School of Civil Engineering and Surveying, Faculty of Health, Engineering and Sciences, University of Southern Queensland, West Street, Toowoomba, Queensland, 4350, Australia.
Korea Biochar Research Center & Division of Environmental Science and Ecological Engineering, Korea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Environ Pollut. 2021 Jan 1;268(Pt B):115668. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2020.115668. Epub 2020 Sep 17.
Selective removal of arsenic (As) is the key challenge for any of As removal mechanisms as this not only increases the efficiency of removal of the main As species (neutral As(III) and As(V) hydroxyl-anions) but also allows for a significant reduction of waste as it does not co-remove other solutes. Selective removal has a number of benefits: it increases the capacity and lifetime of units while lowering the cost of the process. Therefore, a sustainable selective mitigation method should be considered concerning the economic resources available, the ability of infrastructure to sustain water treatment, and the options for reuse and/or safe disposal of treatment residuals. Several methods of selective As removal have been developed, such as precipitation, adsorption and modified iron and ligand exchange. The biggest challenge in selective removal of As is the presence of phosphate in water which is chemically comparable with As(V). There are two types of mechanisms involved with As removal: Coulombic or ion exchange; and Lewis acid-base interaction. Solution pH is one of the major controlling factors limiting removal efficiency since most of the above-mentioned methods depend on complexation through electrostatic effects. The different features of two different As species make the selective removal process more difficult, especially under natural conditions. Most of the selective As removal methods involve hydrated Fe(III) oxides through Lewis acid-base interaction. Microbiological methods have been studied recently for selective removal of As, and although there have been only a small number of studies, the method shows remarkable results and indicates positive prospects for the future.
砷(As)的选择性去除是任何 As 去除机制的关键挑战,因为这不仅提高了主要 As 物种(中性 As(III)和 As(V)羟基阴离子)的去除效率,而且还可以显著减少废物的产生,因为它不会与其他溶质一起去除。选择性去除有许多好处:它可以提高单元的容量和寿命,同时降低处理成本。因此,在考虑到可用的经济资源、基础设施维持水处理的能力以及处理残留物的再利用和/或安全处置的选择时,应该考虑采用可持续的选择性缓解方法。已经开发了几种选择性去除 As 的方法,例如沉淀、吸附和改性铁以及配体交换。选择性去除 As 的最大挑战是水中存在磷酸盐,其在化学上与 As(V)相当。去除 As 涉及两种机制:库仑或离子交换;和路易斯酸碱相互作用。溶液 pH 值是限制去除效率的主要控制因素之一,因为上述大多数方法都依赖于通过静电效应进行络合。两种不同 As 物种的不同特性使得选择性去除过程更加困难,特别是在自然条件下。大多数选择性去除 As 的方法都涉及通过路易斯酸碱相互作用的水合三价铁氧化物。最近已经研究了微生物方法用于选择性去除 As,尽管研究数量较少,但该方法显示出显著的结果,并为未来提供了积极的前景。