Odeh Marwan, Karwani Rawan, Schnaider Oleg, Wolf Maya, Bornstein Jacob
Galilee Medical Center, Nahariya, Israel.
Azrieli Faculty of Medicine, Bar Ilan University, Safed, Israel.
Ginekol Pol. 2020;91(9):539-543. doi: 10.5603/GP.2020.0086.
We wanted to identify risk factors for dehiscence of cesarean section (CS) scars in patients undergoing repeated cesarean section.
This was a retrospective case-control study over a 3-year period in our medical center (2011-2014), comparing women who had repeated CS without complications and women diagnosed with dehiscence. Data were collected from medical records and the groups were compared for demographic and obstetrical data.
Dehiscence was identified in 27 women, while 54 women without dehiscence were the control group. Statistically significant differences were found in the need for augmentation, the number of previous cesarean sections, cesarean section in the active phase of labor and length of hospitalization.
The need for augmentation of labor, CS in the nonactive stage and more than one cesarean section, all increased the risk of dehiscence. There was no association between dehiscence and scar pain, time elapsed since the previous cesarean section, the method of wound closure or fever.
我们想要确定接受再次剖宫产的患者剖宫产(CS)疤痕裂开的风险因素。
这是一项在我们医疗中心进行的为期3年(2011 - 2014年)的回顾性病例对照研究,比较了再次剖宫产无并发症的女性和被诊断为疤痕裂开的女性。数据从医疗记录中收集,并对两组的人口统计学和产科数据进行比较。
27名女性被诊断为疤痕裂开,54名无疤痕裂开的女性作为对照组。在引产需求、既往剖宫产次数、产程活跃期剖宫产以及住院时间方面发现了统计学上的显著差异。
引产需求、非活跃期剖宫产以及不止一次剖宫产,均增加了疤痕裂开的风险。疤痕裂开与疤痕疼痛、上次剖宫产术后经过的时间、伤口缝合方法或发热之间没有关联。