Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Lillebaelt Hospital, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Kolding, Denmark
Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
BMJ Open. 2020 Oct 10;10(10):e038442. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038442.
Undisplaced femoral neck fractures (FNFs) are usually treated by internal fixation (IF) but two randomised controlled trials (RCTs) have demonstrated advantages of treatment with arthroplasty. The complication rate was lowered but there were no clinically improved patient-reported outcome measures (PROM), which could be due to underpowering or choice of selected PROM as the studies do appear to report a better functional outcome. We will conduct an RCT comparing IF with arthroplasties in patients aged over 65 years with an undisplaced FNF.
All hospitals in Denmark treating patients with hip fracture can provide patients for this study; therefore, the study can be considered a national RCT. Patients over 65 years old with an undisplaced FNF will be screened for eligibility and patients will only be excluded if they are unable to understand the study information (due to dementia or language), if they have a posterior tilt >20°, a pathological fracture or they cannot walk. Participants will be electronically randomised (in alternating blocks of 4 or 6) into either IF or arthroplasty. Postoperative care will follow the department standards.Primary and secondary outcomes and measuring points have been established in collaboration with patients with hip fracture by focus group interviews. The primary outcome measure is the New Mobility Score assessed after 1 year. Secondary outcomes are the Oxford Hip Score, EuroQol 5 domain (EQ-5D-5L), degree of posterior tilt, pain Verbal Rating Scale, reoperation and mortality.
The study is approved by the Danish Data Protection Agency (19/7429) and the scientific ethics committee (S-20180036). All participants will sign an informed consent before entering the trial. Because this is a national trial, all relevant healthcare professionals in Denmark will automatically receive the trial results that will be published in international peer-reviewed journals.
ClinicalTrials.gov Registry (NCT04075461).
无移位股骨颈骨折(FNF)通常采用内固定(IF)治疗,但两项随机对照试验(RCT)表明关节置换术治疗具有优势。虽然降低了并发症发生率,但患者报告的预后测量指标(PROM)并无临床改善,这可能是由于研究的效力不足或所选 PROM 造成的,因为这些研究似乎确实报告了更好的功能结果。我们将开展一项 RCT,比较 65 岁以上无移位 FNF 患者采用 IF 与关节置换术的疗效。
丹麦所有治疗髋部骨折的医院均可为该研究提供患者;因此,该研究可被视为一项全国性 RCT。对 65 岁以上无移位 FNF 患者进行筛选以确定其是否符合入选标准,排除标准为无法理解研究信息(由于痴呆或语言障碍)、后倾角度>20°、病理性骨折或无法行走的患者。参与者将通过电子随机分组(交替 4 或 6 个块)分为 IF 组或关节置换组。术后护理将遵循科室标准。主要和次要结局及测量点是通过与髋部骨折患者的焦点小组访谈确定的。主要结局测量指标是 1 年后的新活动评分。次要结局包括牛津髋关节评分、欧洲五维健康量表(EQ-5D-5L)、后倾角度、疼痛视觉模拟评分、再次手术和死亡率。
该研究已获得丹麦数据保护局(19/7429)和科学伦理委员会(S-20180036)的批准。所有参与者在入组前都将签署知情同意书。由于这是一项全国性试验,丹麦的所有相关医疗保健专业人员将自动收到将在国际同行评议期刊上发表的试验结果。
ClinicalTrials.gov 登记(NCT04075461)。