Voss Pauline, Schick Maren, Langer Laila, Ainsworth Asrin, Ditzen Beate, Strowitzki Thomas, Wischmann Tewes, Kuon Ruben J
Department of Gynecological Endocrinology and Fertility Disorders, Heidelberg University Women's Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany; Institute of Medical Psychology, Center for Psychosocial Medicine, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Institute of Medical Psychology, Center for Psychosocial Medicine, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany; Ruprecht-Karls Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
Fertil Steril. 2020 Dec;114(6):1288-1296. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2020.08.1421. Epub 2020 Oct 7.
To compare the psychological impact of recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) on affected men and women and to determine risk and protective factors in both partners.
Cross-sectional study.
University-affiliated fertility center.
PATIENT(S): Ninety female/male couples and 14 women.
INTERVENTION(S): Participants completed a questionnaire covering psychological risk factors (ScreenIVF), experience of pregnancy losses, coping strategies, and partnership satisfaction.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Comparison of psychological risk factors, perception of RPL, and coping strategies between both partners and analysis of the influence of risk and protective factors.
RESULT(S): In the ScreenIVF, 47.7% of women versus 19.1% of men showed a risk for anxiety, 51.7% versus 19.1% a risk for depression, and 28.1% versus 30.7% a risk for limited social support. The use of avoiding coping styles seems to be less favorable with regard to the psychological risk than active strategies. Having a child together and a satisfying partnership correlated with a lower risk for depression. Sharing the experience of RPL with others and being in a satisfying relationship correlated with a higher social support.
CONCLUSION(S): Both men and women affected by RPL show high risks for developing depression and anxiety, underlining the importance of also including the male partners. The factors of communication with others, a satisfying relationship, and already having a child together correlate with decreased psychological risks. We advocate for health care professionals to implement screening for anxiety, depression, and social support for both partners and support them in dealing with RPL.
The study is registered in the German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS), number DRKS00014965.
比较复发性流产(RPL)对受影响的男性和女性的心理影响,并确定双方的风险和保护因素。
横断面研究。
大学附属生育中心。
90对男女夫妇和14名女性。
参与者完成了一份问卷,内容涵盖心理风险因素(ScreenIVF)、流产经历、应对策略和伴侣关系满意度。
比较双方的心理风险因素、对复发性流产的认知和应对策略,并分析风险和保护因素的影响。
在ScreenIVF中,47.7%的女性和19.1%的男性显示有焦虑风险,51.7%的女性和19.1%的男性有抑郁风险,28.1%的女性和30.7%的男性有社会支持有限的风险。与积极策略相比,采用回避应对方式在心理风险方面似乎不太有利。共同育有子女和令人满意的伴侣关系与较低的抑郁风险相关。与他人分享复发性流产的经历和处于令人满意的关系中与较高的社会支持相关。
受复发性流产影响的男性和女性都有患抑郁症和焦虑症的高风险,这凸显了纳入男性伴侣的重要性。与他人沟通、令人满意的关系以及已经共同育有子女等因素与心理风险降低相关。我们主张医疗保健专业人员对双方进行焦虑、抑郁和社会支持筛查,并在他们应对复发性流产时提供支持。
该研究已在德国临床试验注册中心(DRKS)注册,编号为DRKS00014965。