• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

10年来西方某中心对大型无蒂结直肠病变评估与管理的改进:经验教训及临床影响

Improving assessment and management of large non-pedunculated colorectal lesions in a Western center over 10 years: lessons learned and clinical impact.

作者信息

Vanella Giuseppe, Coluccio Chiara, Antonelli Giulio, Angeletti Stefano, Micheli Federica, Barbato Antonio, De Rossi Gaia, Marchetti Alessandro, Mereu Elena, Pepe Paola, Corleto Vito Domenico, D'Ambra Giancarlo, Ruggeri Maurizio, Di Giulio Emilio

机构信息

Endoscopy Unit, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Faculty of Medicine and Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, Italy.

出版信息

Endosc Int Open. 2020 Oct;8(10):E1252-E1263. doi: 10.1055/a-1220-6261. Epub 2020 Sep 22.

DOI:10.1055/a-1220-6261
PMID:33015326
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7508662/
Abstract

Outcomes of endoscopic assessment and management of large colorectal (CR) non-pedunculated lesions (LNPLs) are still under evaluation, especially in Western settings. We analyzed the clinical impact of changes in LNPL management over the last decade in a European center. All consecutive LNPLs ≥ 20 mm endoscopically assessed (2008-2019) were retrospectively included. Lesion, patient, and resection characteristics were compared among clinically relevant subgroups. Multivariate logistic regression (for predictors of submucosal invasion [SMI] and recurrence), Kaplan-Meier curves and ROC curves (for temporal cut-offs in trends analyses) were used. A total of 395 LNPLs were included (30 mm [range 20-40]; SMI = 9.6 %; primary endoscopic resection [ER] = 88.4 %). Pseudo-depression and JNET classification independently predicted SMI beyond single morphologies/location. After complete ER, involvement of ileocecal valve/dentate line, piece-meal resection and high-grade dysplasia independently predicted recurrence. Rates of 5-year recurrence-free, surgery-free and cancer-free survival were 77.5 %, 98.6 % and 100 %, respectively, with 93.8 % recurrences endoscopically managed and no death attributable to ER or CR cancer (versus 3.4 % primary surgery mortality). ROC curves identified the period ≥ 2015 (following Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection [ESD] introduction and education on pre-resective lesion assessment) as associated with improved lesions' characterization, increased en-bloc resection of SMI lesions (87.5 % vs 37.5 %; p = 0.0455), reduced primary surgery (7.5 % vs 16.7 %; p = 0.0072), surgical referral of benign lesions (5.1 % vs 14.8 %; p = 0.0019), and recurrences. ESD introduction and educational interventions allowed ER of more complex lesions, offset by increased complementary surgery for complications or intrinsic histological risk. Nevertheless, overall, they have reduced surgery demand and increased appropriateness and safety of LNPL management in our center.

摘要

大肠(CR)大的无蒂病变(LNPLs)的内镜评估和处理结果仍在评估中,尤其是在西方环境中。我们分析了欧洲一家中心在过去十年中LNPLs处理变化的临床影响。回顾性纳入了所有连续的经内镜评估的≥20mm的LNPLs(2008 - 2019年)。比较了临床相关亚组之间的病变、患者和切除特征。使用多变量逻辑回归(用于预测黏膜下浸润[SMI]和复发)、Kaplan - Meier曲线和ROC曲线(用于趋势分析中的时间截断点)。共纳入395个LNPLs(中位大小30mm[范围20 - 40];SMI = 9.6%;初次内镜切除[ER] = 88.4%)。假性凹陷和JNET分类独立预测了单一形态/位置之外的SMI。完全ER后,回盲瓣/齿状线受累、分片切除和高级别异型增生独立预测复发。5年无复发、无手术和无癌生存率分别为77.5%、98.6%和100%,93.8%的复发通过内镜处理,且无因ER或CR癌导致的死亡(相比之下,初次手术死亡率为3.4%)。ROC曲线确定≥2015年期间(在内镜黏膜下剥离术[ESD]引入以及对术前病变评估进行教育之后)与病变特征改善、SMI病变整块切除增加(87.5%对37.5%;p = 0.0455)、初次手术减少(7.5%对16.7%;p = 0.0072)、良性病变的手术转诊减少(5.1%对14.8%;p = 0.0019)以及复发减少相关。ESD的引入和教育干预使得更复杂的病变能够进行ER,但因并发症或内在组织学风险导致的补充手术增加而有所抵消。然而,总体而言,它们减少了手术需求,并提高了我们中心LNPLs处理的适宜性和安全性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/592d/7508662/09e943fefdbf/10-1055-a-1220-6261-i1842ei1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/592d/7508662/09e943fefdbf/10-1055-a-1220-6261-i1842ei1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/592d/7508662/09e943fefdbf/10-1055-a-1220-6261-i1842ei1.jpg

相似文献

1
Improving assessment and management of large non-pedunculated colorectal lesions in a Western center over 10 years: lessons learned and clinical impact.10年来西方某中心对大型无蒂结直肠病变评估与管理的改进:经验教训及临床影响
Endosc Int Open. 2020 Oct;8(10):E1252-E1263. doi: 10.1055/a-1220-6261. Epub 2020 Sep 22.
2
AGA Institute Clinical Practice Update: Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection in the United States.AGA 研究所临床实践更新:美国内镜黏膜下剥离术。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 Jan;17(1):16-25.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2018.07.041. Epub 2018 Aug 2.
3
Using Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection as a Routine Component of the Standard Treatment Strategy for Large and Complex Colorectal Lesions in a Western Tertiary Referral Unit.在西方三级转诊单位中,将内镜黏膜下剥离术作为大型复杂结直肠病变标准治疗策略的常规组成部分。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2018 Jun;61(6):743-750. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000001081.
4
Non-polypoid colorectal neoplasms: Classification, therapy and follow-up.非息肉样结直肠肿瘤:分类、治疗及随访
World J Gastroenterol. 2015 May 7;21(17):5149-57. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i17.5149.
5
Why attempt en bloc resection of non-pedunculated colorectal adenomas? A systematic review of the prevalence of superficial submucosal invasive cancer after endoscopic submucosal dissection.为什么要尝试整块切除无蒂结直肠腺瘤?内镜黏膜下剥离术后浅层黏膜下浸润性癌发生率的系统评价。
Gut. 2018 Aug;67(8):1464-1474. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2017-315103. Epub 2017 Dec 5.
6
Long-term outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal epithelial neoplasms.内镜黏膜下剥离术治疗结直肠上皮性肿瘤的长期疗效。
Endoscopy. 2010 Sep;42(9):723-9. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1255675. Epub 2010 Aug 30.
7
Endoscopic submucosal dissection of colorectal neoplasms: an audit of its safety and efficacy in a single tertiary centre in Singapore.内镜黏膜下剥离术治疗结直肠肿瘤:在新加坡一家三级医疗中心的安全性和疗效评估。
Singapore Med J. 2019 Oct;60(10):526-531. doi: 10.11622/smedj.2019022. Epub 2019 Feb 18.
8
Preoperative indicators of failure of en bloc resection or perforation in colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: implications for lesion stratification by technical difficulties during stepwise training.结直肠内镜黏膜下剥离术整块切除或穿孔失败的术前预测指标:逐步培训过程中技术难度对病变分层的影响。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2016 May;83(5):954-62. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2015.08.024. Epub 2015 Aug 20.
9
Therapeutic outcomes in 1000 cases of endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric neoplasms: Korean ESD Study Group multicenter study.1000例早期胃肿瘤内镜黏膜下剥离术的治疗结果:韩国ESD研究组多中心研究
Gastrointest Endosc. 2009 Jun;69(7):1228-35. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2008.09.027. Epub 2009 Feb 27.
10
Long-term clinical outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal neoplasms in 423 cases: a retrospective study.423例大肠肿瘤内镜黏膜下剥离术的长期临床结局:一项回顾性研究
Endoscopy. 2017 Mar;49(3):233-242. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-124366. Epub 2017 Jan 20.

本文引用的文献

1
Curriculum for endoscopic submucosal dissection training in Europe: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Position Statement.内镜黏膜下剥离术培训课程在欧洲:欧洲胃肠道内镜学会(ESGE)立场声明。
Endoscopy. 2019 Oct;51(10):980-992. doi: 10.1055/a-0996-0912. Epub 2019 Aug 30.
2
Reliability of Japan Narrow-Band Imaging Expert Team Classification for the Diagnosis of Colorectal Neoplasms: A Pilot Study.日本窄带成像专家小组分类法诊断结直肠肿瘤的可靠性:一项初步研究。
Digestion. 2020;101(5):638-643. doi: 10.1159/000501960. Epub 2019 Aug 8.
3
Objective validity of the Japan Narrow-Band Imaging Expert Team classification system for the differential diagnosis of colorectal polyps.
日本窄带成像专家团队分类系统对结直肠息肉鉴别诊断的客观有效性。
Dig Endosc. 2019 Sep;31(5):544-551. doi: 10.1111/den.13393. Epub 2019 May 7.
4
Invasive pit pattern, macronodule and depression are predictive factors of submucosal invasion in colorectal laterally spreading tumours from a Western population.侵袭性凹陷模式、大结节和凹陷是西方人群结直肠侧向扩散肿瘤黏膜下浸润的预测因素。
United European Gastroenterol J. 2018 Dec;6(10):1569-1577. doi: 10.1177/2050640618804713. Epub 2018 Oct 5.
5
Endoscopic submucosal dissection of 301 large colorectal neoplasias: outcome and learning curve from a specialized center in Europe.301例大肠大型肿瘤的内镜黏膜下剥离术:来自欧洲一家专业中心的结果及学习曲线
Endosc Int Open. 2018 Nov;6(11):E1340-E1348. doi: 10.1055/a-0733-3668. Epub 2018 Nov 7.
6
AGA Institute Clinical Practice Update: Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection in the United States.AGA 研究所临床实践更新:美国内镜黏膜下剥离术。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 Jan;17(1):16-25.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2018.07.041. Epub 2018 Aug 2.
7
Endoscopic subtypes of colorectal laterally spreading tumors (LSTs) and the risk of submucosal invasion: a meta-analysis.内镜下结直肠侧向发育型肿瘤(LST)亚型与黏膜下浸润风险:一项荟萃分析。
Endoscopy. 2018 Mar;50(3):263-282. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-121144. Epub 2017 Nov 27.
8
Quality Matters: Improving the Quality of Care for Patients With Complex Colorectal Polyps.质量至关重要:提高复杂结直肠息肉患者的护理质量。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2018 Mar;113(3):317-321. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2017.409. Epub 2017 Nov 7.
9
Resection outcomes and recurrence rates of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) and hybrid ESD for colorectal tumors in a single Italian center.单一家意中心的内镜黏膜下剥离术(ESD)和杂交 ESD 治疗结直肠肿瘤的切除效果和复发率。
Surg Endosc. 2018 May;32(5):2328-2339. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5928-8. Epub 2017 Nov 2.
10
Wide-field endoscopic mucosal resection versus endoscopic submucosal dissection for laterally spreading colorectal lesions: a cost-effectiveness analysis.宽视野内镜下黏膜切除术与内镜黏膜下剥离术治疗结直肠侧向发育型肿瘤的成本效果分析。
Gut. 2018 Nov;67(11):1965-1973. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2017-313823. Epub 2017 Oct 7.