• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

表土施石灰降低可可幼苗对镉的吸收,但增强了亚表层的吸收。

Surface soil liming reduces cadmium uptake in cacao seedlings but subsurface uptake is enhanced.

机构信息

Division of Soil and Water Management, KU Leuven, Kasteelpark Arenberg 20, Heverlee, BE, 3001, Belgium.

Facultad de Ciencias de la Vida, Escuela Superior Politécnica del Litoral (ESPOL), Campus Gustavo Galindo Km. 30.5 Vía Perimetral, P.O. Box 09-01-5863, Guayaquil, Ecuador.

出版信息

J Environ Qual. 2020 Sep;49(5):1359-1369. doi: 10.1002/jeq2.20123. Epub 2020 Aug 3.

DOI:10.1002/jeq2.20123
PMID:33016446
Abstract

Cadmium concentrations in cacao (Theobroma cacao L.) beans from South America often exceed trade limits. Liming soil is advocated as a remediation option, but amendments cannot be incorporated into the entire root zone without harming the trees. An experiment was set up to identify how Cd uptake varies within the root zone when surface and subsurface soil layers are either limed or not. The experiment used 22-cm-height pots with top and bottom layers using surface and subsurface soil samples from a cacao field. The potted soils were either surface limed or not or fully limed and layers spiked with stable Cd isotope in various combinations to trace the plant Cd provenance. The root distribution was neither affected by liming nor by soil source; 70% of the root biomass was present in the top layer. Plants grown on the fully limed surface soil had 1.7 times lower Cd concentrations in leaves than the unlimed treatments, whereas this concentration was 1.2 times lower when only the top layer was limed (surface soil used in both layers). The isotope dilution data showed that surface soil liming enhanced Cd uptake from the unlimed bottom layer compared with the unlimed soil, suggesting compensating mechanisms. The pots containing surface soil over subsurface soil also showed that compensating effect but, due to lower phytoavailable Cd in the subsurface soil, surface liming still effectively reduced foliar Cd. We conclude that liming might be a feasible mitigation strategy, but its effectiveness is limited when Cd phytoavailability remains untreated in the subsurface layer.

摘要

南美的可可豆(可可树)中的镉含量经常超过贸易限制。提倡用石灰改良土壤作为一种修复方法,但如果不伤害树木,就不能将改良剂掺入整个根区。进行了一项实验,以确定当表层和次表层土壤分别进行石灰处理或不进行石灰处理时,根区内部的镉吸收量如何变化。该实验使用了 22 厘米高的花盆,上下层分别使用了可可田的表层和次表层土壤样本。盆栽土壤要么进行石灰处理,要么不进行处理,要么完全进行石灰处理,并以各种组合分层添加稳定的镉同位素,以追踪植物的镉来源。根的分布既不受石灰处理的影响,也不受土壤来源的影响;70%的根生物量存在于上层。与未施石灰的处理相比,生长在完全石灰处理的表层土壤上的植物叶片中的镉浓度低 1.7 倍,而当仅顶层进行石灰处理(两层均使用表层土壤)时,该浓度低 1.2 倍。同位素稀释数据表明,与未施石灰的底层相比,表层土壤石灰处理增强了对未施石灰的底层的镉吸收,表明存在补偿机制。含有表层土壤覆盖次表层土壤的花盆也表现出了这种补偿效应,但由于次表层土壤中可利用的镉含量较低,表层石灰处理仍能有效地降低叶片中的镉含量。我们得出的结论是,石灰处理可能是一种可行的缓解策略,但当次表层的镉植物可利用性仍未得到处理时,其效果是有限的。

相似文献

1
Surface soil liming reduces cadmium uptake in cacao seedlings but subsurface uptake is enhanced.表土施石灰降低可可幼苗对镉的吸收,但增强了亚表层的吸收。
J Environ Qual. 2020 Sep;49(5):1359-1369. doi: 10.1002/jeq2.20123. Epub 2020 Aug 3.
2
Soil amendments to reduce cadmium in cacao (Theobroma cacao L.): A comprehensive field study in Ecuador.土壤改良剂降低可可(Theobroma cacao L.)中的镉:厄瓜多尔的综合田间研究。
Chemosphere. 2023 May;324:138318. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2023.138318. Epub 2023 Mar 10.
3
Concentration of cadmium in cacao beans and its relationship with soil cadmium in southern Ecuador.厄瓜多尔南部可可豆中的镉浓度及其与土壤镉的关系。
Sci Total Environ. 2015 Nov 15;533:205-14. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.06.106. Epub 2015 Jul 11.
4
Soil properties and agronomic factors affecting cadmium concentrations in cacao beans: A nationwide survey in Ecuador.土壤特性和农艺因素对可可豆中镉浓度的影响:厄瓜多尔全国性调查。
Sci Total Environ. 2019 Feb 1;649:120-127. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.08.292. Epub 2018 Aug 23.
5
Effect of soil characteristics on cadmium absorption and plant growth of Theobroma cacao L. seedlings.土壤特性对可可(Theobroma cacao L.)幼苗吸收镉和生长的影响。
J Sci Food Agric. 2021 Oct;101(13):5437-5445. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.11192. Epub 2021 Mar 18.
6
Evaluation of soil amendments as a remediation alternative for cadmium-contaminated soils under cacao plantations.评估土壤改良剂作为可可种植园镉污染土壤修复替代方案的效果。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2016 Sep;23(17):17571-80. doi: 10.1007/s11356-016-6931-7. Epub 2016 May 27.
7
Cadmium bioaccumulation and gastric bioaccessibility in cacao: A field study in areas impacted by oil activities in Ecuador.可可中镉的生物累积及胃生物可给性:厄瓜多尔受石油活动影响地区的一项实地研究。
Environ Pollut. 2017 Oct;229:950-963. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2017.07.080. Epub 2017 Aug 3.
8
The effectiveness of soil amendments, biochar and lime, in mitigating cadmium bioaccumulation in Theobroma cacao L.土壤改良剂、生物炭和石灰减轻可可树体内镉生物累积的效果
Sci Total Environ. 2019 Nov 25;693:133563. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.07.369. Epub 2019 Jul 23.
9
Revealing the pathways of cadmium uptake and translocation in cacao trees (Theobroma cacao L.): A Cd pulse-chase experiment.揭示可可树(Theobroma cacao L.)中镉吸收和转运的途径:Cd 脉冲追踪实验。
Sci Total Environ. 2023 Apr 15;869:161816. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.161816. Epub 2023 Jan 26.
10
Cadmium accumulation and allocation in different cacao cultivars.镉在不同可可品种中的积累与分配。
Sci Total Environ. 2019 Aug 15;678:660-670. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.05.001. Epub 2019 May 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Microbial bioindicators associated with cadmium uptake in sixteen genotypes of .与16种基因型中镉吸收相关的微生物生物指示物 。(原文似乎不完整)
Heliyon. 2025 Jan 10;11(2):e41890. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2025.e41890. eCollection 2025 Jan 30.
2
Reducing cadmium bioaccumulation in using biochar: basis for scaling-up to field.利用生物炭降低镉的生物累积:扩大到田间规模的依据。
Heliyon. 2022 Jun 23;8(6):e09790. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09790. eCollection 2022 Jun.
3
Drivers of cadmium accumulation in Theobroma cacao L. beans: A quantitative synthesis of soil-plant relationships across the Cacao Belt.
可可豆中镉积累的驱动因素:可可带土壤-植物关系的定量综合。
PLoS One. 2022 Feb 2;17(2):e0261989. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0261989. eCollection 2022.