Wakatsuki Tsubasa, Yamada Norimasa
Graduate School of Health and Sport Sciences, Chukyo University, Toyota, Japan.
School of Health and Sport Sciences, Chukyo University, Toyota, Japan.
Front Psychol. 2020 Sep 2;11:2186. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02186. eCollection 2020.
Intentional and reactive movements are dissimilar in terms of execution time. Previous studies reported that reactive movements are faster than intentional movements ("Bohr's law" or "Gunslinger effect"), however, these studies focused only on hand-reaching tasks, such as pressing buttons. No studies assessed whole-body movements involving movement of the center of mass (CoM). This movement is characterized by many degrees of freedom because it involves many joints and requires more force than the hand-reaching movement. In this study, we determined the differences in the patterns of temporal structure and force exertion to elucidate the mechanism of "Bohr's law" in whole-body movement involving movement of the CoM. Ten participants performed a sidestepping task, which requires at least two steps: (1) an intentional movement, in which the movement started with the participants' own timing; and (2) a reactive movement, in which the movement started the moment a light-emitting diode bulb in front of the participants lit up. We collected data on the ground reaction forces and coordinates of 20 body points. The time of movement onset was calculated and defined based on the ground reaction force, which has the earliest onset compared with velocity and position. The execution time was significantly shorter in the reactive movement condition than in the intentional movement condition (772 vs. 715 ms, = 2.9 × 10). We confirmed that Bohr's law was applicable not only in hand-reaching tasks but also in whole-body movement. Moreover, we identified three phases, including the velocity reversal phenomenon associated with the produced mechanism of Bohr's law, and provided the temporal structure. The difference in the pattern of force exertion accompanying the two styles of motor planning with different accuracies was strongly associated with this motor characteristic. These findings may serve as important basic data to scientifically clarify the mechanism of complex physical tactics implemented in one-on-one dueling in various sports.
有意动作和反应性动作在执行时间方面有所不同。先前的研究报告称,反应性动作比有意动作更快(“玻尔定律”或“枪手效应”),然而,这些研究仅关注伸手动作任务,比如按按钮。没有研究评估涉及质心(CoM)移动的全身动作。这种动作具有多个自由度,因为它涉及多个关节,并且比伸手动作需要更大的力。在本研究中,我们确定了时间结构模式和力施加方面的差异,以阐明在涉及CoM移动的全身动作中“玻尔定律”的机制。十名参与者执行了一项侧步任务,该任务至少需要两步:(1)有意动作,即动作从参与者自己的时机开始;(2)反应性动作,即动作在参与者前方的发光二极管灯泡亮起的瞬间开始。我们收集了地面反作用力和20个身体点坐标的数据。根据与速度和位置相比最早开始的地面反作用力来计算并定义动作开始时间。反应性动作条件下的执行时间显著短于有意动作条件下的执行时间(772对715毫秒, = 2.9 × 10)。我们证实玻尔定律不仅适用于伸手动作任务,也适用于全身动作。此外,我们识别出三个阶段,包括与玻尔定律产生机制相关的速度反转现象,并提供了时间结构。伴随着具有不同精度的两种运动规划方式的力施加模式差异与这种运动特征密切相关。这些发现可能作为重要的基础数据,以科学地阐明在各种运动的一对一决斗中实施的复杂身体战术的机制。