Suppr超能文献

沙库巴曲缬沙坦在住院与门诊启动治疗时的安全性和耐受性:一项回顾性真实世界研究

Safety and Tolerability of Sacubitril/Valsartan Initiation in Inpatient Versus Outpatient Setting: A Retrospective Real World Study.

作者信息

Chng Bee Ling Kelly, Hon Jin Shing, Chan Hong, Zheng Yiliang, Gao Fei, Teo Loon Yee Louis, Sim Kheng Leng David

机构信息

Department of Pharmacy, National Heart Centre Singapore, Singapore.

Department of Pharmacy, National Heart Centre Singapore, Singapore.

出版信息

Heart Lung Circ. 2021 May;30(5):674-682. doi: 10.1016/j.hlc.2020.08.014. Epub 2020 Oct 5.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Comparison of Pre- and Post-discharge Initiation of LCZ696 Therapy in HFrEF Patients After an Acute Decompensation Event (TRANSITION) and PIONEER-HF trials have shown that sacubitril/valsartan can be initiated early and safely in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) shortly after an acute heart failure episode during hospitalisation. However, it is unclear whether the results can be translated to Asian populations. Hence, this real-world study was designed with the aim of comparing the safety and tolerability of sacubitril/valsartan initiation in an inpatient versus outpatient setting.

METHODS

A retrospective review for all patients initiated with sacubitril/valsartan from 1 November 2015 to 30 September 2018 was conducted in a tertiary health care institution in Singapore. Patients with HFrEF and aged ≥21 years were included. Incidence of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) and discontinuation rate of sacubitril/valsartan were compared between initiation of sacubitril/valsartan in inpatient and outpatient settings. Reasons for discontinuation were investigated. Subgroup analysis was performed. Cox regression was used to analyse the primary outcomes.

RESULTS

Of the 1,022 patients who were screened, 840 (289 inpatient group; 551 outpatient group) were included. The inpatient group experienced significantly higher ADRs (34.6% vs 22.7%; adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 2.28; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.68-3.10; p<0.01) and discontinuation rate (18.0% vs 10.3%; adjusted HR, 2.11; 95% CI, 1.37-3.26; p<0.01) than the outpatient group. The safety outcomes were consistent across all the subgroups.

CONCLUSIONS

Initiation of sacubitril/valsartan in an inpatient group was associated with higher ADRs and discontinuation rate as compared with an outpatient group in an Asian population. However, given that the majority of patients in the inpatient cohort could tolerate sacubitril/valsartan, it would still be feasible to initiate this drug with close monitoring. Further randomised clinical trials in Asian populations are required to confirm this finding.

摘要

背景

急性失代偿事件后射血分数降低的心力衰竭(HFrEF)患者中LCZ696治疗出院前和出院后启动治疗的比较(TRANSITION)及先锋-HF试验表明,在住院期间急性心力衰竭发作后不久,沙库巴曲缬沙坦可在射血分数降低的心力衰竭(HFrEF)患者中早期且安全地启动。然而,尚不清楚这些结果是否能推广至亚洲人群。因此,本项真实世界研究旨在比较住院与门诊环境中启动沙库巴曲缬沙坦治疗的安全性和耐受性。

方法

对2015年11月1日至2018年9月30日在新加坡一家三级医疗机构中所有启动沙库巴曲缬沙坦治疗的患者进行回顾性分析。纳入年龄≥21岁的HFrEF患者。比较住院和门诊环境中启动沙库巴曲缬沙坦治疗的药物不良反应(ADR)发生率和沙库巴曲缬沙坦停药率。调查停药原因。进行亚组分析。采用Cox回归分析主要结局。

结果

在1022例筛查患者中,840例(住院组289例;门诊组551例)被纳入。住院组的ADR发生率(34.6%对22.7%;调整后风险比[HR],2.28;95%置信区间[CI],1.68 - 3.10;p<0.01)和停药率(18.0%对10.3%;调整后HR,2.11;95%CI,1.37 - 3.26;p<0.01)均显著高于门诊组。所有亚组的安全性结局均一致。

结论

与亚洲人群中的门诊组相比,住院组启动沙库巴曲缬沙坦治疗的ADR和停药率更高。然而,鉴于住院队列中的大多数患者能够耐受沙库巴曲缬沙坦,在密切监测下启动该药物治疗仍可行。需要在亚洲人群中开展进一步的随机临床试验来证实这一发现。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验