Department of Cardiology, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 300 Longwood Ave, Boston, MA.
Department of Cardiology, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 300 Longwood Ave, Boston, MA.
Am Heart J. 2020 Dec;230:82-92. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2020.09.018. Epub 2020 Oct 2.
Past studies have not detected consistent improvement in ventricular function (VFxn) following initiation of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in Fontan patients. However, these studies used qualitative assessments of VFxn and/or quantitative assessments of VFxn that rely upon anatomic and/or geometric assumptions that may not be valid in patients with single ventricles. To address this, we used quantitative indices of global VFxn (dP/dt and the Tei index) that are not encumbered by the limitations associated with the indices used in previous studies of CRT in Fontan patients.
Patients with Fontan physiology who had received CRT therapy from 2004 to 2019 were included in the study. They were compared to a concurrent group of Fontan patients who had received standard dual-chamber pacemakers (DCPMs).
VFxn was assessed at 3 time points: prior to, shortly after, and late after initiation of pacemaker therapy. Prior to initiation of pacemaker therapy, VFxn of the CRT patients tended to be worse than that of the DCPM patients. For both groups, VFxn appeared to be stable or slightly improved shortly after initiation of pacemaker therapy. In the CRT group, VFxn improved significantly between early and late follow-up. In contrast, VFxn in DCPM patients tended to decline during this period. Changes in VFxn correlated with concurrent changes in New York Heart Association classification.
Quantitative assessments of VFxn using indices not confounded by complex cardiac anatomy, segmental wall motions abnormalities, or inappropriate geometric assumptions revealed that CRT in Fontan patients is associated with preservation or improvement VFxn compared to standard DCPM. Changes in VFxn correlate with concurrent changes in New York Heart Association classification.
既往研究未发现 Fontan 患者启动心脏再同步治疗(CRT)后心室功能(VFxn)持续改善。然而,这些研究使用了 VFxn 的定性评估和/或定量评估,这些评估依赖于解剖和/或几何假设,而这些假设在单心室患者中可能并不成立。为了解决这个问题,我们使用了定量的整体 VFxn 指数(dP/dt 和 Tei 指数),这些指数不受 CRT 在 Fontan 患者中既往研究中使用的指数的局限性的影响。
纳入了 2004 年至 2019 年接受 CRT 治疗的 Fontan 患者。将其与同期接受标准双腔起搏器(DCPM)治疗的 Fontan 患者进行比较。
在 3 个时间点评估了 VFxn:起搏治疗前、起搏治疗后不久和晚期。起搏治疗前,CRT 患者的 VFxn 比 DCPM 患者差。对于两组患者,起搏治疗后不久,VFxn 似乎稳定或略有改善。在 CRT 组,VFxn 在早期和晚期随访之间有显著改善。相比之下,DCPM 患者的 VFxn 在这段时间内呈下降趋势。VFxn 的变化与纽约心脏协会(NYHA)分级的同时变化相关。
使用不受复杂心脏解剖、节段壁运动异常或不适当几何假设影响的 VFxn 定量评估指数发现,与标准 DCPM 相比,CRT 在 Fontan 患者中与 VFxn 的保存或改善相关。VFxn 的变化与 NYHA 分级的同时变化相关。