Physical Therapy Department, Arcadia University, 450 S Easton Rd., Glenside, PA 19038, United States.
Physical Therapy Department, Arcadia University, 450 S Easton Rd., Glenside, PA 19038, United States; Physical Therapy Department, Moravian College, 1200 Main st., Bethlehem, PA 18018, United States.
Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2020 Dec;80:105189. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2020.105189. Epub 2020 Oct 1.
Shoulder muscle force is commonly assessed during clinical examination using both an isometric "make" test against a fixed resistance or a "break" test where the examiner exerts enough force to break the isometric contraction. The purpose of this study was to explain the difference in force produced during these two forms of testing.
Data were collected on 25 subjects. Both shoulder external rotation and elevation force were measured over three trials, isometrically, for approximately 3 s, after which the examiner exerted enough force to move the arm. Surface EMG was recorded for the infraspinatus for external rotation and middle deltoid for elevation. Peak isometric and break forces, and normalized, averaged EMG data at peak isometric and break forces were compared with paired t-tests.
External rotation peak break force was 46.9% (SD33.6, range - 3% to 108.6%) greater than isometric force (p < 0.01). EMG for the infraspinatus was 17.0% (20.8) greater at break (p < 0.01). For elevation, peak break force was 63% (73.1, range - 3.5 to 238.16%) greater than isometric force (p < 0.01). EMG for the middle deltoid was 11.1% (30.8) greater during peak break force (not significant).
There is a difference in both force and muscle activity between "make" and "break" tests. Clinicians should use a consistent method when measuring force and a break test will provide the maximum force. The cause of greater force produced during a break test is likely attributable to the brief eccentric contraction rather than greater recruitment. Future analysis will include examining the differences in make and break forces based on activity levels.
在临床检查中,通常使用等长“制作”测试(对抗固定阻力)或“打破”测试(检查者施加足够的力以打破等长收缩)来评估肩部肌肉力量。本研究旨在解释这两种测试形式产生的力之间的差异。
共收集了 25 名受试者的数据。在大约 3 秒的时间内,对肩部外旋和外展力进行了三次等长测量,然后检查者施加足够的力来移动手臂。记录外旋时的冈下肌和外展时的中三角肌的表面肌电图。使用配对 t 检验比较等长峰值和突破峰值、峰值等长和突破峰值的归一化平均肌电图数据。
外旋峰值突破力比等长力高 46.9%(SD33.6,范围-3%至 108.6%)(p<0.01)。冈下肌的肌电图在突破时增加了 17.0%(20.8)(p<0.01)。对于外展,峰值突破力比等长力高 63%(73.1,范围-3.5 至 238.16%)(p<0.01)。在突破峰值时,三角肌中部的肌电图增加了 11.1%(30.8)(不显著)。
在“制作”和“突破”测试之间,力和肌肉活动存在差异。临床医生在测量力时应使用一致的方法,突破测试将提供最大力。在突破测试中产生更大力的原因可能归因于短暂的离心收缩,而不是更大的募集。未来的分析将包括根据活动水平检查制作和突破力的差异。