Witbracht Megan G, Bernstein Olivia M, Lin Vanessa, Salazar Christian R, Sajjadi S Ahmad, Hoang Dan, Cox Chelsea G, Gillen Daniel L, Grill Joshua D
Institute for Memory Impairments and Neurological Disorders, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, United States.
Department of Statistics, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, United States.
Front Med (Lausanne). 2020 Sep 18;7:493. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2020.00493. eCollection 2020.
Reluctance to undergo lumbar puncture (LP) is a barrier to neurological disease biomarker research. We assessed whether an educational intervention increased willingness to consider research LP and whether message framing modified intervention effectiveness. We randomly assigned 851 recruitment registry enrollees who had previously indicated they were unwilling to be contacted about studies requiring LP to gain or loss framed video educational interventions describing the procedure and the probability of experiencing adverse events. The gain framed intervention emphasized the proportion of individuals free of adverse events; the loss frame emphasized the proportion experiencing adverse events. The primary outcome for the study was the participant's post-intervention agreement to be contacted about studies requiring LP. Participants were mean (SD) age 60.1 years (15.7), 69% female ( = 591), and mostly college educated and white. Among the 699 participants who completed the study, 43% (95% CI: 0.39, 0.47; = 301) changed their response to agree to be contacted about studies requiring LP. We estimated that participants randomized to the gain framed intervention had 67% higher odds of changing their response compared to those randomized to the loss frame (Odds Ratio = 1.67; 95% CI: 1.24, 2.26; < 0.001). A classification and regression tree model identified participants' pre-intervention willingness as the strongest predictor of changing response. Education, in particular education that alerts participants to the probability of not experiencing adverse events, may be an effective tool to increase participation rates in research requiring LP.
不愿接受腰椎穿刺(LP)是神经疾病生物标志物研究的一个障碍。我们评估了一项教育干预措施是否能提高考虑参与研究性LP的意愿,以及信息框架是否会改变干预效果。我们将851名招募登记参与者随机分组,这些参与者此前表示不愿被联系参与需要LP的研究,分别给予收益框架或损失框架的视频教育干预,内容描述了该操作及发生不良事件的概率。收益框架干预强调无不良事件个体的比例;损失框架强调发生不良事件个体的比例。该研究的主要结局是参与者在干预后同意被联系参与需要LP的研究。参与者的平均(标准差)年龄为60.1岁(15.7),69%为女性(n = 591),大多受过大学教育且为白人。在完成研究的699名参与者中,43%(95%CI:0.39,0.47;n = 301)改变了他们的回答,同意被联系参与需要LP的研究。我们估计,与被随机分配到损失框架的参与者相比,被随机分配到收益框架干预的参与者改变回答的几率高67%(优势比 = 1.67;95%CI:1.24,2.26;P < 0.001)。一个分类和回归树模型确定参与者干预前的意愿是改变回答的最强预测因素。教育,特别是提醒参与者无不良事件发生概率的教育,可能是提高需要LP的研究参与率的有效工具。