Kim Aram, Kim Sehwan, Kim Hyeong Gon
Department of Urology, KonKuk University Medical Center, KonKuk University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Department of Biomedical Engineering, Beckman Laser Institute Korea, School of Medicine, Dankook University, Cheoan, Korea.
Int Neurourol J. 2020 Sep;24(3):222-230. doi: 10.5213/inj.2040052.026. Epub 2020 Sep 30.
Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) is a highly prevalent health condition that significantly impacts the quality of life. Traditional methods of treatment for SUI, such as pubovaginal sling and Burch colposuspension, have been replaced by the midurethral sling because of its high efficacy, low complication and morbidity rates, and short learning curve. Although multiple behavioral and operative treatments exist, midurethral slings are the gold standard for the treatment of SUI in women. However, several reports have raised concerns about complications caused by the synthetic mesh used in midurethral slings. Therefore, surgical treatment for SUI in women must be chosen with care, taking into account potential complications. Herein, we review the current safety issues pertaining to the use of meshes, the efficacy of traditional surgeries, old and new midurethral slings, and recent data comparing the efficacy and safety of different surgical options. This review is aimed at developing practical guidelines for choosing surgical options for women with SUI.
压力性尿失禁(SUI)是一种高度普遍的健康状况,会对生活质量产生重大影响。由于耻骨后尿道吊带术疗效高、并发症和发病率低且学习曲线短,SUI的传统治疗方法,如耻骨阴道吊带术和Burch阴道悬吊术,已被耻骨后尿道吊带术所取代。尽管存在多种行为和手术治疗方法,但耻骨后尿道吊带术是治疗女性SUI的金标准。然而,有几份报告对耻骨后尿道吊带术中使用的合成网片引起的并发症表示担忧。因此,女性SUI的手术治疗必须谨慎选择,要考虑到潜在的并发症。在此,我们回顾了与网片使用相关的当前安全问题、传统手术的疗效、新旧耻骨后尿道吊带术,以及最近比较不同手术选择的疗效和安全性的数据。本综述旨在为选择SUI女性的手术方案制定实用指南。