Puente Javier, Anido Urbano, Climent Miguel Ángel, Gonzalez-Billalabeitia Enrique, Lainez Nuria, Lambea Julio, Maroto José Pablo, Mendez-Vidal Maria Jose, Montesa Álvaro, Rodriguez Angel, Zambrana Curro, González-Del-Alba Aránzazu
Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Clínico San Carlos (IdISSC), CIBERONC, Madrid, Spain.
Oncology Department, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Santiago, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2020 May 27;12:1758835920920067. doi: 10.1177/1758835920920067. eCollection 2020.
Our aim was to provide practical recommendations on the management of patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) who have progressed after docetaxel plus androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) or abiraterone plus ADT.
Systematic literature review (SLR), nominal group meeting, and Delphi process. A panel of 12 experts was established who defined the scope, users, and sections of the document. We performed an SLR in order to assess the efficacy and safety of available drugs in patients with mCRPC. Abstracts from the American Society of Oncology and European Society for Medical Oncology meetings were also examined. The results were discussed during an expert meeting in which 14 recommendations were generated. The level of agreement with the recommendations was also tested by 13 additional experts following the Delphi process. Recommendations were voted by means of scores ranging from 0 (total disagreement) to 10 (total agreement). We defined agreement when at least 70% of the experts voted ⩾7. Next, we assigned a level of evidence and grade to the recommendation using the Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine Levels of Evidence, following which the final document was drafted.
The literature search did not find any articles meeting the inclusion criteria. Finally, 13 out of 14 recommendations were accepted after two Delphi rounds (two were modified after the first round). They pertain to general and individual case-based treatment recommendations.
In mCRPC patients who have progressed after docetaxel or abiraterone plus ADT in the metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer setting, these recommendations may support treatment decision-making, due to the lack of evidence or other globally accepted sequencing algorithms.
我们的目标是针对多西他赛联合雄激素剥夺治疗(ADT)或阿比特龙联合ADT后病情进展的转移性去势抵抗性前列腺癌(mCRPC)患者的管理提供实用建议。
系统文献综述(SLR)、名义群体会议和德尔菲法。成立了一个由12名专家组成的小组,他们确定了文件的范围、受众和章节。我们进行了SLR,以评估现有药物对mCRPC患者的疗效和安全性。还查阅了美国肿瘤学会和欧洲医学肿瘤学会会议的摘要。在一次专家会议上讨论了结果,会上提出了14条建议。另外13名专家通过德尔菲法对这些建议的认同程度进行了测试。建议通过从0(完全不同意)到10(完全同意)的评分进行投票。当至少70%的专家投票为⩾7时,我们定义为达成共识。接下来,我们使用牛津循证医学中心的证据水平为建议赋予证据水平和等级,随后起草了最终文件。
文献检索未发现符合纳入标准的文章。经过两轮德尔菲法后,14条建议中有13条被接受(第一轮后有两条建议进行了修改)。它们涉及一般和基于个体病例的治疗建议。
在转移性激素敏感性前列腺癌背景下,多西他赛或阿比特龙联合ADT后病情进展的mCRPC患者中,由于缺乏证据或其他全球公认的序贯治疗算法,这些建议可能有助于治疗决策。