• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

结肠癌手术后血液微生物群的变化。

Alterations in blood microbiota after colonic cancer surgery.

作者信息

Søby J H, Watt S K, Vogelsang R P, Servant F, Lelouvier B, Raskov H, Knop F K, Gögenur I

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Centre for Surgical Science, Zealand University Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Køge, Denmark.

The Danish Cancer Society, Copenhagen, Denmark.

出版信息

BJS Open. 2020 Oct 6;4(6):1227-37. doi: 10.1002/bjs5.50357.

DOI:10.1002/bjs5.50357
PMID:33022149
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7709364/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Mechanisms contributing to the perioperative stress response remain poorly understood. This study investigated changes in the amount of bacterial DNA in blood and the diversity of blood microbiota in the perioperative period in patients undergoing minimally invasive surgery for colonic cancer in an enhanced recovery after surgery setting.

METHODS

DNA encoding the bacterial 16S ribosomal RNA gene (16S rDNA) in whole blood obtained the day before surgery, and on postoperative day (POD) 1 and POD 10-14 was amplified and quantified by PCR before sequencing for taxonomic assignment. Richness, evenness and similarity measures were calculated to compare microbiota between days. Differences in relative abundance were analysed using the linear discriminant analysis effect size (LEfSe) algorithm.

RESULTS

Thirty patients were included between January and July 2016. The concentration of bacterial 16S rDNA in blood increased between the day before surgery and POD 1 (P = 0.025). Bacterial richness was lower on POD 10-14 than on the day before surgery and POD 1 (both P < 0·001). LEfSe analysis comparing the day before surgery and POD 10-14 identified changes in the abundance of several bacteria, including Fusobacterium nucleatum, which was relatively enriched on POD 10-14.

CONCLUSION

These findings suggest that the blood of patients with colonic cancer harbours bacterial 16S rDNA, which increases in concentration after surgery.

摘要

背景

围手术期应激反应的机制仍未得到充分理解。本研究调查了在术后加速康复环境下接受结肠癌微创手术的患者围手术期血液中细菌DNA数量的变化以及血液微生物群的多样性。

方法

对手术前一天、术后第1天以及术后第10 - 14天采集的全血中编码细菌16S核糖体RNA基因(16S rDNA)的DNA进行PCR扩增和定量,然后进行测序以进行分类鉴定。计算丰富度、均匀度和相似度指标以比较不同时间点的微生物群。使用线性判别分析效应大小(LEfSe)算法分析相对丰度的差异。

结果

2016年1月至7月纳入了30例患者。血液中细菌16S rDNA的浓度在手术前一天至术后第1天之间有所增加(P = 0.025)。术后第10 - 14天的细菌丰富度低于手术前一天和术后第1天(P均<0.001)。比较手术前一天和术后第10 - 14天的LEfSe分析确定了几种细菌丰度的变化,包括具核梭杆菌,其在术后第10 - 14天相对富集。

结论

这些发现表明结肠癌患者的血液中含有细菌16S rDNA,其浓度在手术后会增加。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/74c4/7709364/ed4bb8da2b2d/BJS5-4-1227-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/74c4/7709364/5e7e6df1ee33/BJS5-4-1227-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/74c4/7709364/aa58c57666ae/BJS5-4-1227-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/74c4/7709364/32b664651c63/BJS5-4-1227-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/74c4/7709364/ed4bb8da2b2d/BJS5-4-1227-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/74c4/7709364/5e7e6df1ee33/BJS5-4-1227-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/74c4/7709364/aa58c57666ae/BJS5-4-1227-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/74c4/7709364/32b664651c63/BJS5-4-1227-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/74c4/7709364/ed4bb8da2b2d/BJS5-4-1227-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Alterations in blood microbiota after colonic cancer surgery.结肠癌手术后血液微生物群的变化。
BJS Open. 2020 Oct 6;4(6):1227-37. doi: 10.1002/bjs5.50357.
2
Deciphering intra-species bacterial diversity of meat and seafood spoilage microbiota using gyrB amplicon sequencing: A comparative analysis with 16S rDNA V3-V4 amplicon sequencing.利用 gyrB 扩增子测序破译肉类和海鲜腐败微生物群的种内细菌多样性:与 16S rDNA V3-V4 扩增子测序的比较分析。
PLoS One. 2018 Sep 25;13(9):e0204629. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0204629. eCollection 2018.
3
Mechanical Bowel Preparation Is a Risk Factor for Postoperative Delirium as It Alters the Gut Microbiota Composition: A Prospective Randomized Single-Center Study.机械性肠道准备是术后谵妄的一个危险因素,因为它会改变肠道微生物群组成:一项前瞻性随机单中心研究。
Front Aging Neurosci. 2022 Apr 4;14:847610. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2022.847610. eCollection 2022.
4
Diet-induced changes in fecal microbiota composition and diversity in dogs (Canis lupus familiaris): A comparative study of BARF-type and commercial diets.饮食诱导的犬(家犬)粪便微生物群组成和多样性变化:生食喂养(BARF)型饮食与商业饮食的比较研究
Comp Immunol Microbiol Infect Dis. 2023 Jul;98:102007. doi: 10.1016/j.cimid.2023.102007. Epub 2023 Jun 15.
5
Characterization of Mucosa-Associated Microbiota in Matched Cancer and Non-neoplastic Mucosa From Patients With Colorectal Cancer.结直肠癌患者配对的癌组织与非肿瘤性黏膜中黏膜相关微生物群的特征分析
Front Microbiol. 2019 Jun 12;10:1317. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.01317. eCollection 2019.
6
[Analysis of the changes in intestinal microecology in the early stage of sepsis rat based on 16S rDNA sequencing].基于16S rDNA测序的脓毒症大鼠早期肠道微生态变化分析
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2022 Jan;34(1):28-34. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20201215-00754.
7
Comparison of genomic and transcriptional microbiome analysis in gastric cancer patients and healthy individuals.胃癌患者与健康个体的基因组和转录组微生物组分析比较。
World J Gastroenterol. 2023 Feb 21;29(7):1202-1218. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v29.i7.1202.
8
Comparative analysis of shotgun metagenomics and 16S rDNA sequencing of gut microbiota in migratory seagulls.迁徙海鸥肠道微生物组的鸟枪法宏基因组学和 16S rDNA 测序的比较分析。
PeerJ. 2023 Nov 3;11:e16394. doi: 10.7717/peerj.16394. eCollection 2023.
9
[Analysis of the dynamic changes in gut microbiota in patients with extremely severe burns by 16S ribosomal RNA high-throughput sequencing technology].[16S核糖体RNA高通量测序技术分析特重度烧伤患者肠道微生物群的动态变化]
Zhonghua Shao Shang Za Zhi. 2020 Dec 20;36(12):1159-1166. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501120-20200518-00271.
10
Impact of DNA extraction and sampling methods on bacterial communities monitored by 16S rDNA metabarcoding in cold-smoked salmon and processing plant surfaces.DNA提取和采样方法对冷熏三文鱼及加工厂表面通过16S rDNA宏条形码监测的细菌群落的影响。
Food Microbiol. 2021 May;95:103705. doi: 10.1016/j.fm.2020.103705. Epub 2020 Dec 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Blood microbiome signatures in systemic diseases: current insights, methodological pitfalls, and future horizons.全身性疾病中的血液微生物组特征:当前见解、方法学陷阱及未来展望
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2025 Jul 28;15:1616029. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2025.1616029. eCollection 2025.
2
Occult bacteremia in living donor liver transplantation: a prospective observational study of recipients and donors.活体肝移植中隐匿性菌血症:一项对受者和供者的前瞻性观察研究。
Surg Today. 2024 Jun;54(6):596-605. doi: 10.1007/s00595-023-02778-7. Epub 2023 Dec 10.
3
Circulating Microbial Cell-Free DNA in Health and Disease.

本文引用的文献

1
Increased oxidative stress with substantial dysregulation of genes related to oxidative stress and DNA repair after laparoscopic colon cancer surgery.腹腔镜结肠癌手术后氧化应激增加,与氧化应激和 DNA 修复相关的基因明显失调。
Surg Oncol. 2020 Dec;35:71-78. doi: 10.1016/j.suronc.2020.06.009. Epub 2020 Aug 1.
2
Type 2 diabetes influences bacterial tissue compartmentalisation in human obesity.2 型糖尿病影响人类肥胖中的细菌组织区隔化。
Nat Metab. 2020 Mar;2(3):233-242. doi: 10.1038/s42255-020-0178-9. Epub 2020 Mar 9.
3
Associations between blood cultures after surgery for colorectal cancer and long-term oncological outcomes.
循环游离微生物 DNA 在健康与疾病中的作用。
Int J Mol Sci. 2023 Feb 3;24(3):3051. doi: 10.3390/ijms24033051.
4
Human Blood Bacteriome: Eubiotic and Dysbiotic States in Health and Diseases.人类血液细菌组:健康与疾病中的共生和失调状态。
Cells. 2022 Jun 23;11(13):2015. doi: 10.3390/cells11132015.
5
Prognostic significance of the microbiome-adipose tissue axis in rectal cancer: protocol of a prospective observational study.微生物群-脂肪组织轴在直肠癌中的预后意义:一项前瞻性观察性研究方案
BJS Open. 2022 Mar 8;6(2). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrac009.
结直肠癌手术后血培养与长期肿瘤学结局的关系。
Br J Surg. 2020 Feb;107(3):310-315. doi: 10.1002/bjs.11372. Epub 2019 Nov 22.
4
Trust is good, control is better: technical considerations in blood microbiome analysis.信任固然好,控制更重要:血液微生物组分析中的技术考量
Gut. 2020 Jul;69(7):1362-1363. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2019-319123. Epub 2019 Jun 15.
5
Orthostatic intolerance in enhanced recovery laparoscopic colorectal resection.腹腔镜结直肠切除术后增强康复中直立不耐受。
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2019 Feb;63(2):171-177. doi: 10.1111/aas.13238. Epub 2018 Aug 10.
6
Recurrence Risk After Up-to-Date Colon Cancer Staging, Surgery, and Pathology: Analysis of the Entire Swedish Population.更新后的结肠癌分期、手术和病理学后复发风险:对整个瑞典人群的分析。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2018 Sep;61(9):1016-1025. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000001158.
7
Whole Blood Gene Expression Profiling in patients undergoing colon cancer surgery identifies differential expression of genes involved in immune surveillance, inflammation and carcinogenesis.接受结肠癌手术患者的全血基因表达谱分析确定了参与免疫监视、炎症和致癌作用的基因的差异表达。
Surg Oncol. 2018 Jun;27(2):208-215. doi: 10.1016/j.suronc.2018.03.002. Epub 2018 Mar 27.
8
Perioperative events influence cancer recurrence risk after surgery.围手术期事件影响手术后癌症复发的风险。
Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2018 Apr;15(4):205-218. doi: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2017.194. Epub 2017 Dec 28.
9
FROGS: Find, Rapidly, OTUs with Galaxy Solution.FROGS:使用 Galaxy 解决方案快速找到 OTUs。
Bioinformatics. 2018 Apr 15;34(8):1287-1294. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btx791.
10
Surgery-induced tumor growth in (metastatic) colorectal cancer.手术诱导(转移性)结直肠癌中的肿瘤生长。
Surg Oncol. 2017 Dec;26(4):535-543. doi: 10.1016/j.suronc.2017.10.004. Epub 2017 Oct 17.