Huang Robert J, Banerjee Subhas, Friedland Shai, Ladabaum Uri
Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States.
The Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, California, United States.
Endosc Int Open. 2020 Oct;8(10):E1495-E1501. doi: 10.1055/a-1242-9958. Epub 2020 Oct 7.
Patients with cirrhosis demonstrate alterations in physiology, hemodynamics, and immunity which may increase procedural risk. There exist sparse data regarding the safety of performing ambulatory colonoscopy in patients with cirrhosis. From a population-based sample of three North American states (California, Florida, and New York), we collected data on 3,590 patients with cirrhosis who underwent ambulatory colonoscopy from 2009 to 2014. We created a control cohort propensity score-matched for cirrhotic severity who did not undergo colonoscopy (N = 3,590) in order to calculate the attributable risk for adverse events. The primary endpoint was the rate of unplanned hospital encounters (UHEs) within 14 days of colonoscopy (or from a synthetic index date for the control cohort). Predictors for UHE were assessed in multivariable regression. The attributable risk for any UHE following colonoscopy was 3.1 % (confidence interval [CI] 2.1-4.1 %, < 0.001). There was increased risk for infection (0.9 %, CI 0.7-1.1 %), spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (0.1 %, CI 0.0-0.3 %), decompensation of ascites (0.3 %, CI 0.2-0.4 %), and cardiovascular event (0.4 %, CI 0.3-0.5 %). There was no increased attributable risk for gastrointestinal bleeding, perforation, or development of the hepatorenal syndrome. The presence of ascites at time of procedure was the only predictor for UHE in the fully-adjusted model (OR 2.6, CI 1.9-3.5, < 0.001). There is a moderate though detectable increase in risk for adverse event following ambulatory colonoscopy in patients with cirrhosis. The presence of ascites in particular portends higher risk. These data may guide clinicians when counseling patients with cirrhosis on the choice of colorectal cancer screening modality.
肝硬化患者在生理、血流动力学和免疫方面存在改变,这可能会增加手术风险。关于为肝硬化患者进行门诊结肠镜检查的安全性,现有数据稀少。我们从北美三个州(加利福尼亚州、佛罗里达州和纽约州)的人群样本中,收集了2009年至2014年接受门诊结肠镜检查的3590例肝硬化患者的数据。我们创建了一个未接受结肠镜检查的、根据肝硬化严重程度进行倾向评分匹配的对照队列(N = 3590),以计算不良事件的归因风险。主要终点是结肠镜检查后14天内(或对照队列的综合指数日期)的非计划性住院次数(UHE)。在多变量回归中评估了UHE的预测因素。结肠镜检查后任何UHE的归因风险为3.1%(置信区间[CI] 2.1 - 4.1%,P < 0.001)。感染风险增加(0.9%,CI 0.7 - 1.1%)、自发性细菌性腹膜炎(0.1%,CI 0.0 - 0.3%)、腹水失代偿(0.3%,CI 0.2 - 0.4%)和心血管事件(0.4%,CI 0.3 - 0.5%)。胃肠道出血、穿孔或肝肾综合征发生的归因风险没有增加。在完全调整模型中,手术时腹水的存在是UHE的唯一预测因素(OR 2.6,CI 1.9 - 3.5,P < 0.001)。肝硬化患者门诊结肠镜检查后不良事件风险虽有适度但可检测到的增加。特别是腹水的存在预示着更高的风险。这些数据可为临床医生在为肝硬化患者提供关于结直肠癌筛查方式选择的咨询时提供指导。