• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

加拿大艾伯塔省和安大略省急诊频繁就诊者和患者流量:一项行政数据研究。

Frequent users of emergency departments and patient flow in Alberta and Ontario, Canada: an administrative data study.

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine & Dentistry, University of Alberta, 3-524 Edmonton Clinic Health Academy, Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 1C9, Canada.

Emergency Strategic Clinical Network, Alberta Health Services, Edmonton, Alberta, T5J 3E4, Canada.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Oct 12;20(1):938. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05774-6.

DOI:10.1186/s12913-020-05774-6
PMID:33046071
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7552544/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This paper describes and compares patient flow characteristics of adult high system users (HSUs) and control groups in Alberta and Ontario emergency departments (EDs), Canada.

METHODS

Annual cohorts of HSUs were created by identifying patients who made up the top 10% of ED users (by count of ED presentations) in the National Ambulatory Care Reporting System during 2011-2016. Random samples of patients not in the HSU groups were selected as controls. Presentation (e.g., acuity) and ED times (e.g., time to physician initial assessment [PIA], length of stay) data were extracted and described. The length of stay for 2015/2016 data was decomposed into stages and Cox models compared time between stages.

RESULTS

There were 20,343,230 and 18,222,969 ED presentations made by 7,032,655 and 1,923,462 individuals in the control and HSU groups, respectively. The Ontario groups had higher acuity than the Alberta groups: about 20% in the Ontario groups were from the emergent level whereas Alberta had 11-15%. Time to PIA was similar across provinces and groups (medians of 60 min to 67 min). Lengths of stay were longest for Ontario HSUs (median = 3 h) and shortest for Alberta HSUs (median = 2.2 h). HSUs had shorter times to PIA (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.03; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.02,1.03), longer times from PIA to decision (HR = 0.84; 95%CI 0.84,0.84), and longer times from decision to leaving the ED (HR = 0.91; 95%CI 0.91,0.91).

CONCLUSIONS

Ontario HSUs had higher acuity and longer ED lengths of stay than the other groups. In both provinces, HSU had shorter times to PIA and longer times after assessment.

摘要

背景

本文描述并比较了加拿大艾伯塔省和安大略省急诊部(ED)中成人高系统使用者(HSU)和对照组患者的流动特征。

方法

通过识别 2011-2016 年国家门诊护理报告系统中 ED 就诊次数最多的前 10%患者(按 ED 就诊次数计算),创建了 HSU 的年度队列。选择 HSU 组以外的随机患者样本作为对照组。提取并描述了就诊(如急症程度)和 ED 时间(如医生初始评估[PIA]时间、住院时间)数据。对 2015/2016 年数据的住院时间进行了阶段分解,并通过 Cox 模型比较了各阶段之间的时间。

结果

在对照组和 HSU 组中,分别有 20,343,230 和 18,222,969 人次的 ED 就诊,分别涉及 7,032,655 和 1,923,462 人。安大略省的就诊患者病情比艾伯塔省更严重:安大略省约有 20%的患者属于紧急级别,而艾伯塔省为 11-15%。PIA 时间在各省和组之间相似(中位数为 60-67 分钟)。住院时间最长的是安大略省 HSU(中位数为 3 小时),最短的是艾伯塔省 HSU(中位数为 2.2 小时)。HSU 患者的 PIA 时间更短(危险比[HR]为 1.03;95%置信区间[CI]为 1.02,1.03),PIA 到决策的时间更长(HR 为 0.84;95%CI 为 0.84,0.84),从决策到离开 ED 的时间更长(HR 为 0.91;95%CI 为 0.91,0.91)。

结论

安大略省 HSU 的急症程度和 ED 住院时间长于其他组。在这两个省,HSU 的 PIA 时间更短,评估后时间更长。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bbe5/7552544/1a59ef5c956d/12913_2020_5774_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bbe5/7552544/86fcd390d1c6/12913_2020_5774_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bbe5/7552544/1a59ef5c956d/12913_2020_5774_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bbe5/7552544/86fcd390d1c6/12913_2020_5774_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bbe5/7552544/1a59ef5c956d/12913_2020_5774_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Frequent users of emergency departments and patient flow in Alberta and Ontario, Canada: an administrative data study.加拿大艾伯塔省和安大略省急诊频繁就诊者和患者流量:一项行政数据研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Oct 12;20(1):938. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05774-6.
2
Transitions in health care settings for frequent and infrequent users of emergency departments: a population-based retrospective cohort study.急诊科频繁和非频繁使用者在医疗保健环境中的过渡:一项基于人群的回顾性队列研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Nov 14;23(1):1250. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-10260-w.
3
Evaluating the transitions in care for children presenting with acute asthma to emergency departments: a retrospective cohort study.评估因急性哮喘到急诊科就诊的儿童的护理交接情况:一项回顾性队列研究。
BMC Emerg Med. 2021 Dec 7;21(1):153. doi: 10.1186/s12873-021-00550-z.
4
Characteristics of Pediatric Frequent Users of Emergency Departments in Alberta and Ontario.艾伯塔省和安大略省儿科急诊频繁就诊者的特征。
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2022 Mar 1;38(3):108-114. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000002569.
5
Temporal trends in emergency department volumes and crowding metrics in a western Canadian province: a population-based, administrative data study.加拿大西部一省急诊科就诊量和拥挤度指标的时间趋势:基于人群的行政数据研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Apr 26;20(1):356. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05196-4.
6
Characteristics of frequent users of emergency departments in Alberta and Ontario, Canada: an administrative data study.加拿大艾伯塔省和安大略省急诊科频繁就诊者的特征:一项行政数据研究。
CJEM. 2021 Mar;23(2):206-213. doi: 10.1007/s43678-020-00013-7. Epub 2021 Jan 4.
7
Characterizing people with frequent emergency department visits and substance use: a retrospective cohort study of linked administrative data in Ontario, Alberta, and B.C., Canada.描述经常到急诊部门就诊和有药物使用问题的人群:加拿大安大略省、艾伯塔省和不列颠哥伦比亚省的链接行政数据的回顾性队列研究。
BMC Emerg Med. 2022 Jul 14;22(1):127. doi: 10.1186/s12873-022-00673-x.
8
Emergency Department Length of Stay for Critical Care Admissions. A Population-based Study.重症监护病房收治患者的急诊科住院时间。一项基于人群的研究。
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2016 Aug;13(8):1324-32. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201511-773OC.
9
Emergency department crowding negatively influences outcomes for children presenting with asthma: a population-based retrospective cohort study.急诊科拥挤对哮喘患儿的治疗结果产生负面影响:一项基于人群的回顾性队列研究。
Pediatr Res. 2021 Feb;89(3):679-685. doi: 10.1038/s41390-020-0918-2. Epub 2020 Apr 28.
10
Emergency department crowding negatively influences outcomes for adults presenting with asthma: a population-based retrospective cohort study.急诊科拥挤对成年哮喘患者的结局有负面影响:一项基于人群的回顾性队列研究。
BMC Emerg Med. 2022 Dec 24;22(1):209. doi: 10.1186/s12873-022-00766-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Using machine learning to identify frequent attendance at accident and emergency services in Lanarkshire.利用机器学习识别拉纳克郡意外与紧急医疗服务的频繁就诊情况。
Digit Health. 2025 Mar 2;11:20552076251315293. doi: 10.1177/20552076251315293. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
2
Acuity of asthma exacerbations in Alberta, Canada is increasing: a population-based study.加拿大艾伯塔省哮喘急性加重的严重程度正在增加:一项基于人群的研究。
Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol. 2024 Feb 12;20(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s13223-024-00872-0.
3
Transitions in health care settings for frequent and infrequent users of emergency departments: a population-based retrospective cohort study.

本文引用的文献

1
Multistate model of the patient flow process in the pediatric emergency department.儿科急诊患者流程的多州模型。
PLoS One. 2019 Jul 10;14(7):e0219514. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0219514. eCollection 2019.
2
Psychological distress in frequent users of primary health care and emergency departments: a scoping review.频繁使用基层医疗保健和急诊部门人群的心理困扰:范围综述。
Public Health. 2019 Jul;172:1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2019.03.024. Epub 2019 May 23.
3
Characteristics and predictors of adult frequent emergency department users in the United States: A systematic literature review.
急诊科频繁和非频繁使用者在医疗保健环境中的过渡:一项基于人群的回顾性队列研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Nov 14;23(1):1250. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-10260-w.
4
Emergency department utilization and hospital admissions for ambulatory care sensitive conditions among people seeking a primary care provider during the COVID-19 pandemic.在 COVID-19 大流行期间,寻求初级保健提供者的人群中,因可在门诊治疗的条件而急诊就诊和住院的情况。
CMAJ Open. 2023 Jun 20;11(3):E527-E536. doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20220128. Print 2023 May-Jun.
5
Agreement and prognostic accuracy of three ED vulnerability screeners: findings from a prospective multi-site cohort study.三种 ED 脆弱性筛查工具的一致性和预后准确性:一项前瞻性多中心队列研究的结果。
CJEM. 2023 Mar;25(3):209-217. doi: 10.1007/s43678-023-00458-6. Epub 2023 Mar 1.
6
An observational pilot study: Prevalence and cost of high frequency emergency department users at Örebro University Hospital, Sweden.一项观察性试点研究:瑞典厄勒布鲁大学医院高频急诊患者的患病率和成本。
PLoS One. 2022 Sep 15;17(9):e0274622. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0274622. eCollection 2022.
7
Subgroups of people who make frequent emergency department visits in Ontario and Alberta: a retrospective cohort study.安大略省和艾伯塔省频繁就诊急诊部的人群亚组:一项回顾性队列研究。
CMAJ Open. 2022 Mar 15;10(1):E232-E246. doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20210132. Print 2022 Jan-Mar.
8
People who make frequent emergency department visits based on persistence of frequent use in Ontario and Alberta: a retrospective cohort study.基于安大略省和艾伯塔省频繁使用的持续性,频繁到急诊科就诊的人群:一项回顾性队列研究。
CMAJ Open. 2022 Mar 15;10(1):E220-E231. doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20210131. Print 2022 Jan-Mar.
9
Measuring the impact of an acute visiting scheme on emergency department attendances - a pre-post cohort design.测量急性就诊计划对急诊科就诊人数的影响 - 前后队列设计。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 May 28;21(1):521. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06557-3.
美国成年高频急诊患者的特征和预测因素:系统文献回顾。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2019 Jun;25(3):420-433. doi: 10.1111/jep.13137. Epub 2019 May 2.
4
Characterizing Highly Frequent Users of a Large Canadian Urban Emergency Department.描述加拿大大型城市急诊部门的高频使用者特征。
West J Emerg Med. 2018 Nov;19(6):926-933. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2018.9.39369. Epub 2018 Oct 18.
5
Characteristics of Frequent Users of Emergency Medical Services in Singapore.新加坡紧急医疗服务频繁使用者的特征。
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2019 Mar-Apr;23(2):215-224. doi: 10.1080/10903127.2018.1484969. Epub 2018 Aug 17.
6
Coordination Program Reduced Acute Care Use And Increased Primary Care Visits Among Frequent Emergency Care Users.协调项目减少了频繁急诊患者的急性护理使用量并增加了其初级护理就诊次数。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2017 Oct 1;36(10):1705-1711. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2017.0612.
7
Emergency Department Flow Measures for Adult and Pediatric Patients in British Columbia and Ontario: A Retrospective, Repeated Cross-Sectional Study.不列颠哥伦比亚省和安大略省成人及儿科患者的急诊科流程措施:一项回顾性重复横断面研究。
J Emerg Med. 2017 Sep;53(3):418-426. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2017.05.004. Epub 2017 Jul 1.
8
Contributing factors of frequent use of the emergency department: A synthesis.急诊科频繁使用的促成因素:一项综述。
Int Emerg Nurs. 2017 Nov;35:51-55. doi: 10.1016/j.ienj.2017.06.001. Epub 2017 Jul 1.
9
The Efficacy of Case Management on Emergency Department Frequent Users: An Eight-Year Observational Study.病例管理对急诊科频繁使用者的疗效:一项为期八年的观察性研究。
J Emerg Med. 2016 Nov;51(5):595-604. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2016.06.002. Epub 2016 Aug 29.
10
Designing services for frequent attenders to the emergency department: a characterisation of this population to inform service design.为急诊科频繁就诊者设计服务:对这一人群的特征描述以指导服务设计。
Clin Med (Lond). 2016 Aug;16(4):325-9. doi: 10.7861/clinmedicine.16-4-325.