Senior Partner, Nephrology Associates of Northern Virginia , VA, Fairfax, Virginia, USA.
Nephrology Division Chief, Inova Fairfax Hospital, Department of Medicine, Falls Church , Virginia, VA, USA.
Expert Rev Hematol. 2020 Nov;13(11):1175-1188. doi: 10.1080/17474086.2020.1830371. Epub 2020 Nov 2.
Anemia has and will continue to be a central theme in medicine particularly as clinicians are treating a burgeoning population of complex multi-organ system processes. As a result of multiple randomized controlled trials (RCTs), meta-analyses, and societal recommendations overly restrictive paradigms and under-administration of erythropoiesis stimulating agents (ESAs) have likely been followed by clinicians among all specialties.
A review of anemia in the context of chronic kidney disease, hematologic malignancies, and cancer is presented with focus on the establishment of ESAs as integral in the treatment of anemia. Multiple RCTs and meta-analyses studying the use of ESAs are presented with focus upon their application to clinical practice. A 'compendium' is proffered describing the evolution, establishment, and implications of ESA administration initially among those with CKD with rapid subsequent application to the Hematology-Oncology population of patients. Literature search methodologies have included MEDLINE (1985-2020), PubMed (1996-2020), Cochrane Central Trials (1985-2020), EMBASE (2000-2020), and ClinicalTrials.gov (2000-2020).
Upon evaluation of risks and benefits of ESAs focused opinion and commentary is made supporting more liberal use of these agents and strongly suggesting that the current underlying treatment 'pendulum' has perhaps shifted too far to the 'under-treatment' side in many cases.
贫血一直是医学的一个核心主题,尤其是在临床医生治疗日益复杂的多器官系统疾病时。由于多项随机对照试验(RCT)、荟萃分析和社会建议,过度限制的范式和促红细胞生成素刺激剂(ESA)的使用不足,可能已经被所有专业的临床医生所遵循。
本文回顾了慢性肾脏病、血液恶性肿瘤和癌症中的贫血,并重点介绍了 ESA 在贫血治疗中的重要作用。本文还介绍了多项研究 ESA 使用的 RCT 和荟萃分析,重点关注其在临床实践中的应用。本文还提供了一份“纲要”,描述了 ESA 给药的演变、确立及其影响,最初是在 CKD 患者中,随后迅速应用于血液肿瘤患者。文献检索方法包括 MEDLINE(1985-2020)、PubMed(1996-2020)、Cochrane 中心试验(1985-2020)、EMBASE(2000-2020)和 ClinicalTrials.gov(2000-2020)。
在评估 ESA 的风险和收益后,本文提出了集中的意见和评论,支持更自由地使用这些药物,并强烈建议在许多情况下,目前的基本治疗“钟摆”可能已经向“治疗不足”的方向摆动得太远了。