COVID-19: scientific reasoning, pragmatism and emotional bias.
作者信息
Gattinoni Luciano, Marini John J, Chiumello Davide, Busana Mattia, Camporota Luigi
机构信息
Department of Anesthesiology, Emergency and Intensive Care Medicine, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Regions Hospital and University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN, USA.
出版信息
Ann Intensive Care. 2020 Oct 12;10(1):134. doi: 10.1186/s13613-020-00756-7.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
COVID-19: scientific reasoning, pragmatism and emotional bias.新冠病毒病：科学推理、实用主义与情感偏见
Ann Intensive Care. 2020 Oct 12;10(1):134. doi: 10.1186/s13613-020-00756-7.
2
Does emotional reasoning change during cognitive behavioural therapy for anxiety?在针对焦虑症的认知行为疗法中，情绪推理会发生变化吗？
Cogn Behav Ther. 2016;45(2):123-35. doi: 10.1080/16506073.2015.1115892. Epub 2016 Jan 6.
3
Freestanding pragmatism in law and bioethics.法律与生物伦理学中的独立实用主义。
Theor Med Bioeth. 2001;22(2):69-85. doi: 10.1023/a:1011495624471.
4
Emotional reasoning and parent-based reasoning in non-clinical children, and their prospective relationships with anxiety symptoms.非临床儿童的情绪推理和基于父母的推理及其与焦虑症状的前瞻性关系。
Child Psychiatry Hum Dev. 2008 Dec;39(4):351-67. doi: 10.1007/s10578-007-0091-4. Epub 2008 Jan 15.
5
Pragmatism: a practical philosophy for environmental scientists.实用主义：环境科学家的实用哲学。
Integr Environ Assess Manag. 2013 Apr;9(2):181-4. doi: 10.1002/ieam.1382. Epub 2013 Feb 14.
6
Explaining modulation of reasoning by belief.解释信念对推理的调节作用。
Cognition. 2003 Feb;87(1):B11-22. doi: 10.1016/s0010-0277(02)00185-3.
7
Are trials of psychological and psychosocial interventions for schizophrenia and psychosis included in the NICE guidelines pragmatic? A systematic review.英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所（NICE）实用指南中是否纳入了精神分裂症和精神病的心理和心理社会干预试验？系统评价。
PLoS One. 2019 Sep 24;14(9):e0222891. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0222891. eCollection 2019.
8
Belief bias and figural bias in syllogistic reasoning.三段论推理中的信念偏差和图形偏差。
Q J Exp Psychol A. 2004 May;57(4):666-92. doi: 10.1080/02724980343000440.
9
The development of scientific reasoning in medical education: a psychological perspective.医学教育中科学推理能力的发展：心理学视角
Clujul Med. 2016;89(1):32-7. doi: 10.15386/cjmed-530. Epub 2016 Jan 15.
10
"Wise reasoning benefits from emodiversity, irrespective of emotional intensity": Correction to Grossmann, Oakes, and Santos (2019).“明智推理受益于情绪多样性，与情绪强度无关”：对格罗斯曼、奥克斯和桑托斯（2019年）的修正
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2019 May;148(5):862. doi: 10.1037/xge0000626.
引用本文的文献
1
Combining O High Flow Nasal or Non-Invasive Ventilation with Cooperative Sedation to Avoid Intubation in Early Diffuse Severe Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Especially in Immunocompromised or COVID Patients?将高流量鼻导管通气或无创通气与协同镇静相结合，以避免早期弥漫性重症呼吸窘迫综合征患者插管，尤其是免疫功能低下或新冠患者？
J Crit Care Med (Targu Mures). 2024 Oct 31;10(4):291-315. doi: 10.2478/jccm-2024-0035. eCollection 2024 Oct.
2
Improved understanding of the respiratory drive pathophysiology could lead to earlier spontaneous breathing in severe acute respiratory distress syndrome.对呼吸驱动病理生理学的深入理解可能会使重症急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者更早地实现自主呼吸。
Eur J Anaesthesiol Intensive Care. 2023 Aug 24;2(5):e0030. doi: 10.1097/EA9.0000000000000030. eCollection 2023 Oct.
3
Patient self-inflicted lung injury associated pneumothorax/pneumomediastinum is a risk factor for worse outcomes of severe COVID-19: a case-control study.患者自伤性肺损伤相关气胸/纵隔气肿是重症 COVID-19 预后不良的危险因素：一项病例对照研究。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jul 4;14(1):15437. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-66229-0.
4
Predictive Factors of Oxygen Therapy Failure in Patients with COVID-19 in the Emergency Department.急诊科新冠肺炎患者氧疗失败的预测因素
Open Access Emerg Med. 2023 Oct 4;15:355-365. doi: 10.2147/OAEM.S430600. eCollection 2023.
5
Is COVID-19 different from other causes of acute respiratory distress syndrome?新型冠状病毒肺炎与其他导致急性呼吸窘迫综合征的病因有何不同？
J Intensive Med. 2023 Apr 11;3(3):212-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jointm.2023.02.003.
6
Defining Failure of Noninvasive Ventilation for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: Have We Succeeded?定义急性呼吸窘迫综合征无创通气失败：我们成功了吗？
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2022 Feb;19(2):167-169. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.202109-1059ED.
7
Impact of time to intubation on mortality and pulmonary sequelae in critically ill patients with COVID-19: a prospective cohort study.COVID-19 危重症患者插管时间对死亡率和肺部后遗症的影响：一项前瞻性队列研究。
Crit Care. 2022 Jan 10;26(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s13054-021-03882-1.
8
Noninvasive respiratory support and patient self-inflicted lung injury in COVID-19: a narrative review.COVID-19 患者的无创性呼吸支持与患者自伤性肺损伤：叙述性综述。
Br J Anaesth. 2021 Sep;127(3):353-364. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2021.05.024. Epub 2021 Jun 3.
9
Implications of early respiratory support strategies on disease progression in critical COVID-19: a matched subanalysis of the prospective RISC-19-ICU cohort.早期呼吸支持策略对危重新冠肺炎疾病进展的影响：前瞻性 RISC-19-ICU 队列的匹配亚组分析。
Crit Care. 2021 May 25;25(1):175. doi: 10.1186/s13054-021-03580-y.
10
P-SILI as justification for intubation in COVID-19: readers as arbiters.将新冠肺炎患者的进行性严重低氧性呼吸衰竭作为插管的依据：以读者为仲裁者。
Ann Intensive Care. 2020 Nov 18;10(1):156. doi: 10.1186/s13613-020-00774-5.
本文引用的文献
1
P-SILI is not justification for intubation of COVID-19 patients.新冠肺炎患者发生肺型重症肌无力并非气管插管的理由。
Ann Intensive Care. 2020 Aug 3;10(1):105. doi: 10.1186/s13613-020-00724-1.
2
Spontaneous breathing, transpulmonary pressure and mathematical trickery.自主呼吸、跨肺压与数学技巧
Ann Intensive Care. 2020 Jul 8;10(1):88. doi: 10.1186/s13613-020-00708-1.
3
Early Inspiratory Effort Assessment by Esophageal Manometry Predicts Noninvasive Ventilation Outcome in Respiratory Failure. A Pilot Study.食管测压法早期吸气努力评估预测呼吸衰竭患者无创通气结局：一项初步研究。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2020 Aug 15;202(4):558-567. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201912-2512OC.
4
Basing Respiratory Management of COVID-19 on Physiological Principles.基于生理原理进行新型冠状病毒肺炎的呼吸管理
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2020 Jun 1;201(11):1319-1320. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202004-1076ED.
5
The pathology of asthma, with special reference to changes in the bronchial mucosa.哮喘的病理学，特别提及支气管黏膜的变化。
J Clin Pathol. 1960 Jan;13(1):27-33. doi: 10.1136/jcp.13.1.27.
6
Mechanical forces producing pulmonary edema in acute asthma.急性哮喘中产生肺水肿的机械力。
N Engl J Med. 1977 Sep 15;297(11):592-6. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197709152971107.
Zotero 插件