Kohrt Brandon A, Rasmussen Andrew, Kaiser Bonnie N, Haroz Emily E, Maharjan Sujen M, Mutamba Byamah B, de Jong Joop T V M, Hinton Devon E
Duke Global Health Institute, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Durham, NC, USA, Department of Psychology, Fordham University, New York, USA, Department of Anthropology, Department of Epidemiology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA, Department of Mental Health, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA, Department of Psychology, Tribhuvan University, Kirtipur, Nepal, Butabika National Referral Mental and Teaching Hospital, Kampala, Uganda, AISSR, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands and Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Int J Epidemiol. 2014 Apr;43(2):365-406. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyt227. Epub 2013 Dec 23.
Burgeoning global mental health endeavors have renewed debates about cultural applicability of psychiatric categories. This study's goal is to review strengths and limitations of literature comparing psychiatric categories with cultural concepts of distress (CCD) such as cultural syndromes, culture-bound syndromes, and idioms of distress.
The Systematic Assessment of Quality in Observational Research (SAQOR) was adapted based on cultural psychiatry principles to develop a Cultural Psychiatry Epidemiology version (SAQOR-CPE), which was used to rate quality of quantitative studies comparing CCD and psychiatric categories. A meta-analysis was performed for each psychiatric category.
Forty-five studies met inclusion criteria, with 18 782 unique participants. Primary objectives of the studies included comparing CCD and psychiatric disorders (51%), assessing risk factors for CCD (18%) and instrument validation (16%). Only 27% of studies met SAQOR-CPE criteria for medium quality, with the remainder low or very low quality. Only 29% of studies employed representative samples, 53% used validated outcome measures, 44% included function assessments and 44% controlled for confounding. Meta-analyses for anxiety, depression, PTSD and somatization revealed high heterogeneity (I(2) > 75%). Only general psychological distress had low heterogeneity (I(2) = 8%) with a summary effect odds ratio of 5.39 (95% CI 4.71-6.17). Associations between CCD and psychiatric disorders were influenced by methodological issues, such as validation designs (β = 16.27, 95%CI 12.75-19.79) and use of CCD multi-item checklists (β = 6.10, 95%CI 1.89-10.31). Higher quality studies demonstrated weaker associations of CCD and psychiatric disorders.
Cultural concepts of distress are not inherently unamenable to epidemiological study. However, poor study quality impedes conceptual advancement and service application. With improved study design and reporting using guidelines such as the SAQOR-CPE, CCD research can enhance detection of mental health problems, reduce cultural biases in diagnostic criteria and increase cultural salience of intervention trial outcomes.
全球心理健康事业的蓬勃发展引发了关于精神科类别文化适用性的新一轮辩论。本研究的目的是回顾比较精神科类别与痛苦文化概念(CCD)(如文化综合征、文化相关综合征和痛苦习语)的文献的优势和局限性。
基于文化精神病学原则对观察性研究质量的系统评估(SAQOR)进行改编,以开发文化精神病学流行病学版本(SAQOR-CPE),用于对比较CCD和精神科类别的定量研究的质量进行评分。对每个精神科类别进行荟萃分析。
45项研究符合纳入标准,共有18782名独特参与者。研究的主要目标包括比较CCD和精神障碍(51%)、评估CCD的风险因素(18%)和工具验证(16%)。只有27%的研究符合SAQOR-CPE中等质量标准,其余为低质量或极低质量。只有29%的研究采用了代表性样本,53%使用了经过验证的结局测量方法,44%纳入了功能评估,44%控制了混杂因素。对焦虑、抑郁、创伤后应激障碍和躯体化的荟萃分析显示出高度异质性(I²>75%)。只有一般心理痛苦的异质性较低(I²=8%),汇总效应比值比为5.39(95%CI 4.71-6.17)。CCD与精神障碍之间的关联受到方法学问题的影响,如验证设计(β=16.27,95%CI 12.75-19.79)和使用CCD多项目清单(β=6.10,95%CI 1.89-10.31)。高质量研究表明CCD与精神障碍之间的关联较弱。
痛苦文化概念并非本质上不适用于流行病学研究。然而,研究质量差阻碍了概念的进步和服务应用。通过使用SAQOR-CPE等指南改进研究设计和报告,CCD研究可以提高心理健康问题的检测率,减少诊断标准中的文化偏见,并提高干预试验结果的文化显著性。