Department of Public Health Sciences, 4257Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
Health Services and Policy Research Institute, 4257Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
Can J Psychiatry. 2021 Jul;66(7):603-615. doi: 10.1177/0706743720961733. Epub 2020 Oct 5.
Concerns surrounding the mental health and well-being of Canadian postsecondary students have increased in recent years, with data suggesting increases in the prevalence of self-reported stress and psychological distress. Strategies to address postsecondary mental health have emerged at the national, provincial, and institutional levels. While reviews of the academic literature on the subject have been conducted, a detailed review of the grey literature has not. The objective of this study was to map the current state of grey literature related to current or recommended action supporting postsecondary mental health and well-being in Canada, with a focus on policy documents and guiding frameworks.
We conducted a review following Arksey and O'Malley's 5-step framework for scoping reviews, as well as the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Our search was restricted to documents with a primary focus on postsecondary mental health, a national or provincial scope, and publication date between 2000 and 2019.
While a national policy or guiding framework applicable to all postsecondary institutions across Canada does not yet exist, recommendations for policy at both the national and provincial levels were well aligned, emphasizing the need for a comprehensive approach to addressing mental health services through the use of a whole-campus approach that encompasses both upstream and downstream services.
Postsecondary sector stakeholders should consider how existing policy documents and guiding frameworks can be used to inform evidence-based, institutionally specific action on postsecondary mental health. More work is required to align the fragmented action occurring across Canada and incentivize postsecondary institutions to create a sustainable, effective strategy to address the increasingly complex and unique mental health needs of their students, staff, and faculty.
近年来,加拿大高等教育学生的心理健康和福祉问题备受关注,数据显示,自我报告的压力和心理困扰的患病率有所增加。已经在国家、省和机构层面上提出了应对高等教育心理健康问题的策略。虽然已经对该主题的学术文献进行了综述,但尚未对灰色文献进行详细综述。本研究的目的是绘制与加拿大当前或推荐的支持高等教育心理健康和福祉的行动相关的灰色文献的现状,重点是政策文件和指导框架。
我们按照 Arksey 和 O'Malley 的 5 步范围综述框架以及系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目进行了综述。我们的搜索仅限于主要关注高等教育心理健康、国家或省级范围以及 2000 年至 2019 年期间出版的文件。
虽然加拿大尚未制定适用于所有高等教育机构的国家政策或指导框架,但国家和省级层面的政策建议非常一致,强调需要通过使用涵盖上游和下游服务的全校园方法来全面解决心理健康服务问题。
高等教育部门利益相关者应考虑如何利用现有政策文件和指导框架为高等教育心理健康方面的循证、特定机构的行动提供信息。需要做更多的工作来协调加拿大各地分散的行动,并激励高等教育机构制定可持续、有效的策略,以满足学生、员工和教师日益复杂和独特的心理健康需求。