Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Urol Oncol. 2020 Dec;38(12):938.e1-938.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2020.09.024. Epub 2020 Oct 6.
To evaluate the clinical trifecta of percutaneous cryoablation (PCA) vs. laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) for cT1 renal tumors.
We retrospectively analyzed the records of patients who had undergone 2 types of nephron sparing surgeries (NSS) PCA or LPN for cT1 renal tumors between November 2011 and December 2019. The cohorts were matched by one-to-one propensity scores based on patient demographics, renal function, and tumor complexity. Perioperative and oncological outcomes and preservation of renal function following surgery were compared.
After matching, a total of 180 patients who had undergone NSS for de novo renal tumors were evaluable: 90 for PCA and 90 for LPN. No statistically significant differences were noted among the measured baseline characteristics in the propensity score-matched cohorts. Overall perioperative complication rates were 5.5% in the PCA and 11.1% in the LPN groups (P = 0.28). The rate of eGFR preservation 1 to 3 months after surgery was significantly higher for PCA than for LPN (92.8 ± 11.5% vs. 88.5 ± 14.6%, P = 0.03). Median follow-up was 33 months for PCA and 18 months for LPN (P < 0.001). Three residual and 4 recurrent tumors were later diagnosed in the PCA group and 1 recurrent tumor in the LPN group. The 5-year local recurrence-free survival was lower for PCA than LPN (90.2% vs. 98.5%, P = 0.36). The 5-year metastasis-free survival rate was similar in both groups (98.4% vs. 100%, P = 0.38). The 5-year overall and cancer-specific survival rates were comparable in both groups (91.7% vs. 98.9%, P = 0.53, and 95% vs. 100%, P = 0.55, respectively).
Clinical T1 RCC patients are better treated with LPN if technically possible. Though PCA had a higher local recurrence rate, medium-term local control was not inferior to LPN. Additionally, PCA patients tended to retain renal function without severe complications. PCA appears to be a reasonable option for patients with high comorbidity at presentation.
评估经皮冷冻消融术(PCA)与腹腔镜部分肾切除术(LPN)治疗 cT1 肾肿瘤的临床三联征。
我们回顾性分析了 2011 年 11 月至 2019 年 12 月期间接受 2 种保肾手术(NSS)PCA 或 LPN 治疗 cT1 肾肿瘤的患者记录。根据患者人口统计学、肾功能和肿瘤复杂性,采用 1:1 倾向评分匹配对队列进行匹配。比较了围手术期和肿瘤学结果以及手术后肾功能的保留情况。
匹配后,共有 180 例新诊断肾肿瘤行 NSS 的患者可评估:PCA 组 90 例,LPN 组 90 例。在倾向评分匹配队列中,两组的基线特征无统计学差异。PCA 组和 LPN 组的总围手术期并发症发生率分别为 5.5%和 11.1%(P=0.28)。术后 1-3 个月时 eGFR 保留率 PCA 组明显高于 LPN 组(92.8±11.5%比 88.5±14.6%,P=0.03)。PCA 组和 LPN 组的中位随访时间分别为 33 个月和 18 个月(P<0.001)。PCA 组中诊断出 3 例残余肿瘤和 4 例复发肿瘤,LPN 组中诊断出 1 例复发肿瘤。5 年局部无复发生存率 PCA 组低于 LPN 组(90.2%比 98.5%,P=0.36)。两组 5 年无转移生存率相似(98.4%比 100%,P=0.38)。两组 5 年总生存率和癌症特异性生存率相当(91.7%比 98.9%,P=0.53;95%比 100%,P=0.55)。
如果技术上可行,临床 T1RCC 患者最好采用 LPN 治疗。虽然 PCA 的局部复发率较高,但中期局部控制并不逊于 LPN。此外,PCA 患者倾向于保留肾功能,且无严重并发症。对于初诊时合并症较高的患者,PCA 似乎是一种合理的选择。