Ohadi E, Khoramrooz S S, Kalani B S, Mirzaii M, Pouriran R, Nasrabadi M R B, Darban-Sarokhalil D
Department of Microbiology, School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Cellular and Molecular Research Center and Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Yasuj University of Medical Sciences, Yasuj, Iran.
New Microbes New Infect. 2019 Oct 29;32:100618. doi: 10.1016/j.nmni.2019.100618. eCollection 2019 Nov.
Molecular characterization of isolates from nosocomial and community-acquired infections using accurate, reproducible, and rapid typing methods is essential for the fast identification of prevalent and epidemic strains. Although sequence-based typing is highly effective, PCR-based techniques (such as high-resolution melting curve analysis, HRM) are simpler, less expensive, faster, and can be performed in a single and closed-tube assay format, thereby reducing the risk of contamination. A total of 51 methicillin-resistant (MRSA) ( = 26) and methicillin-sensitive (MSSA) ( = 25) isolates from Karaj ( = 10) and Yasuj ( = 41), Iran, were subjected to HRM. All selected isolates were identified by the standard -typing method. Among the 51 tested isolates, 11 genotype profiles were distinguished from 12 types. Strains t1077 and t1816 exhibited the highest and lowest melting temperatures (81.8°C and 79.4°C), with 46.7% and 39.8% G + C contents, respectively. Strains t706 and t1816, with almost identical G + C contents, had the same HRM genotypes, but their curves differed due to different G + C distributions. Four standard types (strains t030, t037, t701 and t5598) were differentiated correctly and their melting temperatures were 81.2°C, 81.4°C, 80.4°C and 80.1°C, respectively. We demonstrated that HRM profiling is a rapid method which enables the accurate screening of certain strains (especially the endemic ones), and may be used for bacterial surveillance. However, it cannot replace sequence-based typing, especially for newly emerging types, and therefore cannot be used as a standardized global method.
使用准确、可重复且快速的分型方法对医院感染和社区获得性感染分离株进行分子特征分析,对于快速鉴定流行株和暴发株至关重要。尽管基于序列的分型非常有效,但基于PCR的技术(如高分辨率熔解曲线分析,HRM)更简单、成本更低、速度更快,并且可以在单个封闭管分析形式中进行,从而降低污染风险。对来自伊朗卡拉季(n = 10)和亚苏季(n = 41)的总共51株耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)(n = 26)和甲氧西林敏感金黄色葡萄球菌(MSSA)(n = 25)分离株进行了HRM分析。所有选定的分离株均通过标准分型方法进行鉴定。在51株测试分离株中,从12种类型中区分出11种基因型谱。菌株t1077和t1816的熔解温度最高和最低(分别为81.8°C和79.4°C),G + C含量分别为46.7%和39.8%。G + C含量几乎相同的菌株t706和t1816具有相同的HRM基因型,但由于G + C分布不同,它们的曲线有所不同。四种标准类型(菌株t030、t037、t701和t5598)被正确区分,它们的熔解温度分别为81.2°C、81.4°C、80.4°C和80.1°C。我们证明,HRM分析是一种快速方法,能够准确筛选某些菌株(特别是地方流行菌株),可用于细菌监测。然而,它不能替代基于序列的分型,特别是对于新出现的类型,因此不能用作标准化的全球方法。