Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR.
Oregon Department of Forestry, Salem, OR.
Phytopathology. 2021 Apr;111(4):731-740. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO-05-20-0164-R. Epub 2021 Mar 9.
Sudden oak death caused by has been actively managed in Oregon since the early 2000s. To date, this epidemic has been driven mostly by the NA1 clonal lineage of , but an outbreak of the EU1 lineage has recently emerged. Here, we contrast the population dynamics of the NA1 outbreak first reported in 2001 to the outbreak of the EU1 lineage first detected in 2015. We performed tests to determine whether any of the lineages were introduced more than once. Infested regions of the forest were sampled between 2013 and 2018 ( = 903), and strains were genotyped at 15 microsatellite loci. Most genotypes observed were transient, with 272 of 358 unique genotypes emerging during one year and disappearing the next year. The diversity of EU1 was very low and isolates were spatially clustered (less than 8 km apart), suggesting a single EU1 introduction. Some forest isolates are genetically similar to isolates collected from a local nursery in 2012, suggesting the introduction of EU1 from this nursery or simultaneous introduction to both the nursery and latently into the forest. In contrast, the older NA1 populations were more polymorphic and spread more than 30 km. A principal component analysis supported two to four independent NA1 introductions. The NA1 and EU1 epidemics infest the same area but show disparate demographics because of the initial introductions of the lineages spaced 10 years apart. Comparing these epidemics provides novel insight regarding patterns of emergence of clonal pathogens in forest ecosystems.
自 21 世纪初以来,在俄勒冈州积极管理由 引起的突发橡树死亡。迄今为止,这种流行病主要是由 NA1 无性系引起的,但最近爆发了 EU1 谱系。在这里,我们将首次报道的 2001 年 NA1 暴发的种群动态与 2015 年首次检测到的 EU1 谱系暴发进行了对比。我们进行了测试,以确定任何谱系是否不止一次引入。2013 年至 2018 年(= 903)对森林受感染地区进行了采样,并在 15 个微卫星基因座对菌株进行了基因分型。观察到的大多数基因型都是短暂的,在一年内出现了 358 个独特基因型中的 272 个,第二年就消失了。EU1 的多样性非常低,并且分离株在空间上聚集(相隔不到 8 公里),表明只有一个 EU1 引入。一些森林分离株与 2012 年从当地苗圃收集的分离株在遗传上相似,这表明 EU1 是从该苗圃或同时引入苗圃和潜伏期引入的。相比之下,较旧的 NA1 种群具有更高的多态性,并且传播超过 30 公里。主成分分析支持两个到四个独立的 NA1 引入。NA1 和 EU1 流行病侵袭同一地区,但由于谱系的初始引入相隔 10 年,因此表现出不同的人口统计学特征。比较这些流行病提供了关于无性病原体在森林生态系统中出现模式的新见解。