Institute of Neuroscience, Université catholique de Louvain, Ave Mounier, 53 - Bte B1.53.04, 1200 Brussels, Belgium.
Institute of Neuroscience, Université catholique de Louvain, Ave Mounier, 53 - Bte B1.53.04, 1200 Brussels, Belgium.
Neuroimage. 2021 Jan 1;224:117435. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117435. Epub 2020 Oct 8.
Inhibitory control underlies the ability to inhibit inappropriate responses and involves processes that suppress motor excitability. Such motor modulatory effect has been largely described during action preparation but very little is known about the neural circuit responsible for its implementation. Here, we addressed this point by studying the degree to which the extent of preparatory suppression relates to brain morphometry. We investigated this relationship in patients suffering from severe alcohol use disorder (AUD) because this population displays an inconsistent level of preparatory suppression and major structural brain damage, making it a suitable sample to measure such link. To do so, 45 detoxified patients underwent a structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and performed a transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) experiment, in which the degree of preparatory suppression was quantified. Besides, behavioral inhibition and trait impulsivity were evaluated in all participants. Overall, whole-brain analyses revealed that a weaker preparatory suppression was associated with a decrease in cortical thickness of a medial prefrontal cluster, encompassing parts of the anterior cingulate cortex and superior-frontal gyrus. In addition, a negative association was observed between the thickness of the supplementary area (SMA)/pre-SMA and behavioral inhibition abilities. Finally, we did not find any significant correlation between preparatory suppression, behavioral inhibition and trait impulsivity, indicating that they represent different facets of inhibitory control. Altogether, the current study provides important insight on the neural regions underlying preparatory suppression and allows highlighting that the excitability of the motor system represents a valuable read-out of upstream cognitive processes.
抑制控制是抑制不当反应的能力,涉及抑制运动兴奋性的过程。这种运动调节效应在动作准备过程中已被广泛描述,但对于负责其实施的神经回路知之甚少。在这里,我们通过研究准备抑制的程度与大脑形态计量学的关系来解决这一问题。我们研究了患有严重酒精使用障碍(AUD)的患者的这种关系,因为该人群表现出不一致的准备抑制水平和主要的结构性脑损伤,使他们成为衡量这种联系的合适样本。为此,45 名戒毒患者接受了结构磁共振成像(MRI)检查,并进行了经颅磁刺激(TMS)实验,以量化准备抑制的程度。此外,所有参与者的行为抑制和特质冲动性都进行了评估。总的来说,全脑分析表明,较弱的准备抑制与内侧前额叶簇的皮质厚度减少有关,该簇包括前扣带皮层和额上回的部分区域。此外,在补充区(SMA)/前 SMA 的厚度与行为抑制能力之间观察到负相关。最后,我们没有发现准备抑制、行为抑制和特质冲动性之间存在任何显著相关性,表明它们代表了抑制控制的不同方面。总之,本研究为准备抑制的神经区域提供了重要的见解,并强调了运动系统的兴奋性是上游认知过程的一个有价值的指标。