Lam Alexander, Schwertner Adam, Katrivesis James, Fernando Dayantha, Nelson Kari, Abi-Jaoudeh Nadine
Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, School of Medicine, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Department of Radiological Sciences, University of California, Irvine, School of Medicine, Orange, CA, USA.
Vascular. 2020 Dec;28(6):747-755. doi: 10.1177/1708538120932713. Epub 2020 Jun 17.
To compare perioperative outcomes related to atherectomy with percutaneous transluminal angioplasty versus percutaneous transluminal angioplasty alone for the treatment of lower extremity chronic limb threatening ischemia using a national patient database.
Patients with chronic limb threatening ischemia treated with atherectomy and percutaneous transluminal angioplasty or percutaneous transluminal angioplasty alone from 2011 to 2016 in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database were identified. Primary outcomes were major adverse limb events (30-day untreated loss of patency, major reintervention, major amputation) and major adverse cardiac events (cardiac arrest, composite outcome of myocardial infarction or stroke). Secondary outcomes included 30-day mortality, length of stay, and any unplanned readmission within 30 days. Multivariate regression analyses were performed to determine independent predictors of outcome. Propensity score matched cohort analysis was performed. A -value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Subgroup analyses of femoropopliteal and infrapopliteal interventions were performed.
In total, 2636 (77.2%) patients were treated with percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and 778 (22.8%) were treated with atherectomy and percutaneous transluminal angioplasty. Multivariate analyses of the unadjusted cohort revealed no significant differences in major adverse cardiac events or major adverse limb events between the two groups (-value >0.05). Subgroup analysis of femoropopliteal interventions demonstrated a significantly decreased likelihood of untreated loss of patency in 30 days in the atherectomy group compared to the percutaneous transluminal angioplasty group (1.1% vs. 2.7%, respectively; -value = 0.034), which persisted on propensity score matched analysis (1.1% vs. 3.1%, respectively; -value = 0.026).
Atherectomy with balloon angioplasty of femoropopliteal disease provides a significant decrease in untreated loss of patency compared to balloon angioplasty alone.
利用全国患者数据库,比较血管斑块旋切术联合经皮腔内血管成形术与单纯经皮腔内血管成形术治疗下肢慢性肢体威胁性缺血的围手术期结局。
在国家外科质量改进计划数据库中,识别出2011年至2016年期间接受血管斑块旋切术联合经皮腔内血管成形术或单纯经皮腔内血管成形术治疗的慢性肢体威胁性缺血患者。主要结局为严重肢体不良事件(30天内未处理的通畅性丧失、再次进行重大干预、大截肢)和严重心脏不良事件(心脏骤停、心肌梗死或中风的综合结局)。次要结局包括30天死亡率、住院时间以及30天内的任何非计划再入院情况。进行多因素回归分析以确定结局的独立预测因素。进行倾向评分匹配队列分析。P值<0.05被认为具有统计学意义。对股腘动脉和腘以下动脉干预进行亚组分析。
总共2636例(77.2%)患者接受了经皮腔内血管成形术治疗,778例(22.8%)患者接受了血管斑块旋切术联合经皮腔内血管成形术治疗。对未调整队列的多因素分析显示,两组之间的严重心脏不良事件或严重肢体不良事件无显著差异(P值>0.05)。股腘动脉干预的亚组分析表明,与经皮腔内血管成形术组相比,血管斑块旋切术组30天内未处理的通畅性丧失可能性显著降低(分别为1.1%和2.7%;P值=0.034),在倾向评分匹配分析中这一差异仍然存在(分别为1.1%和3.1%;P值=0.026)。
与单纯球囊血管成形术相比,股腘动脉疾病的血管斑块旋切术联合球囊血管成形术可显著降低未处理的通畅性丧失。