• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

下肢慢性肢体威胁性缺血的初次搭桥术与初次血管成形术/支架置入术的结果。

Results for primary bypass versus primary angioplasty/stent for lower extremity chronic limb-threatening ischemia.

作者信息

Darling Jeremy D, McCallum John C, Soden Peter A, Korepta Lindsey, Guzman Raul J, Wyers Mark C, Hamdan Allen D, Schermerhorn Marc L

机构信息

Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass.

Michigan State University College of Human Medicine, East Lansing, Mich.

出版信息

J Vasc Surg. 2017 Aug;66(2):466-475. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2017.01.024. Epub 2017 Mar 6.

DOI:10.1016/j.jvs.2017.01.024
PMID:28274753
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5524588/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Long-term results comparing percutaneous transluminal angioplasty with or without stenting (PTA/S) and open surgical bypass for chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) in patients who have had no prior intervention are lacking.

METHODS

All patients undergoing a first-time lower extremity revascularization for CLTI by vascular surgeons at our institution from 2005 to 2014 were retrospectively reviewed. Outcomes included perioperative complications, wound healing, restenosis, primary patency, reintervention, major amputation, RAS events (ie, reintervention, major amputation, or stenosis), and mortality. Outcomes were evaluated using χ, Kaplan-Meier, and Cox regression analyses.

RESULTS

Of the 2869 total lower extremity revascularizations performed between 2005 and 2014, there were 1336 that fit our criteria of a first-time lower extremity intervention for CLTI (668 bypass procedures and 668 PTA/S procedures). Bypass patients were younger (71 vs 72 years; P = .02) and more often male (62% vs 56%; P < .02). Total mean hospital length of stay (LOS) was significantly longer after a first-time bypass (10 vs 8 days; P < .001), as were mean preoperative LOS (4 vs 3 days; P < .01) and postoperative LOS (7 vs 5 days; P < .001). There was no difference in perioperative mortality (3% vs 3%; P = .63). Surgical site infection occurred in 10% of bypass patients. Freedom from reintervention was significantly higher in patients undergoing a first-time bypass procedure (62% vs 52% at 3 years; P = .04), as was freedom from restenosis (61% vs 45% at 3 years; P < .001). Complete wound healing at 6-month follow-up was significantly better after an initial bypass (43% vs 36%; P < .01). A Cox regression model of all patients showed that reintervention was predicted by a first-time PTA/S (hazard ratio, 1.6; 95% confidence interval, 1.3-2.1) and both preoperative femoropopliteal TransAtlantic Inter-Society Consensus (TASC) C and TASC D lesions (2.0 [1.3-3.1] and 1.8 [1.3-2.7], respectively). Major amputation among all patients was predicted by an initial presentation of gangrene (2.5 [1.3-5.0]), dialysis dependence (1.9 [1.3-2.9]), diabetes (2.0 [1.1-3.8]), and preoperative femoropopliteal TASC D lesions (2.1 [1.1-4.0]) and was not predicted by procedure type.

CONCLUSIONS

In this retrospective analysis, bypass for the primary treatment of CLTI showed improved 6-month wound healing, higher freedom from restenosis, improved patency rates, significantly fewer reinterventions, and higher survival than PTA/S within 3 years; however, a bypass-first approach was associated with increased total hospital LOS and wound infection. Perioperative mortality and amputation rates were similar between procedure types.

摘要

背景

对于既往未接受过干预的慢性肢体威胁性缺血(CLTI)患者,比较经皮腔内血管成形术(无论是否置入支架,即PTA/S)与开放性手术旁路移植术的长期结果尚缺乏相关研究。

方法

对2005年至2014年期间在我院血管外科首次接受CLTI下肢血运重建术的所有患者进行回顾性分析。观察指标包括围手术期并发症、伤口愈合情况、再狭窄、原发性通畅率、再次干预、大截肢、RAS事件(即再次干预、大截肢或狭窄)以及死亡率。采用χ²检验、Kaplan-Meier法和Cox回归分析对观察指标进行评估。

结果

在2005年至2014年期间共进行的2869例下肢血运重建术中,有1336例符合我们对CLTI首次下肢干预的标准(668例旁路移植术和668例PTA/S手术)。接受旁路移植术的患者更年轻(71岁对72岁;P = 0.02),男性比例更高(62%对56%;P < 0.02)。首次旁路移植术后总的平均住院时间(LOS)显著更长(10天对8天;P < 0.001),术前平均LOS(4天对3天;P < 0.01)和术后LOS(7天对5天;P < 0.001)也是如此。围手术期死亡率无差异(3%对3%;P = 0.63)。10%的旁路移植术患者发生手术部位感染。首次接受旁路移植术的患者再次干预的自由度显著更高(3年时为62%对52%;P = 0.04),无再狭窄的自由度也是如此(3年时为61%对45%;P < 0.001)。初次旁路移植术后6个月随访时完全伤口愈合情况显著更好(43%对36%;P < 0.01)。对所有患者的Cox回归模型显示,首次PTA/S(风险比,1.6;95%置信区间,1.3 - 2.1)以及术前股腘动脉跨大西洋两岸血管外科学会共识(TASC)C型和T型病变(分别为2.0 [1.3 - 3.1]和1.8 [1.3 - 2.7])可预测再次干预。所有患者中的大截肢可通过坏疽的初始表现(2.5 [1.3 - 5.0])、透析依赖(1.9 [1.3 - 2.9])、糖尿病(2.0 [1.1 - 3.8])以及术前股腘动脉TASC D型病变(2.1 [1.1 - 4.0])进行预测,且与手术类型无关。

结论

在这项回顾性分析中,CLTI的初次治疗采用旁路移植术与PTA/S相比,6个月时伤口愈合情况改善、无再狭窄自由度更高、通畅率提高、再次干预显著减少且3年内生存率更高;然而,先行旁路移植术的方法与总住院LOS增加和伤口感染相关。不同手术类型的围手术期死亡率和截肢率相似。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5990/5524588/50b633419aae/nihms857486f7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5990/5524588/8421fb10b8ae/nihms857486f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5990/5524588/6a2a4b22806c/nihms857486f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5990/5524588/71306cb3eaa6/nihms857486f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5990/5524588/5cc2035b0938/nihms857486f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5990/5524588/94c72660d232/nihms857486f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5990/5524588/b2eb4b993cb2/nihms857486f6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5990/5524588/50b633419aae/nihms857486f7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5990/5524588/8421fb10b8ae/nihms857486f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5990/5524588/6a2a4b22806c/nihms857486f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5990/5524588/71306cb3eaa6/nihms857486f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5990/5524588/5cc2035b0938/nihms857486f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5990/5524588/94c72660d232/nihms857486f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5990/5524588/b2eb4b993cb2/nihms857486f6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5990/5524588/50b633419aae/nihms857486f7.jpg

相似文献

1
Results for primary bypass versus primary angioplasty/stent for lower extremity chronic limb-threatening ischemia.下肢慢性肢体威胁性缺血的初次搭桥术与初次血管成形术/支架置入术的结果。
J Vasc Surg. 2017 Aug;66(2):466-475. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2017.01.024. Epub 2017 Mar 6.
2
Outcomes after first-time lower extremity revascularization for chronic limb-threatening ischemia in insulin-dependent diabetic patients.胰岛素依赖型糖尿病患者首次下肢血管重建治疗慢性肢体威胁性缺血后的结局
J Vasc Surg. 2018 Nov;68(5):1455-1464.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2018.01.055.
3
Outcomes after first-time lower extremity revascularization for chronic limb-threatening ischemia between patients with and without diabetes.糖尿病患者与非糖尿病患者初次下肢血运重建治疗慢性肢体严重缺血的结局。
J Vasc Surg. 2018 Apr;67(4):1159-1169. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2017.06.119. Epub 2017 Sep 22.
4
Wound location is independently associated with adverse outcomes following first-time revascularization for tissue loss.伤口位置与首次血运重建治疗组织损失后的不良结局独立相关。
J Vasc Surg. 2021 Apr;73(4):1320-1331. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2020.07.091. Epub 2020 Aug 29.
5
Comparison of Endovascular Versus Bypass Surgery in Femoropopliteal TASC II D Lesions: A Single-Center Study.股腘动脉TASC II D型病变的血管内治疗与旁路手术比较:一项单中心研究
Ann Vasc Surg. 2018 Feb;47:179-187. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2017.09.008. Epub 2017 Sep 22.
6
In Situ Vein Bypass Is Superior to Endovascular Treatment of Femoropopliteal Lesions in Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia.原位静脉旁路术在慢性肢体威胁性缺血中治疗股腘动脉病变优于血管腔内治疗。
Ann Vasc Surg. 2020 Aug;67:437-447. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2020.03.035. Epub 2020 Mar 29.
7
Results for primary bypass versus primary angioplasty/stent for intermittent claudication due to superficial femoral artery occlusive disease.股浅动脉闭塞性疾病引起间歇性跛行的直接旁路与直接血管成形术/支架术的比较结果。
J Vasc Surg. 2012 Apr;55(4):1001-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2011.10.128. Epub 2012 Feb 1.
8
Impact of angiosome- and nonangiosome-targeted peroneal bypass on limb salvage and healing in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia.血管体靶向和非血管体靶向腓动脉旁路移植术对慢性肢体威胁性缺血患者肢体挽救及愈合的影响
J Vasc Surg. 2017 Nov;66(5):1479-1487. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2017.04.074. Epub 2017 Jul 26.
9
Impact of femoropopliteal endovascular interventions on subsequent open bypass.股腘动脉血管腔内介入治疗对后续开放旁路手术的影响。
J Vasc Surg. 2016 Sep;64(3):623-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2016.03.467. Epub 2016 Jun 8.
10
Clinical outcomes of bypass-first versus endovascular-first strategy in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia due to infrageniculate arterial disease.对于因膝下动脉疾病导致慢性肢体威胁性缺血的患者,采用旁路优先与血管内优先策略的临床结果。
J Vasc Surg. 2019 Jan;69(1):156-163.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2018.05.244.

引用本文的文献

1
Technique and early results of percutaneous femoropopliteal bypass with stent graft.带覆膜支架的经皮股腘动脉搭桥术的技术及早期结果
J Vasc Surg Cases Innov Tech. 2023 Sep 9;9(4):101317. doi: 10.1016/j.jvscit.2023.101317. eCollection 2023 Dec.
2
Endovascular revascularization vs. open surgical revascularization for patients with lower extremity artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.下肢动脉疾病患者的血管内血运重建与开放手术血运重建:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023 Jul 24;10:1223841. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1223841. eCollection 2023.
3
Endovascular Revascularization and Outcomes of Critical Limb-Threatening Ischemia in Trinidad and Tobago: The EVENT Pilot Study-Challenges in a Limited-Resource, Caribbean Setting.

本文引用的文献

1
Predictive ability of the Society for Vascular Surgery Wound, Ischemia, and foot Infection (WIfI) classification system following infrapopliteal endovascular interventions for critical limb ischemia.血管外科学会伤口、缺血和足部感染(WIfI)分类系统对严重肢体缺血患者腘下血管腔内介入治疗后的预测能力。
J Vasc Surg. 2016 Sep;64(3):616-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2016.03.417. Epub 2016 Jul 2.
2
Relation of Baseline Renal Dysfunction With Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Popliteal and Infrapopliteal Percutaneous Peripheral Arterial Interventions.腘动脉及腘以下经皮外周动脉介入治疗患者基线肾功能不全与预后的关系
Am J Cardiol. 2016 Jul 15;118(2):298-302. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2016.04.029. Epub 2016 May 4.
3
特立尼达和多巴哥严重肢体缺血的血管内血运重建及预后:EVENT试点研究——资源有限的加勒比地区环境中的挑战
Cardiol Ther. 2023 Sep;12(3):511-524. doi: 10.1007/s40119-023-00322-9. Epub 2023 Jun 17.
4
Amputation and limb salvage following endovascular and open surgery for the treatment of peripheral artery illnesses: A meta-analysis.血管内和开放手术治疗外周动脉疾病后的截肢和保肢:一项荟萃分析。
Int Wound J. 2023 Nov;20(9):3558-3566. doi: 10.1111/iwj.14229. Epub 2023 Jun 16.
5
Discrete Event Simulation Model for Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation of Screening for Asymptomatic Patients with Lower Extremity Arterial Disease.下肢动脉疾病无症状患者筛查的成本效益评估的离散事件模拟模型。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Sep 19;19(18):11792. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191811792.
6
Post-surgical wireless monitoring of arterial health progression.术后动脉健康进展的无线监测
iScience. 2021 Sep 2;24(9):103079. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2021.103079. eCollection 2021 Sep 24.
7
A nomogram for predicting postoperative pulmonary infection in esophageal cancer patients.食管癌患者术后肺部感染预测的列线图。
BMC Pulm Med. 2021 Sep 6;21(1):283. doi: 10.1186/s12890-021-01656-7.
8
Asia-Pacific Consensus Statement on the Management of Peripheral Artery Disease: A Report from the Asian Pacific Society of Atherosclerosis and Vascular Disease Asia-Pacific Peripheral Artery Disease Consensus Statement Project Committee.亚太共识声明:外周动脉疾病管理:来自亚太动脉粥样硬化和血管疾病学会外周动脉疾病共识声明项目委员会的报告。
J Atheroscler Thromb. 2020 Aug 1;27(8):809-907. doi: 10.5551/jat.53660. Epub 2020 Jul 4.
9
The role of reconstructive microsurgery in treating lower-extremity chronic wounds.重建显微外科在治疗下肢慢性创面中的作用。
Int Wound J. 2019 Aug;16(4):951-959. doi: 10.1111/iwj.13127. Epub 2019 May 30.
10
Clinical outcomes of bypass-first versus endovascular-first strategy in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia due to infrageniculate arterial disease.对于因膝下动脉疾病导致慢性肢体威胁性缺血的患者,采用旁路优先与血管内优先策略的临床结果。
J Vasc Surg. 2019 Jan;69(1):156-163.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2018.05.244.
Growing impact of restenosis on the surgical treatment of peripheral arterial disease.
再狭窄对周围动脉疾病手术治疗的影响日益增大。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2013 Nov 25;2(6):e000345. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.113.000345.
4
Outcomes following infrapopliteal angioplasty for critical limb ischemia.下肢动脉腔内成形术治疗严重肢体缺血的结果。
J Vasc Surg. 2013 Jun;57(6):1455-63; discussion 1463-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2012.10.109. Epub 2013 Feb 1.
5
Critical limb ischaemia: initial treatment and predictors of amputation-free survival.严重肢体缺血:初始治疗和免于截肢的生存预测因素。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2012 Jan;43(1):55-61. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2011.09.010. Epub 2011 Oct 15.
6
Surgical implications of early failed endovascular intervention of the superficial femoral artery.股浅动脉早期血管内介入治疗失败的手术意义
J Vasc Surg. 2008 Mar;47(3):562-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2007.11.044.
7
Inter-Society Consensus for the Management of Peripheral Arterial Disease (TASC II).外周动脉疾病管理跨学会共识(TASC II)
J Vasc Surg. 2007 Jan;45 Suppl S:S5-67. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2006.12.037.
8
Bypass versus angioplasty in severe ischaemia of the leg (BASIL): multicentre, randomised controlled trial.严重下肢缺血的搭桥术与血管成形术对比研究(BASIL):多中心随机对照试验
Lancet. 2005 Dec 3;366(9501):1925-34. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67704-5.
9
Risk factors, medical therapies and perioperative events in limb salvage surgery: observations from the PREVENT III multicenter trial.保肢手术中的危险因素、医学治疗及围手术期事件:来自PREVENT III多中心试验的观察结果
J Vasc Surg. 2005 Sep;42(3):456-64; discussion 464-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2005.05.001.
10
Meta-analysis of alternate autologous vein bypass grafts to infrapopliteal arteries.自体静脉替代移植至腘动脉以下动脉的荟萃分析。
J Vasc Surg. 2005 Sep;42(3):449-55. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2005.05.031.