Suppr超能文献

全球研究联盟 N O 室方法学指南:通量计算。

Global Research Alliance N O chamber methodology guidelines: Flux calculations.

机构信息

Soil and Water Management Research Unit, USDA-ARS, 1991 Upper Buford Circle, 439 Borlaug Hall, St. Paul, MN, 55108, USA.

Dep. of Agroecology and Environment, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, Univ. of Aarhus, PO Box 50, Tjele, DK8830, Denmark.

出版信息

J Environ Qual. 2020 Sep;49(5):1141-1155. doi: 10.1002/jeq2.20118. Epub 2020 May 26.

Abstract

A critical step in determining soil-to-atmosphere nitrous oxide (N O) exchange using non-steady-state chambers is converting collected gas concentration versus time data to flux values using a flux calculation (FC) scheme. It is well documented that different FC schemes can produce different flux estimates for a given set of data. Available schemes differ in their theoretical basis, computational requirements, and performance in terms of both accuracy and precision. Nonlinear schemes tend to increase accuracy compared with linear regression but can also decrease precision. The chamber bias correction method can be used if soil physical data are available, but this introduces additional sources of error. Here, the essential theoretical and practical aspects of the most commonly used FC schemes are described as a basis for their selection and use. A gold standard approach for application and selection of FC schemes is presented, as well as alternative approaches based on availability of soil physical property data and intensity of sample collection during each chamber deployment. Additional criteria for scheme selection are provided in the form of an error analysis tool that quantifies performance with respect to both accuracy and precision based on chamber dimensions and sampling duration, soil properties, and analytical measurement precision. Example error analyses are presented for hypothetical conditions illustrating how such analysis can be used to guide FC scheme selection, estimate bias, and inform design of chambers and sampling regimes.

摘要

使用非稳态室确定土壤-大气氧化亚氮(N2O)交换的关键步骤是使用通量计算(FC)方案将收集的气体浓度随时间变化的数据转换为通量值。已有文献充分证明,对于给定的数据集,不同的 FC 方案可能会产生不同的通量估计值。现有的方案在理论基础、计算要求以及准确性和精密度方面的性能存在差异。与线性回归相比,非线性方案往往会提高准确性,但也会降低精密度。如果有土壤物理数据可用,则可以使用腔室偏置校正方法,但这会引入额外的误差源。本文描述了最常用的 FC 方案的基本理论和实际方面,作为其选择和使用的基础。提出了一种 FC 方案应用和选择的黄金标准方法,以及基于每个腔室部署期间土壤物理特性数据和样本采集强度的替代方法。还提供了方案选择的其他标准,以误差分析工具的形式,根据腔室尺寸和采样持续时间、土壤特性以及分析测量精度,针对准确性和精密度量化性能。针对假设条件提出了示例误差分析,说明了如何使用这种分析来指导 FC 方案选择、估计偏差以及为腔室和采样方案设计提供信息。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验