40-1.33;P=0.301)。5 年内抗体介导排斥的发生率无差异(10%[n=12]与 9%[n=11];P=0.827)。

结论

调整协变量后,CF-LVAD 与心脏移植后 24 个月内的中度至重度 ACR 风险增加无关。需要更大的队列进行进一步研究,但 CF-LVAD 可能对移植后 ACR 的影响较小。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验