Section of Hygiene, Department of Public Health, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Azienda Ospedaliera Ospedali dei Colli, Monaldi Hospital Pharmacy, Naples, Italy.
Front Immunol. 2020 Sep 8;11:2103. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.02103. eCollection 2020.
Basophils were identified in human peripheral blood by Paul Ehrlich over 140 years ago. Human basophils represent <1% of peripheral blood leukocytes. During the last decades, basophils have been described also in mice, guinea pigs, rabbits, and monkeys. There are many similarities, but also several immunological differences between human and mouse basophils. There are currently several strains of mice with profound constitutive or inducible basophil deficiency useful to prove that these cells have specific roles . However, none of these mice are solely and completely devoid of all basophils. Therefore, the relevance of these findings to humans remains to be established. It has been known for some time that basophils have the propensity to migrate into the site of inflammation. Recent observations indicate that tissue resident basophils contribute to lung development and locally promote M2 polarization of macrophages. Moreover, there is increasing evidence that lung-resident basophils exhibit a specific phenotype, different from circulating basophils. Activated human and mouse basophils synthesize restricted and distinct profiles of cytokines. Human basophils produce several canonical (e.g., VEGFs, angiopoietin 1) and non-canonical (i.e., cysteinyl leukotriene C) angiogenic factors. Activated human and mouse basophils release extracellular DNA traps that may have multiple effects in cancer. Hyperresponsiveness of basophils has been demonstrated in patients with JAK2-positive polycythemia vera. Basophils are present in the immune landscape of human lung adenocarcinoma and pancreatic cancer and can promote inflammation-driven skin tumor growth. The few studies conducted thus far using different models of basophil-deficient mice have provided informative results on the roles of these cells in tumorigenesis. Much more remains to be discovered before we unravel the hitherto mysterious roles of basophils in human and experimental cancers.
140 多年前,Paul Ehrlich 首次在人类外周血中鉴定出嗜碱性粒细胞。人类嗜碱性粒细胞占外周血白细胞的<1%。在过去的几十年中,在小鼠、豚鼠、兔子和猴子中也描述了嗜碱性粒细胞。人类和小鼠嗜碱性粒细胞有许多相似之处,但也存在一些免疫学差异。目前有几种小鼠品系存在严重的固有或诱导性嗜碱性粒细胞缺乏,这有助于证明这些细胞具有特定的作用。然而,这些小鼠都没有完全缺乏所有的嗜碱性粒细胞。因此,这些发现与人类的相关性仍有待确定。众所周知,嗜碱性粒细胞有向炎症部位迁移的倾向。最近的观察表明,组织驻留的嗜碱性粒细胞有助于肺的发育,并局部促进巨噬细胞 M2 极化。此外,越来越多的证据表明,肺驻留的嗜碱性粒细胞表现出一种不同于循环嗜碱性粒细胞的特定表型。激活的人类和小鼠嗜碱性粒细胞合成受限制且独特的细胞因子谱。人类嗜碱性粒细胞产生几种经典(例如,VEGFs、血管生成素 1)和非经典(即,半胱氨酰白三烯 C)血管生成因子。激活的人类和小鼠嗜碱性粒细胞释放细胞外 DNA 陷阱,可能对癌症有多种影响。在 JAK2 阳性真性红细胞增多症患者中已证明嗜碱性粒细胞的高反应性。嗜碱性粒细胞存在于人类肺腺癌和胰腺癌的免疫景观中,并可促进炎症驱动的皮肤肿瘤生长。迄今为止,使用不同的嗜碱性粒细胞缺陷小鼠模型进行的少数研究提供了有关这些细胞在肿瘤发生中的作用的有价值的结果。在我们揭示嗜碱性粒细胞在人类和实验性癌症中迄今为止神秘的作用之前,还有很多需要发现。