Department of Medicine (O.U.), Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY.
Department of Epidemiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham (E.B.L., L.C.).
Circ Heart Fail. 2020 Nov;13(11):e006977. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.120.006977. Epub 2020 Oct 13.
Despite potential harm that can result from polypharmacy, real-world data on polypharmacy in the setting of heart failure (HF) are limited. We sought to address this knowledge gap by studying older adults hospitalized for HF derived from the REGARDS study (Reasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke).
We examined 558 older adults aged ≥65 years with adjudicated HF hospitalizations from 380 hospitals across the United States. We collected and examined data from the REGARDS baseline assessment, medical charts from HF-adjudicated hospitalizations, the American Hospital Association annual survey database, and Medicare's Hospital Compare website. We counted the number of medications taken at hospital admission and discharge; and classified each medication as HF-related, non-HF cardiovascular-related, or noncardiovascular-related.
The vast majority of participants (84% at admission and 95% at discharge) took ≥5 medications; and 42% at admission and 55% at discharge took ≥10 medications. The prevalence of taking ≥10 medications (polypharmacy) increased over the study period. As the number of total medications increased, the number of noncardiovascular medications increased more rapidly than the number of HF-related or non-HF cardiovascular medications.
Defining polypharmacy as taking ≥10 medications might be more ideal in the HF population as most patients already take ≥5 medications. Polypharmacy is common both at admission and hospital discharge, and its prevalence is rising over time. The majority of medications taken by older adults with HF are noncardiovascular medications. There is a need to develop strategies that can mitigate the negative effects of polypharmacy among older adults with HF.
尽管多药治疗可能会带来潜在危害,但心力衰竭(HF)背景下多药治疗的真实世界数据有限。我们通过研究源自 REGARDS 研究(中风的地理和种族差异原因)的老年 HF 住院患者,旨在填补这一知识空白。
我们纳入了来自美国 380 家医院的 558 名年龄≥65 岁、经判定为 HF 住院的老年人。我们收集和检查了 REGARDS 基线评估、HF 判定住院的病历、美国医院协会年度调查数据库和 Medicare 的 Hospital Compare 网站的数据。我们记录了入院和出院时服用的药物数量,并将每种药物分类为 HF 相关、非 HF 心血管相关或非心血管相关。
绝大多数患者(入院时 84%,出院时 95%)服用≥5 种药物;入院时 42%,出院时 55%服用≥10 种药物。在研究期间,服用≥10 种药物(多药治疗)的比例逐渐增加。随着总药物数量的增加,非心血管药物的数量增加速度快于 HF 相关或非 HF 心血管药物。
将服用≥10 种药物定义为多药治疗可能更适合 HF 人群,因为大多数患者已经服用≥5 种药物。多药治疗在入院和出院时都很常见,而且随着时间的推移,其流行率也在上升。HF 老年患者服用的大多数药物是非心血管药物。需要制定策略来减轻 HF 老年患者多药治疗的负面影响。