• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

影响上消化道内镜检查镇静后恢复时间的因素。

Factors Affecting Recovery Time after Sedation for Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.

作者信息

Jin Hwa-Jung, Shin Min-Ho, Myung Eun

机构信息

Department of Public Health, Graduate School, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, Korea.

Department of Preventive Medicine, Chonnnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, Korea.

出版信息

Chonnam Med J. 2020 Sep;56(3):191-195. doi: 10.4068/cmj.2020.56.3.191. Epub 2020 Sep 24.

DOI:10.4068/cmj.2020.56.3.191
PMID:33014758
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7520373/
Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate factors affecting recovery time after sedation for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. The study population included 1310 patients in the national gastric cancer screening program who received sedation for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy from April 15, 2015 to December 31, 2018. Multivariate regression analysis was performed to identify factors related to recovery time. The mean recovery time after examination was 51.2 minutes (SD=13.3). Patients with a history of hypertension had a recovery time 2.59 minutes shorter than that of patients without hypertension (p=0.006, Bonferroni-corrected p=0.108). Patients with a history of stroke had a recovery time 9.41 minutes longer than that of patients without stroke (p=0.007, Bonferroni-corrected p=0.124). Patients who received 3 mg midazolam had a recovery time 2.99 minutes longer than that of patients received 2 mg (p=0.001, Bonferroni-corrected p=0.010), and patients who received less than 6 cc of propofol had a recovery time 2.90 minutes longer than those that of patients received 7-12 cc of propofol (p<0.001, Bonferroni-corrected p=0.005). These results suggest that receiving high doses of midazolam and having a history of stroke are associated with longer recovery times. Patients meeting these criteria should be managed carefully after sedation for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy.

摘要

本研究的目的是调查影响上消化道内镜检查镇静后恢复时间的因素。研究人群包括1310名参加全国胃癌筛查项目的患者,他们在2015年4月15日至2018年12月31日期间接受了上消化道内镜检查镇静。进行多变量回归分析以确定与恢复时间相关的因素。检查后的平均恢复时间为51.2分钟(标准差=13.3)。有高血压病史的患者恢复时间比无高血压病史的患者短2.59分钟(p=0.006,Bonferroni校正p=0.108)。有中风病史的患者恢复时间比无中风病史的患者长9.41分钟(p=0.007,Bonferroni校正p=0.124)。接受3mg咪达唑仑的患者恢复时间比接受2mg咪达唑仑的患者长2.99分钟(p=0.001,Bonferroni校正p=0.010),接受丙泊酚少于6cc的患者恢复时间比接受7-12cc丙泊酚的患者长2.90分钟(p<0.001,Bonferroni校正p=0.005)。这些结果表明,接受高剂量咪达唑仑和有中风病史与较长的恢复时间相关。符合这些标准的患者在上消化道内镜检查镇静后应谨慎管理。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d041/7520373/82c588b3e4d5/cmj-56-191-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d041/7520373/82c588b3e4d5/cmj-56-191-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d041/7520373/82c588b3e4d5/cmj-56-191-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Factors Affecting Recovery Time after Sedation for Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.影响上消化道内镜检查镇静后恢复时间的因素。
Chonnam Med J. 2020 Sep;56(3):191-195. doi: 10.4068/cmj.2020.56.3.191. Epub 2020 Sep 24.
2
Synergistic sedation with oral midazolam as a premedication and intravenous propofol versus intravenous propofol alone in upper gastrointestinal endoscopies in children: a prospective, randomized study.口服咪达唑仑作为术前用药与静脉注射丙泊酚联合用于儿童上消化道内镜检查的协同镇静作用与单独静脉注射丙泊酚的比较:一项前瞻性随机研究。
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2006 Aug;43(2):195-9. doi: 10.1097/01.mpg.0000228099.04702.39.
3
Nurse-administered propofol versus midazolam and meperidine for upper endoscopy in cirrhotic patients.护士给予丙泊酚与咪达唑仑和哌替啶用于肝硬化患者上消化道内镜检查的比较
Am J Gastroenterol. 2003 Nov;98(11):2440-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2003.08668.x.
4
Sub-clinical hepatic encephalopathy in cirrhotic patients is not aggravated by sedation with propofol compared to midazolam: a randomized controlled study.与咪达唑仑相比,丙泊酚镇静不会加重肝硬化患者的亚临床肝性脑病:一项随机对照研究。
J Hepatol. 2011 Jan;54(1):72-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2010.06.023. Epub 2010 Aug 22.
5
The effect of sedation on the quality of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: an investigator-blinded, randomized study comparing propofol with midazolam.镇静对胃镜检查质量的影响:一项研究者设盲的、比较丙泊酚与咪达唑仑的随机研究。
Endoscopy. 2007 Apr;39(4):345-9. doi: 10.1055/s-2006-945195. Epub 2007 Feb 7.
6
Efficiency of propofol versus midazolam and fentanyl sedation at a pediatric teaching hospital: a prospective study.小儿教学医院中丙泊酚与咪达唑仑和芬太尼镇静效果的比较:一项前瞻性研究。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2008 Jun;67(7):1067-75. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2007.11.038. Epub 2008 Mar 26.
7
Propofol sedation for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in patients with liver cirrhosis as an alternative to midazolam to avoid acute deterioration of minimal encephalopathy: a randomized, controlled study.丙泊酚用于肝硬化患者上消化道内镜检查镇静替代咪达唑仑以避免轻微肝性脑病急性恶化:一项随机对照研究
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2009;44(10):1244-51. doi: 10.1080/00365520903194591.
8
Propofol target-controlled infusion for sedated gastrointestinal endoscopy: A comparison of propofol alone versus propofol-fentanyl-midazolam.丙泊酚靶控输注用于镇静胃肠内镜检查:丙泊酚单用与丙泊酚 - 芬太尼 - 咪达唑仑的比较
Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2015 Nov;31(11):580-4. doi: 10.1016/j.kjms.2015.09.004. Epub 2015 Oct 31.
9
A comparison of propofol and midazolam/meperidine sedation in upper gastrointestinal endoscopy.丙泊酚与咪达唑仑/哌替啶在上消化道内镜检查中镇静效果的比较。
Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2016;11(3):178-185. doi: 10.5114/wiitm.2016.61521. Epub 2016 Jul 29.
10
Sedation during upper GI endoscopy in cirrhotic outpatients: a randomized, controlled trial comparing propofol and fentanyl with midazolam and fentanyl.肝硬化门诊患者上消化道内镜检查时的镇静:一项比较丙泊酚和芬太尼与咪达唑仑和芬太尼的随机对照试验。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2011 Jan;73(1):45-51, 51.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.09.025.

引用本文的文献

1
Preoperative anxiety and its impact on surgical outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis.术前焦虑及其对手术结局的影响:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2025 Jan 17;9(1):e33. doi: 10.1017/cts.2025.6. eCollection 2025.
2
Risk Factors for Prolonged Hospital Stay after Endoscopy.内镜检查后住院时间延长的危险因素。
Clin Endosc. 2021 Nov;54(6):851-856. doi: 10.5946/ce.2020.292. Epub 2021 Mar 16.

本文引用的文献

1
Low-dose midazolam and propofol use for conscious sedation during diagnostic endoscopy.低剂量咪达唑仑和丙泊酚用于诊断内镜检查时的清醒镇静。
Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2019 Mar;35(3):160-167. doi: 10.1002/kjm2.12028.
2
Recovery of cognitive function after sedation with propofol for outpatient gastrointestinal endoscopy.异丙酚镇静后对门诊胃肠内镜患者认知功能的恢复。
Saudi J Gastroenterol. 2019 May-Jun;25(3):188-193. doi: 10.4103/sjg.SJG_369_18.
3
Analysis of factors associated with extended recovery time after colonoscopy.分析结肠镜检查后恢复时间延长的相关因素。
PLoS One. 2018 Jun 21;13(6):e0199246. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0199246. eCollection 2018.
4
[Preparation, Evaluation, and Recovery before and after Conscious Sedative Endoscopy].[清醒镇静内镜检查前后的准备、评估及恢复]
Korean J Gastroenterol. 2017 Jan 25;69(1):59-63. doi: 10.4166/kjg.2017.69.1.59.
5
Practice patterns of sedation for colonoscopy.结肠镜检查镇静的实践模式。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2015 Sep;82(3):503-11. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2015.01.041. Epub 2015 Apr 4.
6
Prescribing patterns of the four most commonly used sedatives in endoscopic examination in Korea: propofol, midazolam, diazepam, and lorazepam.韩国内镜检查中四种最常用镇静剂的处方模式:丙泊酚、咪达唑仑、地西泮和劳拉西泮。
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2015 Apr;71(3):565-70. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2015.01.007. Epub 2015 Feb 7.
7
Clinical impact of gastroenterologist-administered propofol during esophagogastroduodenoscopy: a randomized comparison at a single medical clinic.经内镜食管胃十二指肠检查中胃肠病专家给予异丙酚的临床影响:单医疗诊所的随机比较。
Gastric Cancer. 2015 Apr;18(2):326-31. doi: 10.1007/s10120-014-0371-1. Epub 2014 Apr 3.
8
Sedation in gastrointestinal endoscopy: current issues.胃肠内镜检查中的镇静:当前问题。
World J Gastroenterol. 2013 Jan 28;19(4):463-81. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i4.463.
9
AGA Institute review of endoscopic sedation.美国胃肠病学会内镜下镇静审查
Gastroenterology. 2007 Aug;133(2):675-701. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2007.06.002.
10
Current sedation and monitoring practice for colonoscopy: an International Observational Study (EPAGE).当前结肠镜检查的镇静和监测实践:一项国际观察性研究(EPAGE)
Endoscopy. 2006 May;38(5):461-9. doi: 10.1055/s-2006-925368.