Department of Cardiology (R.Z., C.S., Q.L., C.W., M.C., K.D.), Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, State Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Disease, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Catheterization Laboratories (C.G., L.X., Z.S., B.X.), Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, State Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Disease, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Oct;13(10):e009155. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.120.009155. Epub 2020 Oct 12.
The potential impact of quantitative flow ratio (QFR) based functional Synergy Between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Taxus and Cardiac Surgery (SYNTAX) score (FSS) on prognostication and revascularization strategy choice has not been fully investigated, and the discriminant ability of FSS needs further validation.
QFR was retrospectively analyzed in left main or patients with multivessel coronary artery disease from the PANDA III trial. A total of 607 patients with analyzable QFR in all vessels were included. FSS was counted by summing the individual scores only in ischemia-producing lesions (vessel QFR ≤0.8). Patients were stratified according to tertiles of SYNTAX score (SS), and 3 groups of FSS were divided by the same cutoff score. The primary end point was 2-year major adverse cardiac events (a composite of cardiac death, any myocardial infarction, or ischemia-driven revascularization).
After calculating the FSS, 16% (96/607) of study patients moved from higher-risk group by SS to lower-risk group. In the low, intermediate, and high FSS group, the cumulative incidence of 2-year major adverse cardiac events was 9.1%, 13.5%, and 22.3% (=0.0004), and the rate of a composite of cardiac death or myocardial infarction (3.8%, 7.3%, and 13.7%, =0.0006) was also increased. Compared with SS, FSS significantly improved risk classification and prognostication (area under the curve of the receiver-operating characteristics 0.65 versus 0.62, =0.0009). Moreover, 6% (38/607) of patients, for whom coronary artery bypass grafting would be recommended according to SS, converted to favor percutaneous coronary intervention after FSS calculation. After multivariate adjustment, FSS was an independent predictor of 2-year major adverse cardiac events (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.05 [95% CI, 1.02-1.07]; =0.0001).
Among patients with left main or multivessel coronary artery disease, FSS showed applicability in prognostication and revascularization strategy choice. An improved scoring system combining anatomy and physiology (FSS) discriminated the risk of adverse events modestly better than anatomic assessment (SS) alone. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT02017275. Graphic Abstract: A graphic abstract is available for this article.
定量血流比(QFR)基于功能的紫杉醇与心脏手术之间协同作用的 SYNTAX 评分(FSS)对预后和血运重建策略选择的潜在影响尚未得到充分研究,并且 FSS 的判别能力需要进一步验证。
从 PANDA III 试验中回顾性分析左主干或多支冠状动脉疾病患者的 QFR。所有血管中共有 607 例可分析 QFR 的患者入选。FSS 通过仅对产生缺血的病变(血管 QFR≤0.8)相加个体评分来计算。根据 SYNTAX 评分(SS)的三分位数对患者进行分层,并根据相同的截断值将 3 组 FSS 进行分组。主要终点为 2 年主要不良心脏事件(心脏死亡、任何心肌梗死或缺血驱动的血运重建的复合终点)。
计算 FSS 后,16%(96/607)的研究患者根据 SS 从高风险组转移到低风险组。在低、中、高 FSS 组中,2 年主要不良心脏事件的累积发生率分别为 9.1%、13.5%和 22.3%(=0.0004),复合终点(心脏死亡或心肌梗死)的发生率也分别增加到 3.8%、7.3%和 13.7%(=0.0006)。与 SS 相比,FSS 显著改善了风险分层和预后(受试者工作特征曲线下面积为 0.65 比 0.62,=0.0009)。此外,根据 SS 建议行冠状动脉旁路移植术的 6%(38/607)患者,在计算 FSS 后转为倾向于经皮冠状动脉介入治疗。多变量调整后,FSS 是 2 年主要不良心脏事件的独立预测因子(调整后的危险比,1.05[95%CI,1.02-1.07];=0.0001)。
在左主干或多支冠状动脉疾病患者中,FSS 在预后和血运重建策略选择方面具有适用性。结合解剖学和生理学的改良评分系统(FSS)对不良事件风险的区分能力略优于单纯解剖学评估(SS)。注册:网址:https://www.clinicaltrials.gov。唯一标识符:NCT02017275。图表摘要:本文提供了图表摘要。