Farzaneh Khadijeh, Mortazavi Seyedeh Hamideh, Oraii Alireza, Abbasi Kyomars, Salehi Omran Abbas, Ahmadi Tafti Seyed Hossein, Bozorgi Ali, Kazemi Saeed Ali, Salarifar Mojtaba, Sadeghian Saeed
Department of Cardiology, Tehran Heart Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Tehran Heart Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
J Card Surg. 2020 Oct;35(10):2522-2528. doi: 10.1111/jocs.14777.
Prosthetic valve thrombosis (PVT) is a rare but life-threatening complication of heart valve replacement. Based on the current guidelines, the treatment of a large number of these patients could be performed through the administration of thrombolytic agents. In the present study, we aim to assess the safety of thrombolytic therapy in patients with PVT who have high international normalized ratio (INR) levels.
In this study, we retrospectively analyzed outcomes of thrombolytic therapy in 65 PVT patients with different levels of INR at the time of fibrinolysis at a tertiary cardiac center.
Mean age of patients was 51.6 ± 12.47 years. The tricuspid valve was the most common site of prosthetic valve thrombosis (64.6%). The Median (range) of INR was 2.1 (0.9-4.9). The majority of patients (50.8%) achieved a complete response following thrombolytic treatment. There were no cases of intracranial hemorrhage. Other major and minor bleedings occurred in 3 (4.6%) and 10 (15.4%) patients, respectively. No embolic stroke and systemic embolism were observed. We found no significant difference in the frequency of major (P-value = .809) and minor (P-value = .483) bleeding as well as response to thrombolytic therapy (P-value = .658) between patients with different levels of INR. Total administered dose of Streptokinase was also similar in PVT patients with or without major (P-value = .467) and minor (P-value = .221) bleeding complications.
We concluded that there was no significant difference between PVT patients presenting with subtherapeutic and high INR levels who received thrombolytic treatments regarding both minor and major bleeding complications as well as response to thrombolysis.
人工瓣膜血栓形成(PVT)是心脏瓣膜置换术后一种罕见但危及生命的并发症。根据现行指南,大量此类患者的治疗可通过使用溶栓药物来进行。在本研究中,我们旨在评估国际标准化比值(INR)水平较高的PVT患者接受溶栓治疗的安全性。
在本研究中,我们回顾性分析了一家三级心脏中心65例在纤溶时INR水平不同的PVT患者接受溶栓治疗的结果。
患者的平均年龄为51.6±12.47岁。三尖瓣是人工瓣膜血栓形成最常见的部位(64.6%)。INR的中位数(范围)为2.1(0.9 - 4.9)。大多数患者(50.8%)在溶栓治疗后获得了完全缓解。未发生颅内出血病例。其他严重和轻微出血分别发生在3例(4.6%)和10例(15.4%)患者中。未观察到栓塞性中风和全身性栓塞。我们发现不同INR水平的患者在严重(P值 = 0.809)和轻微(P值 = 0.483)出血频率以及对溶栓治疗的反应(P值 = 0.658)方面无显著差异。有或无严重(P值 = 0.467)和轻微(P值 = 0.221)出血并发症的PVT患者中链激酶的总给药剂量也相似。
我们得出结论,接受溶栓治疗的INR水平低于治疗范围和高于治疗范围的PVT患者在轻微和严重出血并发症以及溶栓反应方面无显著差异。