• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

缓和医疗咨询影响心力衰竭患者的死亡方式和地点。

Palliative Care Consultation Affects How and Where Heart Failure Patients Die.

机构信息

Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, 6595University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.

Department of Medicine, 6595Veterans Health Administration Pittsburgh Health System, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.

出版信息

Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2021 Jul;38(7):807-811. doi: 10.1177/1049909120963565. Epub 2020 Oct 5.

DOI:10.1177/1049909120963565
PMID:33016083
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Determine the role of palliative care on terminal code status and setting of death for those with heart failure.

BACKGROUND

Although palliative care consultation (PCC) has increased for many conditions, PCC has not increased in those with cardiovascular disease. While it has been shown that the majority of those with heart failure die in medical facilities, the impact of PCC on terminal code status and setting of death requires further analysis.

METHODS

Patients admitted with heart failure between 2014-2015 at an academic VA Healthcare System were reviewed. Primary outcome was terminal code status. Secondary outcomes included setting of death, hospice utilization, and mortality scores. Student t-testing and Chi-square testing were performed where appropriate.

RESULTS

334 patients were admitted with heart failure and had a median follow up time of 4.3 years. 196 patients died, with 122 (62%) receiving PCC and 74 (38%) without PCC. Patients were more likely to have terminal code statuses of comfort measures with PCC (OR = 4.6, p = 0.002), and less likely to be full code (OR = 0.09, p < 0.001). 146 patients had documented settings of death and were more likely to receive hospice services with PCC (OR 6.76, p < 0.001). A patient's chance of dying at home was not increased with PCC (OR 0.49, p = 0.07), but they were more likely to die with inpatient hospice (OR = 17.03; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Heart failure patients who received PCC are more likely to die with more defined care preferences and with hospice services. This does not translate to dying at home.

摘要

目的

确定姑息治疗对心力衰竭患者终末代码状态和死亡设定的作用。

背景

尽管姑息治疗咨询(PCC)在许多情况下有所增加,但心血管疾病患者的 PCC 并未增加。虽然大多数心力衰竭患者都在医疗机构死亡,但姑息治疗对终末代码状态和死亡设定的影响仍需要进一步分析。

方法

回顾了 2014-2015 年在一家学术退伍军人事务医疗保健系统因心力衰竭入院的患者。主要结局是终末代码状态。次要结局包括死亡设定、临终关怀利用和死亡率评分。适当情况下进行学生 t 检验和卡方检验。

结果

334 例心力衰竭患者入院,中位随访时间为 4.3 年。196 例患者死亡,其中 122 例(62%)接受了 PCC,74 例(38%)未接受 PCC。接受 PCC 的患者更有可能处于舒适治疗的终末代码状态(OR=4.6,p=0.002),而不太可能是全面代码(OR=0.09,p<0.001)。146 例患者有记录的死亡设定,接受 PCC 的患者更有可能接受临终关怀服务(OR=6.76,p<0.001)。接受 PCC 的患者在家中死亡的机会并没有增加(OR=0.49,p=0.07),但他们更有可能在住院临终关怀中死亡(OR=17.03;p<0.001)。

结论

接受 PCC 的心力衰竭患者更有可能在临终关怀服务的支持下,按照更明确的护理偏好死亡。但这并不意味着他们会在家中死亡。

相似文献

1
Palliative Care Consultation Affects How and Where Heart Failure Patients Die.缓和医疗咨询影响心力衰竭患者的死亡方式和地点。
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2021 Jul;38(7):807-811. doi: 10.1177/1049909120963565. Epub 2020 Oct 5.
2
The earlier the better: the role of palliative care consultation on aggressive end of life care, hospice utilization, and advance care planning documentation among gynecologic oncology patients.尽早咨询:姑息治疗咨询在妇科肿瘤患者积极的临终关怀、临终关怀利用和预先护理计划文件方面的作用。
Support Care Cancer. 2019 May;27(5):1927-1934. doi: 10.1007/s00520-018-4457-x. Epub 2018 Sep 12.
3
Associations between Timing of Palliative Care Consults and Family Evaluation of Care for Veterans Who Die in a Hospice/Palliative Care Unit.临终关怀/姑息治疗病房中死亡的退伍军人的姑息治疗咨询时机与家属护理评估之间的关联。
J Palliat Med. 2017 Jul;20(7):745-751. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2016.0477. Epub 2017 May 4.
4
Evaluating the effects of inpatient palliative care consultations on subsequent hospice use and place of death in patients with advanced GI cancers.评估在晚期胃肠道癌症患者中,住院姑息治疗咨询对随后使用临终关怀服务和死亡地点的影响。
J Oncol Pract. 2014 May;10(3):174-7. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2014.001429.
5
Hospice assist at home: does the integration of hospice care in primary healthcare support patients to die in their preferred location - A retrospective cross-sectional evaluation study.居家临终关怀:初级医疗保健中临终关怀的整合是否有助于支持患者在其首选地点离世——一项回顾性横断面评估研究。
Palliat Med. 2016 Jun;30(6):580-6. doi: 10.1177/0269216315626353. Epub 2016 Jan 26.
6
Impact of Palliative Care Screening and Consultation in the ICU: A Multihospital Quality Improvement Project.重症监护病房姑息治疗筛查与会诊的影响:一项多医院质量改进项目
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2017 Jan;53(1):5-12.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2016.08.003. Epub 2016 Oct 5.
7
Need for hospice and palliative care services in patients with end-stage heart failure treated with intermittent infusion of inotropes.接受间歇性输注正性肌力药物治疗的终末期心力衰竭患者对临终关怀和姑息治疗服务的需求。
Clin Cardiol. 2004 Jan;27(1):23-8. doi: 10.1002/clc.4960270107.
8
Do Hispanics prefer to be full code at the end of life? The impact of palliative care consults on clarifying code status preferences and hospice referrals in Spanish-speaking patients.西班牙语裔在生命末期更倾向于全医嘱吗?缓和医疗咨询对澄清西班牙语裔患者的医嘱偏好和转介至临终关怀的影响。
Palliat Support Care. 2021 Apr;19(2):193-197. doi: 10.1017/S1478951520000425.
9
Factors associated with the time to first palliative care consultation in Lebanese cancer patients.与黎巴嫩癌症患者首次姑息治疗咨询时间相关的因素。
Support Care Cancer. 2019 Apr;27(4):1529-1533. doi: 10.1007/s00520-018-4543-0. Epub 2018 Nov 7.
10
Challenges for Patients Dying of Heart Failure and Cancer.心力衰竭和癌症患者的挑战。
Circ Heart Fail. 2022 Dec;15(12):e009922. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.122.009922. Epub 2022 Nov 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Multidisciplinary Care for Anaplastic Thyroid Cancer-End-of-Life Care as a Standard of Care.间变性甲状腺癌的多学科护理——临终关怀作为护理标准。
Laryngoscope. 2025 Sep;135(9):3444-3451. doi: 10.1002/lary.32243. Epub 2025 May 8.
2
Use of Palliative Care Among Adults With Newly Diagnosed Heart Failure: Insights From a US National Insured Patient Sample.新诊断心力衰竭成人中姑息治疗的使用:来自美国全国参保患者样本的见解。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2024 Sep 3;13(17):e035459. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.124.035459. Epub 2024 Aug 29.