• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹部实质脏器损伤的血管栓塞治疗:血管栓塞治疗的延迟是否会影响结果?

Angioembolization in intra-abdominal solid organ injury: Does delay in angioembolization affect outcomes?

机构信息

From the Division of Trauma, Critical Care, Emergency Surgery, and Burns, Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona.

出版信息

J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2020 Oct;89(4):723-729. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000002851.

DOI:10.1097/TA.0000000000002851
PMID:33017133
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Angioembolization (AE) is an integral component in multidisciplinary algorithms for achieving hemostasis in patients with trauma. The American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma recommends that interventional radiologists be available within 30 minutes to perform emergent AE. However, the impact of the timing of AE on patient outcomes is still not well known. We hypothesized that a delay in AE would be associated with increased mortality and higher blood transfusion requirements in patients with blunt intra-abdominal solid organ injury.

METHODS

A 4-year (2013-2016) retrospective review of the ACS Trauma Quality Improvement Program database was performed. We included adult patients (age, ≥18 years) with blunt intra-abdominal solid organ injury who underwent AE within 4 hours of hospital admission. Patients who underwent operative intervention before AE were excluded. The primary outcome was 24-hour mortality. The secondary outcome was blood product transfusions. Patients were grouped into four 1-hour intervals according to their time from admission to AE. Multivariate regression analysis was performed to accommodate patient differences.

RESULTS

We analyzed 1,009,922 trauma patients, of which 924 (1 hour, 76; 1-2 hours, 224; 2-3 hours, 350; 3-4 hours, 274) were deemed eligible. The mean ± SD age was 44 ± 19 years, and 66% were male. The mean ± SD time to AE was 144 ± 54 minutes, and 92% of patients underwent AE more than 1 hour after admission. Overall 24-hour mortality was 5.2%. On univariate analysis, patients receiving earlier AE had decreased 24-hour mortality (p = 0.016), but no decrease in blood products transfused. On regression analysis, every hour delay in AE was significantly associated with increased 24-hour mortality (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Delayed AE for hemorrhagic control in blunt trauma patients with an intra-abdominal solid organ injury is associated with increased 24-hour mortality. Trauma centers should ensure timeliness of interventional radiologist availability to prevent a delay in vital AE, and it should be a focus of quality improvement projects.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic, level III.

摘要

介绍

血管栓塞术(AE)是实现创伤患者止血的多学科算法的一个组成部分。美国外科医师学院创伤委员会建议,介入放射科医生应在 30 分钟内能够进行紧急 AE。然而,AE 的时间对患者预后的影响尚不清楚。我们假设,在钝性腹部实质性器官损伤的患者中,AE 的延迟与死亡率的增加和更高的输血需求有关。

方法

对 ACS 创伤质量改进计划数据库进行了一项为期 4 年(2013-2016 年)的回顾性研究。我们纳入了在入院后 4 小时内接受 AE 的成人(年龄≥18 岁)患者,排除了在 AE 前接受手术干预的患者。主要结局是 24 小时死亡率。次要结局是血液制品的输注。根据患者从入院到接受 AE 的时间,将患者分为四个 1 小时间隔组。采用多变量回归分析来适应患者的差异。

结果

我们分析了 1009922 名创伤患者,其中 924 名(1 小时 76 名;1-2 小时 224 名;2-3 小时 350 名;3-4 小时 274 名)被认为符合条件。平均年龄±标准差为 44±19 岁,66%为男性。AE 的平均±标准差时间为 144±54 分钟,92%的患者在入院后 1 小时以上接受 AE。总体 24 小时死亡率为 5.2%。在单因素分析中,接受早期 AE 的患者 24 小时死亡率降低(p=0.016),但输血量没有减少。回归分析显示,AE 每延迟 1 小时与 24 小时死亡率增加显著相关(p<0.05)。

结论

在有腹部实质性器官损伤的钝性创伤患者中,为控制出血而延迟 AE 与 24 小时死亡率增加有关。创伤中心应确保介入放射科医生的可用性的及时性,以防止重要的 AE 延迟,并应将其作为质量改进项目的重点。

证据水平

预后,III 级。

相似文献

1
Angioembolization in intra-abdominal solid organ injury: Does delay in angioembolization affect outcomes?腹部实质脏器损伤的血管栓塞治疗:血管栓塞治疗的延迟是否会影响结果?
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2020 Oct;89(4):723-729. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000002851.
2
Reevaluation of Hepatic Angioembolization for Trauma in Stable Patients: Weighing the Risk.重新评估稳定型创伤患者肝动脉栓塞术的风险。
J Am Coll Surg. 2020 Jul;231(1):123-131.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2020.05.006. Epub 2020 May 15.
3
Effect of door-to-angioembolization time on mortality in pelvic fracture: Every hour of delay counts.骨盆骨折血管内栓塞治疗时间与死亡率的关系:每延迟一小时都很重要。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2018 May;84(5):685-692. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000001803.
4
Nonoperative treatment of multiple intra-abdominal solid organ injury after blunt abdominal trauma.钝性腹部创伤后腹腔内多个实性器官损伤的非手术治疗
J Trauma. 2008 Apr;64(4):943-8. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3180342023.
5
The use and timing of angioembolization in pediatric blunt liver and spleen injury.小儿钝性肝脾损伤中血管栓塞术的应用及时机
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2024 Jun 1;96(6):915-920. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000004228. Epub 2024 Jan 9.
6
Selective angiographic embolization of blunt splenic traumatic injuries in adults decreases failure rate of nonoperative management.成人钝性脾创伤选择性血管造影栓塞术可降低非手术治疗的失败率。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012 May;72(5):1127-34. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3182569849.
7
Angiographic embolization is safe and effective therapy for blunt abdominal solid organ injury in children.血管造影栓塞术是治疗儿童钝性腹部实性器官损伤的一种安全有效的疗法。
J Trauma. 2010 Mar;68(3):526-31. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181d3e5b7.
8
Age does not affect outcomes of nonoperative management of blunt splenic trauma.年龄并不影响钝性脾外伤非手术治疗的结果。
J Am Coll Surg. 2012 Jun;214(6):958-64. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2012.03.007. Epub 2012 Apr 21.
9
Angioembolization reduces operative intervention for blunt splenic injury.血管栓塞术减少了钝性脾损伤的手术干预。
J Trauma. 2008 Jun;64(6):1472-7. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e318174e8cd.
10
Multiplicity of solid organ injury: influence on management and outcomes after blunt abdominal trauma.实体器官损伤的多样性:对钝性腹部创伤后治疗及预后的影响
J Trauma. 2003 May;54(5):925-9. doi: 10.1097/01.TA.0000066182.67385.86.

引用本文的文献

1
Timely angiography and embolization is effective emergency treatment for severe post-traumatic pelvic fractures.及时进行血管造影和栓塞治疗是严重创伤后骨盆骨折有效的急诊治疗方法。
Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 11;15(1):12530. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-88322-8.
2
Enhancing clinical risk assessment in pediatric blunt abdominal trauma: A novel scoring system using ultrasound and laboratory data.提高小儿钝性腹部创伤的临床风险评估:一种使用超声和实验室数据的新型评分系统。
BMC Emerg Med. 2025 Mar 1;25(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s12873-025-01196-x.
3
Variation in Outcomes Associated With Blunt Splenic Injury Management.
钝性脾损伤处理相关的结局差异
Cureus. 2025 Jan 6;17(1):e76997. doi: 10.7759/cureus.76997. eCollection 2025 Jan.
4
Endovascular management of haemorrhage and vascular lesions in patients with multiple and/or severe injuries: a systematic review and clinical practice guideline update.多发伤和/或重伤患者出血及血管病变的血管内治疗:系统评价与临床实践指南更新
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2025 Jan 16;51(1):22. doi: 10.1007/s00068-024-02719-0.
5
Angioembolization performed by trauma surgeons for trauma patients: is it feasible in Korea? A retrospective study.创伤外科医生对创伤患者进行血管栓塞术:在韩国可行吗?一项回顾性研究。
J Trauma Inj. 2024 Mar;37(1):28-36. doi: 10.20408/jti.2023.0076. Epub 2024 Jan 12.
6
Association of Time to Definitive Hemostasis With Mortality in Patients With Solid Organ Injuries.实体器官损伤患者确定止血时间与死亡率的关联。
Cureus. 2023 Sep 17;15(9):e45401. doi: 10.7759/cureus.45401. eCollection 2023 Sep.
7
The European guideline on management of major bleeding and coagulopathy following trauma: sixth edition.《欧洲创伤后大出血及凝血功能障碍管理指南》第六版
Crit Care. 2023 Mar 1;27(1):80. doi: 10.1186/s13054-023-04327-7.
8
Factors associated with prolonged procedure time of embolization for trauma patients.创伤患者栓塞手术时间延长的相关因素。
Acute Med Surg. 2022 Mar 19;9(1):e743. doi: 10.1002/ams2.743. eCollection 2022 Jan-Dec.
9
Relationship between in-hospital mortality and abdominal angiography among patients with blunt liver injuries: a propensity score-matching from a nationwide trauma registry of Japan.钝性肝损伤患者住院死亡率与腹部血管造影之间的关系:来自日本全国创伤登记处的倾向评分匹配研究
Acute Med Surg. 2022 Jan 13;9(1):e725. doi: 10.1002/ams2.725. eCollection 2022 Jan-Dec.