• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

动态腿长测量是一种检测解剖学腿长差异的有效方法。

Dynamic leg length measurement is a valid method for detecting anatomic leg length discrepancy.

出版信息

Technol Health Care. 2021;29(1):175-185. doi: 10.3233/THC-192006.

DOI:10.3233/THC-192006
PMID:33016897
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Even though the importance of leg length discrepancy (LLD), with its potential of causing several pathological conditions or gait deviations, is well known, measuring LLD is still challenging with limited reliability and validity.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the capability of the dynamic leg length (DLL) measurement in detecting the presence of anatomic LLD.

METHODS

A lower limb x-ray was performed on 15 participants with suspected LLD in addition to a gait analysis study using a motion analysis system to measure DLL (the absolute distance from the hip joint centre to the heel, to the ankle joint centre and to the forefoot). Average DLLs were compared between sides for symmetry by the paired t-test at 51 sample points during the gait cycle in conjunction with the differences between the sides based on the maximal stance phase and minimal swing phase DLLs. Differences were correlated with anatomic LLD by Pearson correlation.

RESULTS

No significant differences in DLLs between sides throughout the gait cycle were found. Significant differences between sides were found between the maximal stance and minimal swing phase DLLs.

CONCLUSIONS

DLL measurement is capable of detecting an anatomic leg length difference based on functional changes in leg length and functional discrepancy.

摘要

背景

尽管腿长差异(LLD)的重要性及其导致多种病理状况或步态偏差的潜在风险已得到广泛认可,但由于其可靠性和有效性有限,测量 LLD 仍然具有挑战性。

目的

评估动态腿长(DLL)测量在检测解剖学 LLD 存在方面的能力。

方法

对 15 名疑似 LLD 的参与者进行下肢 X 光检查,并使用运动分析系统进行步态分析研究,以测量 DLL(髋关节中心到脚跟、踝关节中心到前脚掌的绝对距离)。在步态周期的 51 个采样点,通过配对 t 检验比较双侧 DLL 的对称性,同时比较最大站立相和最小摆动相 DLL 之间的双侧差异。差异与解剖学 LLD 之间通过 Pearson 相关进行相关性分析。

结果

在整个步态周期中,双侧 DLL 之间未发现显著差异。在最大站立相和最小摆动相 DLL 之间发现了双侧的显著差异。

结论

DLL 测量能够根据腿长和功能差异的功能性变化检测解剖学腿长差异。

相似文献

1
Dynamic leg length measurement is a valid method for detecting anatomic leg length discrepancy.动态腿长测量是一种检测解剖学腿长差异的有效方法。
Technol Health Care. 2021;29(1):175-185. doi: 10.3233/THC-192006.
2
Measuring Dynamic Leg Length during Normal Gait.测量正常步态下的动态腿长。
Sensors (Basel). 2018 Nov 29;18(12):4191. doi: 10.3390/s18124191.
3
The effect of simulated leg length discrepancy on lower limb biomechanics during gait.模拟腿长差异对步态期间下肢生物力学的影响。
Gait Posture. 2018 Mar;61:73-80. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2017.12.024. Epub 2017 Dec 28.
4
Detecting the presence of leg length discrepancy based on gait deviations and functional measurement of leg length during walking.基于步态偏差和行走过程中腿长的功能测量来检测腿长差异的存在。
BMJ Case Rep. 2017 Aug 7;2017:bcr-2017-219645. doi: 10.1136/bcr-2017-219645.
5
Gait patterns in children with limb length discrepancy.肢体长度不等的儿童的步态模式。
J Pediatr Orthop. 2015 Apr-May;35(3):280-4. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000000262.
6
Anatomical leg length discrepancy in children: Can it be accurately determined using 3-D motion capturing?儿童解剖性腿长差异:3D 运动捕捉技术能否准确测量?
Gait Posture. 2024 Mar;109:311-317. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2024.02.013. Epub 2024 Feb 17.
7
Prediction of mild anatomical leg length discrepancy based on gait kinematics and linear regression model.基于步态运动学和线性回归模型预测轻度解剖学腿长差异
Gait Posture. 2019 Jan;67:117-121. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2018.09.027. Epub 2018 Sep 29.
8
Relationship and significance of gait deviations associated with limb length discrepancy: A systematic review.与肢体长度差异相关的步态偏差的关系及意义:一项系统综述。
Gait Posture. 2017 Sep;57:115-123. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2017.05.028. Epub 2017 May 31.
9
Predictor index of functional limb length discrepancy.功能肢体长度差异的预测指标。
J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2020 Jan-Apr;28(2):2309499020941659. doi: 10.1177/2309499020941659.
10
A novel measurement approach to dynamic change of limb length discrepancy using deep learning and wearable sensors.一种使用深度学习和可穿戴传感器测量肢体长度差异动态变化的新方法。
Sci Prog. 2024 Jan-Mar;107(1):368504241236345. doi: 10.1177/00368504241236345.

引用本文的文献

1
The reliability of clinical tools with and without ultrasound guidance to measure leg-length inequality.有超声引导和无超声引导的临床工具测量腿长不等的可靠性。
Ultrasound. 2024 May;32(2):86-93. doi: 10.1177/1742271X231195741. Epub 2023 Sep 28.