Adiningrat Arya, Kusmaharani Harum Annisa, Utami Sri, Ratna Astuti Novitasari
Department of Oral Biology and Biomedical Sciences, School of Dentistry, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta, Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta, Indonesia.
Clinical Program, School of Dentistry, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta, Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta, Indonesia.
J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2020 Aug 6;10(4):498-503. doi: 10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_46_20. eCollection 2020 Jul-Aug.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the difference in severity of caries code 5 or 6 according to the International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS) among caries risk groups in Pendul district.
This was an observational study with a cross-sectional design. A total of 730 people who were residing in Pendul district belonged to population of this study. One of the inclusion criteria of this study was the people who were ≥5 years old according to World Health Organization. On the basis of our preliminary survey, we confirmed 660 people who fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The subjects were selected using the accidental simple random sampling. Slovin's formula was used with margin of error 8% to obtain the 138 subjected people. Of the 138 subjects studied, there were only 87 people who could be included in the further inclusion criteria by having dental caries code 5 or 6 according to ICDAS. The Kruskal-Wallis statistical test was used to analyze the differences as the data belong to nonparametric and there were three variable groups. Next, the Mann-Whitney was used to test the differences between these variables.
The results of this study showed that there was a significant difference in the severity of caries among caries risk groups ( < 0.05).
The higher the caries risk the higher the caries severity that was observed. This result supported the potential use of caries risk assessment as a predictive and supportive tool to prevent the increasing caries severity in the community.
本研究旨在评估彭杜尔地区龋齿风险组中根据国际龋齿检测与评估系统(ICDAS)划分的5或6级龋齿严重程度的差异。
这是一项采用横断面设计的观察性研究。共有730名居住在彭杜尔地区的人属于本研究的人群。本研究的纳入标准之一是根据世界卫生组织规定年龄≥5岁的人。根据我们的初步调查,我们确认了660名符合纳入标准的人。采用偶然简单随机抽样法选取研究对象。使用斯洛文公式,误差幅度为8%,以获得138名研究对象。在138名研究对象中,只有87人根据ICDAS有5或6级龋齿,可纳入进一步的纳入标准。由于数据属于非参数且有三个变量组,因此使用Kruskal-Wallis统计检验来分析差异。接下来,使用Mann-Whitney检验这些变量之间的差异。
本研究结果表明,龋齿风险组之间的龋齿严重程度存在显著差异(<0.05)。
观察到龋齿风险越高,龋齿严重程度越高。这一结果支持了将龋齿风险评估作为一种预测和支持工具,以防止社区中龋齿严重程度增加的潜在用途。