RAND Corporation, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
RAND Corporation, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2020 Oct 8;29:e172. doi: 10.1017/S2045796020000840.
To test the impact of using different idioms in epidemiological interviews on the prevalence and correlates of poor mental health and mental health service use.
We conducted a randomised methodological experiment in a nationally representative sample of the US adult population, comparing a lay idiom, which asked about 'problems with your emotions or nerves' with a more medical idiom, which asked about 'problems with your mental health'. Differences across study arms in the associations of endorsement of problems with the Kessler-6 (a validated assessment of psychological distress), demographic characteristics, self-rated health and mental health service use were examined.
Respondents were about half as likely to endorse a problem when asked with the more medical idiom (18.1%) than when asked with the lay idiom (35.1%). The medical idiom had a significantly larger area under the ROC curve when compared against a validated measure of psychological distress than the lay idiom (0.91 v. 0.87, p = 0.012). The proportion of the population who endorsed a problem but did not receive treatment in the past year was less than half as large for the medical idiom (7.90%) than for the lay idiom (20.94%). Endorsement of problems differed in its associations with age, sex, race/ethnicity and self-rated health depending on the question idiom. For instance, the odds of endorsing problems were threefold higher in the youngest than the oldest age group when the medical idiom was used (OR = 3.07; 95% CI 1.47-6.41) but did not differ across age groups when the lay idiom was used (OR = 0.76; 95% CI 0.43-1.36).
Choice of idiom in epidemiological questionnaires can affect the apparent correlates of poor mental health and service use. Cultural change within populations over time may require changes in instrument wording to maintain consistency in epidemiological measurement of psychiatric conditions.
测试在流行病学访谈中使用不同习语对心理健康不良和精神卫生服务利用的患病率和相关因素的影响。
我们在美国成年人群体中进行了一项具有代表性的随机方法实验,比较了一种通俗习语,即询问“情绪或神经问题”,和一种更医学化的习语,即询问“心理健康问题”。比较了两种研究方法在问题与 Kessler-6(一种经过验证的心理困扰评估)、人口统计学特征、自我评估健康和精神卫生服务利用的关联方面的差异。
当使用更医学的习语时,受访者表示存在问题的可能性大约是使用通俗习语时的一半(18.1%比 35.1%)。与经过验证的心理困扰测量相比,医学习语的 ROC 曲线下面积显著更大(0.91 比 0.87,p=0.012)。在过去一年中,使用医学习语的人群中表示存在问题但未接受治疗的比例小于使用通俗习语的人群(7.90%比 20.94%)。根据问题习语的不同,问题的表示方式在与年龄、性别、种族/民族和自我评估健康的关联上存在差异。例如,当使用医学习语时,最年轻的年龄组比最年长的年龄组表示存在问题的可能性高三倍(OR=3.07;95%CI 1.47-6.41),但当使用通俗习语时,年龄组之间没有差异(OR=0.76;95%CI 0.43-1.36)。
在流行病学问卷中选择习语会影响心理健康不良和服务利用的明显相关因素。随着时间的推移,人群中的文化变化可能需要改变仪器措辞,以保持对精神疾病进行流行病学测量的一致性。