Suppr超能文献

考虑预期调整后的效果。

Accounting for Expected Adjusted Effect.

作者信息

Sorjonen Kimmo, Melin Bo, Ingre Michael

机构信息

Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.

Department of Psychology, Faculty of Social Sciences, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2020 Sep 17;11:542082. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.542082. eCollection 2020.

Abstract

The point that adjustment for confounders do not always guarantee protection against spurious findings and type 1-errors has been made before. The present simulation study indicates that for traditional regression methods, this risk is accentuated by a large sample size, low reliability in the measurement of the confounder, and high reliability in the measurement of the predictor and the outcome. However, this risk might be attenuated by calculating the expected adjusted effect, or the required reliability in the measurement of the possible confounder, with equations presented in the present paper.

摘要

之前已经指出,对混杂因素进行调整并不总是能保证防止出现虚假结果和I型错误。目前的模拟研究表明,对于传统回归方法,大样本量、混杂因素测量的低可靠性以及预测变量和结果测量的高可靠性会加剧这种风险。然而,通过使用本文中给出的方程计算预期的调整效应或可能混杂因素测量所需的可靠性,这种风险可能会降低。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7740/7528751/f46db7bfc978/fpsyg-11-542082-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Accounting for Expected Adjusted Effect.
Front Psychol. 2020 Sep 17;11:542082. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.542082. eCollection 2020.
4
Examining the Error of Mis-Specifying Nonlinear Confounding Effect With Application on Accelerometer-Measured Physical Activity.
Res Q Exerc Sport. 2017 Jun;88(2):203-208. doi: 10.1080/02701367.2017.1296101. Epub 2017 Mar 31.
5
Identification of confounder in epidemiologic data contaminated by measurement error in covariates.
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2016 May 18;16:54. doi: 10.1186/s12874-016-0159-6.
6
Using generalized additive models to reduce residual confounding.
Stat Med. 2004 Dec 30;23(24):3781-801. doi: 10.1002/sim.2073.
7
Adjustment for regression dilution in epidemiological regression analyses.
Ann Epidemiol. 1998 Jan;8(1):56-63. doi: 10.1016/s1047-2797(97)00107-5.
9
Assessment of Confounders in Comparative Effectiveness Studies From Secondary Databases.
Am J Epidemiol. 2017 Mar 15;185(6):474-478. doi: 10.1093/aje/kww136.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

1
Identification of confounder in epidemiologic data contaminated by measurement error in covariates.
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2016 May 18;16:54. doi: 10.1186/s12874-016-0159-6.
2
Statistically Controlling for Confounding Constructs Is Harder than You Think.
PLoS One. 2016 Mar 31;11(3):e0152719. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0152719. eCollection 2016.
4
The impact of residual and unmeasured confounding in epidemiologic studies: a simulation study.
Am J Epidemiol. 2007 Sep 15;166(6):646-55. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwm165. Epub 2007 Jul 5.
5
Bias due to non-differential misclassification of polytomous confounders.
J Clin Epidemiol. 1993 Jan;46(1):57-63. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(93)90009-p.
6
The effect of misclassification in the presence of covariates.
Am J Epidemiol. 1980 Oct;112(4):564-9. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a113025.
7
Control of spurious association and the reliability of the controlled variable.
Psychol Bull. 1965 Nov;64(5):326-9. doi: 10.1037/h0022529.
8
Bias in relative odds estimation owing to imprecise measurement of correlated exposures.
Stat Med. 1992 May;11(7):953-61. doi: 10.1002/sim.4780110712.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验