Suppr超能文献

视频会议疼痛管理方案:快速综述。

Pain management programmes via video conferencing: a rapid review.

机构信息

University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.

Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

出版信息

Scand J Pain. 2020 Oct 7;21(1):32-40. doi: 10.1515/sjpain-2020-0112. Print 2021 Jan 27.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

During the current COVID-19 pandemic, healthcare has been transformed by the rapid switch from in person care to use of remote consulting, including video conferencing technology. Whilst much has been published on video consultations, little literature exists on use of this technology to facilitate group interventions. Group pain management programmes are a core treatment provided by many pain services. This rapid review aimed to identify the extent of use of video conferencing technology for delivery of group pain management programmes and provide an overview of its use.

METHODS

A rapid review of the literature published up to April 2020 (PubMed, PsycINFO and PEDro) was performed. The search string consisted of three domains: pain/CP (MeSH term) AND Peer group[MeSH] AND Videoconferencing[MeSH]/Telemedicine[MeSH]/Remote Consultation[MeSH]. The studies were of poor methodological quality and study design, and interventions and chronic pain conditions were varied.

RESULTS

Literature searching yielded three eligible papers for this review. All studies had low methodological quality and risk of bias. Heterogeneity and variability in outcome reporting did not allow any pooling of data. The results demonstrated that videoconferencing for delivery of group programmes is possible, yet there is little extant literature on how to develop, deliver and measure outcomes of such programmes.

CONCLUSIONS

This review demonstrates that there is little evidence to support or guide the use of synchronous videoconferencing to deliver pain management programmes. We present issues to consider, informed by this review and our experience, when implementing video conferencing. Study quality of existing work is variable, and extensive future research is necessary.

摘要

目的

在当前的 COVID-19 大流行期间,医疗保健已经迅速从面对面护理转变为远程咨询,包括视频会议技术。虽然已经发表了很多关于视频咨询的文章,但关于使用该技术来促进小组干预的文献很少。小组疼痛管理计划是许多疼痛服务提供的核心治疗方法。本快速综述旨在确定使用视频会议技术提供小组疼痛管理计划的程度,并概述其使用情况。

方法

对截至 2020 年 4 月发表的文献进行了快速综述(PubMed、PsycINFO 和 PEDro)。搜索字符串由三个领域组成:疼痛/CP(MeSH 术语)和同伴小组[MeSH]和视频会议[MeSH]/远程医疗[MeSH]/远程咨询[MeSH]。这些研究的方法学质量和研究设计较差,干预措施和慢性疼痛状况也各不相同。

结果

文献搜索产生了这篇综述的三篇合格论文。所有研究的方法学质量和偏倚风险都较低。由于结果报告的异质性和可变性,无法进行任何数据汇总。结果表明,通过视频会议提供小组方案是可行的,但关于如何开发、提供和衡量此类方案的结果,文献很少。

结论

本综述表明,几乎没有证据支持或指导使用同步视频会议来提供疼痛管理计划。我们根据本综述和我们的经验提出了一些问题,供在实施视频会议时考虑。现有工作的研究质量各不相同,需要进行广泛的未来研究。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验