Widder B, Friedrich J M, Paulat K, Hamann H, Hutschenreiter S, Kreutzer C, Ott F, Arlart I P
Ultraschall Med. 1987 Apr;8(2):82-6. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1011667.
The specimens from 116 consecutive carotid thrombendarterectomies were taken as "gold standard" to evaluate the accuracy of ultrasound methods (duplex scanning + extra-/transcranial Doppler sonography) and intravenous digital subtraction angiography (i.v. DSA) in carotid artery stenoses. In 65 cases, in which the specimens could be gauged reliably, sonography estimated the degree of stenosis in 85% within a range of +/- 10%, in 97% within +/- 20% i.v. DSA was accurate in 52 respectively in 94%. High-grade stenoses were correctly assessed by ultrasound in 90%, by i.v. DSA in 64%. Sonography identified 4/10 kinkings and coilings of the carotid artery, i.v. DSA 9/10. Current available ultrasound methods enable estimation of the diameter reduction of carotid artery stenoses with low deviations. I.v. DSA seems to be less reliable, but can be used favourably as a complementary method to sonography.
将116例连续颈动脉血栓内膜切除术的标本作为“金标准”,以评估超声方法(双功扫描 + 经颅/经颅多普勒超声)和静脉数字减影血管造影(i.v. DSA)在颈动脉狭窄诊断中的准确性。在65例标本可可靠测量的病例中,超声检查在85%的病例中将狭窄程度估计在±10%的范围内,在97%的病例中估计在±20%的范围内;i.v. DSA在52%的病例中准确,在94%的病例中准确。超声检查对高度狭窄的正确评估率为90%,i.v. DSA为64%。超声检查识别出4/10例颈动脉扭曲和盘绕,i.v. DSA识别出9/10例。目前可用的超声方法能够以低偏差估计颈动脉狭窄的直径减小。i.v. DSA似乎可靠性较低,但可作为超声检查的补充方法加以良好应用。