Boteon Ana Paula, Dallavilla Gabriela Guarda, Cardoso Fabrícia, Wang Linda, Rios Daniela, Honório Heitor M
Department of Restorative Dentistry, Endodontics and Dental Materials, Bauru School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, Bauru, Brazil.
Bauru School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, Bauru, Brazil.
Am J Dent. 2020 Oct;33(5):239-242.
Concurrently with the growing interest in CAD-CAM systems, several new materials of different chemical nature have become available. As an alternative to ceramics, numerous polymer-based materials have recently been proposed for permanent prosthetic restorations. Aim of this study was to test the CAD-CAM polymer-based materials available on the market, comparing mean flexural strength, Weibull characteristic strength and Weibull modulus.
Seven types of polymer-based blocks were tested: Lava Ultimate, 3M; Brilliant Crios, Coltene; Cerasmart, GC; Block HC, Shofu; Katana Avencia, Noritake; Grandio Blocs, Voco; Tetric CAD, and Ivoclar-Vivadent. Specimens were cut out from blocks, finished, polished, and tested in a three-point bending test apparatus until failure (n=30). Flexural strength, Weibull characteristic strength, and Weibull modulus were calculated. Flexural strength data were statistically analyzed. ANOVA on Ranks was applied, followed by the Dunn's test for post hoc comparisons (P= 0.05).
Flexural strength values (MPa) were measured (mean±standard deviation). Different letters in parentheses label statistically significant differences: Grandio Blocs 266±24(a), Brilliant Crios 259±21(ab); Tetric CAD 254±15(ab); Katana Avencia 241±29(bc); Cerasmart 221±24(cd); Lava Ultimate 196±23(de); Block HC 139±10(e). All the tested materials had flexural strengths greater than 100 MPa, thereby satisfying the requirements of ISO standards for polymer-based materials. For all the tested materials the Weibull characteristic strength was greater than 100 MPa. Weibull modulus ranged between 21.20 (Tetric CAD) and 9.09 (Katana Avencia).
Even though all the CAD-CAM polymer-based materials marketed in blocks tested in the present study satisfy the requirements of ISO standard for polymer-based materials, their flexural resistance differs significantly. The data presented in the study may be helpful to clinicians for selecting the most appropriate materials for each clinical case.
随着人们对计算机辅助设计与计算机辅助制造(CAD-CAM)系统的兴趣日益浓厚,几种具有不同化学性质的新型材料已可供使用。作为陶瓷的替代品,最近已提出多种基于聚合物的材料用于永久性修复体。本研究的目的是测试市场上现有的基于CAD-CAM的聚合物材料,比较其平均抗弯强度、威布尔特征强度和威布尔模量。
测试了七种基于聚合物的块体:3M公司的Lava Ultimate、科尔tene公司的Brilliant Crios、GC公司的Cerasmart、松风公司的Block HC、则武公司的Katana Avencia、VOCO公司的Grandio Blocs、义获嘉伟瓦登特公司的Tetric CAD和Ivoclar-Vivadent。从块体上切取试样,进行加工、抛光,并在三点弯曲试验装置中进行测试直至破坏(n = 30)。计算抗弯强度、威布尔特征强度和威布尔模量。对抗弯强度数据进行统计分析。应用秩和检验,随后进行邓恩检验以进行事后比较(P = 0.05)。
测量了抗弯强度值(MPa)(平均值±标准差)。括号内不同字母表示统计学上的显著差异:Grandio Blocs为266±24(a)、Brilliant Crios为259±21(ab);Tetric CAD为254±15(ab);Katana Avencia为241±29(bc);Cerasmart为221±24(cd);Lava Ultimate为196±23(de);Block HC为139±10(e)。所有测试材料的抗弯强度均大于100 MPa,从而满足基于聚合物材料的ISO标准要求。对于所有测试材料,威布尔特征强度均大于100 MPa。威布尔模量在21.20(Tetric CAD)至9.09(Katana Avencia)之间。
尽管本研究中测试的所有以块体形式销售的基于CAD-CAM的聚合物材料均满足基于聚合物材料的ISO标准要求,但其抗弯曲性能存在显著差异。本研究中呈现的数据可能有助于临床医生为每个临床病例选择最合适的材料。